Article

Sustained efficacy and safety of vardenafil for treatment of erectile dysfunction: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Service d'Urologie, Hôpital St-Luc du CHUM, 1058 rue Saint-Denis, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Impact Factor: 5.81). 11/2005; 80(10):1291-7. DOI: 10.4065/80.10.1291
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the reliability, efficacy, and safety of vardenafil, 10 mg, for patients with erectile dysfunction.
Vardenafil-naive patients completed a 4-week treatment-free run-in phase and a 1-week single-dose vardenafil (10 mg) open-label challenge phase. Responders to vardenafil in the challenge phase were randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind, fixed-dose treatment with vardenafil at 10 mg or placebo. Diary responses to Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) questions about erections and attempts at sexual activity were collected after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of randomized treatment. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study.
During the open-label challenge phase, the proportions of patients with a first-time success for penetration (SEP2) and maintenance of erection (SEP3) were 87% and 74%, respectively. Of 600 patients challenged with a single dose of vardenafil at 10 mg, 260 were randomized to vardenafil and 263 to placebo. During the double-blind phase, the reliability of penetration and maintenance rates for patients successful during the challenge phase were significantly greater with vardenafil compared with placebo (83.4% vs 55.8% [SEP2] and 76.6% vs 42.1% [SEP3], respectively). At week 12, patients in the vardenafil group had a consistently higher least squares mean (SE) on the erectile function domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function than patients in the placebo group (23.5 [0.4] vs 15.8 [0.4], respectively [last observation carried forward]) and a greater proportion of positive responses to the Global Assessment Question (80.8% vs 32.3%, respectively [last observation carried forward]) at each assessment (Pc.001). Vardenafil was generally well tolerated; most adverse events were mild to moderate, with headache and flushing reported most frequently.
During this 12-week study, vardenafil produced consistently higher reliability of penetration and maintenance of erection rates compared to placebo and was generally well tolerated in patients with erectile dysfunction.

0 Followers
 · 
69 Views
  • Aging Health 12/2005; 1(3):367-377. DOI:10.2217/1745509X.1.3.367
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The introduction in 1998 of the phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE-5) inhibitors has changed the landscape of diagnosis and, in particular, the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). It has paved the road for a more profound insight into ED. ED and other ailments of elderly men, such as atherosclerosis, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and lower urinary tract symptoms were usually regarded as distinct diagnostic/therapeutic entities, but there is growing evidence that they are interrelated and are factors in ED. To optimise the treatment of ED, an integral approach to the health of the ageing male is required. There is an interdependence between the metabolic syndrome, ED and patterns of testosterone in ageing men. The main features of the metabolic syndrome are abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, hypertension and dyslipidaemia, significant factors in the aetiology of erectile function. The metabolic syndrome is associated with lower-than-normal testosterone levels. Testosterone is a determinant of glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism. Testosterone is not only a factor in libido but also exerts essential effects on the anatomical and physiological substrate of penile erection. With these recent insights, the health problems of elderly men must be placed in a context that allows an integral approach. While PDE-5 inhibitors are the mainstay of treatment of men with ED, treatment of testosterone deficiency is becoming part and parcel of a new approach to both ED and the metabolic syndrome. The diagnostic work-up of ED should comprise measurement of plasma testosterone. If proven deficient, treatment with testosterone is indicated.
    American journal of men's health 06/2008; 5(2):163-170. DOI:10.1016/j.jomh.2008.04.002 · 1.15 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: First-dose success of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors may be adversely affected in patients with comorbidities. This article reports first-dose success rates for vardenafil 10 mg in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) and associated comorbidities who participated in the challenge phase of the Reliability – Vardenafil for Erectile Dysfunction I study. This study involved an open-label, single-dose, 1-week challenge period where patients who achieved SEP-2 (penetration) success were randomised to vardenafil 10 mg or placebo for 12 weeks in a double-blind manner. The first-dose success rates for SEP-2 and SEP-3 (maintenance of erection to completion of intercourse) were stratified according to comorbidities. Safety was assessed using adverse events (AEs). Of 600 men who received a single 10 mg dose of vardenafil, 32% had hypertension, 16% had diabetes and 19% had dyslipidaemia. Vardenafil demonstrated overall effectiveness, including first-dose SEP-2 and SEP-3 success rates in patients with and without specific comorbidities. Initial overall success rates for SEP-2 and SEP-3 during the challenge phase were 87% and 74% respectively. First-dose SEP-2 and SEP-3 success rates were 84% and 66% in men with hypertension (n = 191); 84% and 72% in men with dyslipidaemia (n = 116); and 75% and 58% in men with diabetes (n = 95). Vardenafil was well tolerated and most AEs, including the most frequently reported flushing (3.5%), were mild to moderate in intensity. Vardenafil 10 mg is generally well tolerated and efficacious, providing first-dose success with a consistently high rate of reliability of penetration and maintenance of erection in men with ED and associated comorbidities.
    International Journal of Clinical Practice 10/2006; 60(11):1378 - 1385. DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01170.x · 2.54 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
10 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014