Article

Use of hepatitis B core antibody-positive liver allograft in hepatitis C virus-positive and -negative recipients with use of short course of hepatitis B immunoglobulin and Lamivudine.

Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Strong Memorial Hospital, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
Transplantation Proceedings (Impact Factor: 0.95). 10/2005; 37(7):3187-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.07.049
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT With the shortage of donor organs, increasing number of hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive [HBcAb(+)] liver allografts are being used for liver transplantation (LTx) in patients who are HBcab-negative [HBsAb(-)]. This study was aimed at assessing outcomes for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive [HCV(+)] and HCV-negative [HCV(-)] patients who received HBcAb(+) liver grafts from deceased donors and also received a short course of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) with long-term lamivudine therapy after LTx.
From February 1995 through February 2003, 28 patients (mean age 53.8 +/- 10.2 years, 19 men and nine women, 16 HCV[-]; 12 HCV[+]) received HbcAb(+) liver allografts. All recipients received a short course of HBIg prophylaxis (10,000 units/day for 4 days) and long-term lamivudine 100 mg/d after LTx in addition to a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen.
Seven (25%) of the 28 recipients died during follow-up and three recipients required retransplantation. Three recipients (10.7%) developed HBV infection during follow-up, one of whom died 36 months after LTx and the other two had YMDD mutant HBV. The overall 6-year actuarial patient survival after transplantation was 74.4% and those for HCV(-) and HCV(+) recipients were 81.3% and 66.6%, respectively (P = .46). The overall 6-year actuarial graft survival was 63.9% and those for HCV(+) and HCV(-) recipients were 68.8% and 57.1%, respectively (P = .6).
We conclude that HBcAb(+) liver grafts can be used for both HCV(+) patients and HCV(-) patients who are critically ill, have early hepatocellular carcinoma, or have been exposed to HBV in the past. A short course of HBIg-lamivudine combination therapy provides effective prophylaxis against HBV infection in 89% of recipients of HBcAb(+) grafts.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
81 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of livers from hepatitis B surface antigen–negative (HBsAg−)/hepatitis B core antibody–positive (HBcAb+) donors in liver transplantation (LT) for HBsAg−/HBcAb− recipients is still controversial because of a lack of standard antiviral prophylaxis and long-term follow-up. We present our 13-year experience with the use of HBcAb+ donor livers in HBcAb− recipients. Patients received prophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin at the time of LT and then lamivudine daily. De novo hepatitis B virus (HBV) was defined as positive HBV DNA detection. Between January 1999 and December 2010, 1013 adult LT procedures were performed at our center. Sixty-four HBsAg−/HBcAb− patients (6.3%) received an HBsAg−/HBcAb+ liver. All donor sera were negative for HBcAb immunoglobulin M and HBV DNA. The mean follow-up was 48.8 ± 40.1 months (range = 1.2-148.8). Both the patient survival rates and the graft survival rates were 92.2% and 69.2% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. No graft losses or deaths were related to de novo HBV. Nine of the 64 patients (14.1%) developed de novo HBV. The mean time from LT to de novo HBV was 21.4 ± 26.1 months (range = 10.8-92.8 months). De novo HBV was successfully treated with adefovir or tenofovir. In conclusion, HBcAb+ allografts can be safely used in HBcAb− recipients without increased mortality or graft loss. Lifelong prophylaxis, continuous surveillance, and compliance are imperative for success. Should a de novo infection occur, our experience suggests that a variety of treatments can be employed to salvage the graft and obtain serum HBV DNA clearance. Liver Transpl 19:611–618, 2013. © 2013 AASLD.
    Liver Transplantation 06/2013; 19(6). · 3.79 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Selection of the appropriate donor is essential to a successful allograft recipient outcome for solid organ transplantation. Multiple infectious diseases have been transmitted from the donor to the recipient via transplantation. Donor-transmitted infections cause increased morbidity and mortality to the recipient. In recent years, a series of high-profile transmissions of infections have occurred in organ recipients prompting increased attention on the process of improving the selection of an appropriate donor that balances the shortage of needed allografts with an approach that mitigates the risk of donor-transmitted infection to the recipient. Important advances focused on improving donor screening diagnostics, using previously excluded high-risk donors, and individualizing the selection of allografts to recipients based on their prior infection history are serving to increase the donor pool and improve outcomes after transplant. This article serves to review the relevant literature surrounding this topic and to provide a suggested approach to the selection of an appropriate solid organ transplant donor.
    World journal of transplantation. 06/2014; 4(2):43-56.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is concern over the development of de novo hepatitis B in patients receiving liver transplants from hepatitis B surface antigen negative, hepatitis B core antibody positive donors. Current practice is to place such patients on indefinite lamivudine prophylaxis; however, there is a small risk of breakthrough infection and newer antivirals for hepatitis B are available. The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of lamivudine compared with the newer agents, tenofovir and entecavir, in the prophylaxis setting using a Markov model. Three strategies were examined which consisted of either lamivudine or entecavir monoprophylaxis with tenofovir add-on therapy after breakthrough or tenofovir monoprophylaxis with emtricitabine add-on therapy after breakthrough. In the base case scenario, lamivudine was the most cost-effective option at a threshold of $100 000 per quality-adjusted life-year and this remained robust despite parameter uncertainty. Tenofovir had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $3 540 194.77 while other strategies were superior to entecavir therapy. Until drug costs decrease, lamivudine remains the most cost-effective option for hepatitis B prophylaxis in the liver transplant setting.
    American Journal of Transplantation 01/2014; · 6.19 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
80 Downloads
Available from
May 26, 2014