Translating research into improved outcomes in comprehensive cancer control.

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Blvd. EPN 6144, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Cancer Causes and Control (Impact Factor: 2.96). 11/2005; 16 Suppl 1:27-40. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-005-0488-y
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A key question in moving comprehensive cancer control (CCC) plans into action is, to what extent should the knowledge gained from investments in cancer prevention and control research influence the actions taken by states, tribes, and territories during implementation? Underlying this 'should' is the assumption that evidence-based approaches (i.e., a public health or clinical intervention or policy that has resulted in improved outcomes when scientifically tested), when implemented in a real-world setting, will increase the likelihood of improved outcomes. This article elucidates the barriers and opportunities for integrating science with practice across the cancer control continuum. However, given the scope of CCC and the substantial investment in generating new knowledge through science, it is difficult for any one agency, on its own, to make a sufficient investment to ensure new knowledge is translated and implemented at a national, state, or local level. Thus, if greater demand for evidence-based interventions and increased resources for adopting them are going to support the dissemination initiatives described herein, new interagency partnerships must be developed to ensure that sufficient means are dedicated to integrating science with service. Furthermore, for these collaborations to increase both in size and in frequency, agency leaders must clearly articulate their support for these collaborative initiatives and explicitly recognize those collaborative efforts that are successful. In this way, the whole (in this context, comprehensive cancer control) can become greater than the sum of its parts.

Download full-text


Available from: Cynthia Vinson, Jun 17, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Training on use of evidence may increase the adoption of evidence-based strategies in communities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Prevention Programs That Work training. This article summarizes the training modules and evaluation results from three trainings conducted in Spring 2009. The training teaches practitioners from community-based organizations to locate, choose, adopt or adapt, and evaluate an evidence-based program. Participants completed a pretest and posttest that covered competencies related to use of evidence, demographics, and feedback on training. A total of 47 participants attended three trainings. They represented coordinators, directors, nurses, and outreach workers. Participants showed the greatest increases in the following competencies: locate evidence-based resources, narrow search results of potential programs or strategies to reflect programmatic specifics, define steps in the adaptation process, and discuss factors during each phase of implementation. According to participants, the most useful aspects of the training content were the areas that covered program implementation, adaptation, and evaluation. A workshop can increase competencies to use evidence-based strategies among community practitioners. Building competencies is a critical initial step in promoting the dissemination of evidence-based strategies and helping practitioners use a systematic process to select an evidence-based intervention and implement the programs with fidelity.
    Health Promotion Practice 07/2012; 13(5):707-15. DOI:10.1177/1524839912437787 · 0.55 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Use of community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches is increasing with the goal of making more meaningful and impactful advances in eliminating cancer-related health disparities. While many reports have espoused its advantages, few investigations have focused on comparing CBPR-oriented recruitment and retention. Consequently, the purpose of this analysis was to report and compare two different CBPR approaches in two cancer prevention studies. We utilized frequencies and Chi-squared tests to compare and contrast subject recruitment and retention for two studies that incorporated a randomized, controlled intervention design of a dietary and physical activity intervention among African Americans (AA). One study utilized a de-centralized approach to recruitment in which primary responsibility for recruitment was assigned to the general AA community of various church partners whereas the other incorporated a centralized approach to recruitment in which a single lay community individual was hired as research personnel to lead recruitment and intervention delivery. Both studies performed equally well for both recruitment and retention (75 and 88 % recruitment rates and 71 and 66 % retention rates) far exceeding those rates traditionally cited for cancer clinical trials (~5 %). The de-centralized approach to retention appeared to result in statistically greater retention for the control participants compared to the centralized approach (77 vs. 51 %, p < 0.01). Consequently, both CBPR approaches appeared to greatly enhance recruitment and retention rates of AA populations. We further note lessons learned and challenges to consider for future research opportunities.
    Journal of Community Health 08/2014; 40(2). DOI:10.1007/s10900-014-9924-9 · 1.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We describe the feasibility of a Web-based portal for training peer community health advisors (CHAs). We conducted a community-based implementation trial in African American churches between 2012 and 2014. The Web-based portal allows CHAs to log in and view 13 training videos, preparing them to deliver 3 cancer early detection workshops in their churches. Of 8 churches, 6 completed the training, each certifying 2 CHAs. These CHAs took an average of 26 days to complete the training, requiring little technical assistance. Additional technical assistance was required to implement the workshops. The Web-based system appears to be a feasible method for training lay individuals for the CHA role and has implications for increasing the reach of evidence-based interventions. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print October 16, 2014: e1-e8. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302237).
    American Journal of Public Health 10/2014; DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302237 · 4.23 Impact Factor