Article

Translating research into improved outcomes in comprehensive cancer control.

Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Blvd. EPN 6144, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Cancer Causes and Control (Impact Factor: 2.96). 11/2005; 16 Suppl 1:27-40. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-005-0488-y
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A key question in moving comprehensive cancer control (CCC) plans into action is, to what extent should the knowledge gained from investments in cancer prevention and control research influence the actions taken by states, tribes, and territories during implementation? Underlying this 'should' is the assumption that evidence-based approaches (i.e., a public health or clinical intervention or policy that has resulted in improved outcomes when scientifically tested), when implemented in a real-world setting, will increase the likelihood of improved outcomes. This article elucidates the barriers and opportunities for integrating science with practice across the cancer control continuum. However, given the scope of CCC and the substantial investment in generating new knowledge through science, it is difficult for any one agency, on its own, to make a sufficient investment to ensure new knowledge is translated and implemented at a national, state, or local level. Thus, if greater demand for evidence-based interventions and increased resources for adopting them are going to support the dissemination initiatives described herein, new interagency partnerships must be developed to ensure that sufficient means are dedicated to integrating science with service. Furthermore, for these collaborations to increase both in size and in frequency, agency leaders must clearly articulate their support for these collaborative initiatives and explicitly recognize those collaborative efforts that are successful. In this way, the whole (in this context, comprehensive cancer control) can become greater than the sum of its parts.

0 Followers
 · 
88 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The similarities between social marketing and the diffusion of innovation model are strong as soon as one seeks to use diffusion concepts to affect the rate of adoption and quality of implementation. This chapter establishes those similarities.
    Handbook of Persuasion and Social Marketing, Edited by David W. Stewart, 01/2015: pages 35-66; Praeger.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has supported implementation science for over a decade. We explore the application of implementation science across the cancer control continuum, including prevention, screening, treatment, and survivorship. Methods: We reviewed funding trends of implementation science grants funded by the NCI between 2000-2012. We assessed study characteristics including cancer topic, position on the T2-T4 translational continuum, intended use of frameworks, study design, settings, methods, and replication and cost considerations. Results: We identified 67 NCI grant awards having an implementation science focus. R01 was the most common mechanism, and the total number of all awards increased from four in 2003 to 15 in 2012. Prevention grants were most frequent (49.3%) and cancer treatment least common (4.5%). Diffusion of Innovations and RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) were the most widely reported frameworks, but it is unclear how implementation science models informed planned study measures. Most grants (69%) included mixed methods, and half reported replication and cost considerations (49.3%). Conclusion: Implementation science in cancer research is active and diverse, but could be enhanced by greater focus on measures development, assessment of how conceptual frameworks and their constructs lead to improved dissemination and implementation outcomes, and harmonization of measures that are valid, reliable, and practical across multiple settings.
    Implementation Science 01/2015; DOI:10.1186/s13012-014-0200-2 · 3.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We describe the feasibility of a Web-based portal for training peer community health advisors (CHAs). We conducted a community-based implementation trial in African American churches between 2012 and 2014. The Web-based portal allows CHAs to log in and view 13 training videos, preparing them to deliver 3 cancer early detection workshops in their churches. Of 8 churches, 6 completed the training, each certifying 2 CHAs. These CHAs took an average of 26 days to complete the training, requiring little technical assistance. Additional technical assistance was required to implement the workshops. The Web-based system appears to be a feasible method for training lay individuals for the CHA role and has implications for increasing the reach of evidence-based interventions. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print October 16, 2014: e1-e8. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302237).
    American Journal of Public Health 10/2014; DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302237 · 4.23 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
72 Downloads
Available from
May 16, 2014