A pilot survey of patient-initiated assaults on medical students during clinical clerkship

Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Academic Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 0.81). 09/2005; 29(4):350-3. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ap.29.4.350
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess the incidents of patient-initiated assault (PIA) against clinical clerks during the first six months of clinical clerkship. To characterise the assaults with respect to service, location, clerk gender, patient gender. To examine the students' perceptions of the reporting process for PIA.
A brief email survey was sent to all third year medical students after six months of clinical clerkship experience. Students were asked to describe assault experiences including: location, service, patient gender and injuries sustained.
Six students reported experiencing physical assault in the first six months of clerkship. Assaults occurred on psychiatry (4) and internal medicine (2) services. Two of the assaults took place during consultations in the emergency department. All students reported having pre-clerkship training in management of violent situations. No students were aware of PIA reporting protocols for their hospital.
Clinical clerks are at risk of PIA during their training. Students experiencing PIA feel that current levels of pre-clerkship training do not adequately inform them of the resources available after such an incident. These findings underline the need for PIA programs in the undergraduate curriculum including preclerkship training and clear, institution-wide reporting guidelines.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Psychiatric patient assaults on healthcare staff are a worldwide occupational hazard. This present 20-year, retrospective study examined the characteristics of these staff victims in one public-sector, health care system and assessed the psychological support provided to these victims by the post-incident Assaulted Staff Action Program (ASAP). An additional analysis compared the victim characteristics in this same health care system at 10-, 15-, and 20-year intervals. The findings were consistent with earlier, worldwide studies. Staff victims tend to be younger, less formally educated, less experienced, and less trained mental health workers, residential house counselors, and trainees of differing disciplines. ASAP provided needed support to staff victims. Risk management strategies for safety, methodological issues, and the problem of denial in fielding a post-incident crisis intervention program for staff victims were discussed.
    Psychiatric Quarterly 03/2011; 82(1):11-21. DOI:10.1007/s11126-010-9153-z · 1.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective. The goal of this study was to examine the monthly incidence rates of abusive encounters for family physicians in Canada. Methods. A 7-page cross-sectional survey. Results. Of the entire study sample (N = 720), 29% of the physicians reported having experienced an abusive event in the last month by a patient or patient family member. Abusive incidents were classified as minor, major, or severe. Of the physician participants who reported having been abused, all reported having experienced a minor event, 26% a major, and 8% a severe event. Of the physicians who experienced an abusive event, 55% were not aware of any policies to protect them, 76% did not seek help, and 64% did not report the abusive event. Conclusion. Family physicians are subjected to significant amounts of abuse in their day-to-day practices. Few physicians are aware of workplace policies that could protect them, and fewer report abusive encounters. Physicians would benefit from increased awareness of institutional policies that can protect them against abusive patients and their families and from the development of a national policy.
    11/2010; 2010:387202. DOI:10.1155/2010/387202
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Harassment and discrimination include a wide range of behaviors that medical trainees perceive as being humiliating, hostile, or abusive. To understand the significance of such mistreatment and to explore potential preventive strategies, the authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the prevalence, risk factors, and sources of harassment and discrimination among medical trainees. In 2011, the authors identified relevant studies by searching MEDLINE and EMBASE, scanning reference lists of relevant studies, and contacting experts. They included studies that reported the prevalence, risk factors, and sources of harassment and discrimination among medical trainees. Two reviewers independently screened all articles and abstracted study and participant characteristics and study results. The authors assessed the methodological quality in individual studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. They also conducted a meta-analysis. The authors included 57 cross-sectional and 2 cohort studies in their review. The meta-analysis of 51 studies demonstrated that 59.4% of medical trainees had experienced at least one form of harassment or discrimination during their training (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.0%-66.7%). Verbal harassment was the most commonly cited form of harassment (prevalence: 63.0%; 95% CI: 54.8%-71.2%). Consultants were the most commonly cited source of harassment and discrimination, followed by patients or patients' families (34.4% and 21.9%, respectively). This review demonstrates the surprisingly high prevalence of harassment and discrimination among medical trainees that has not declined over time. The authors recommend both drafting policies and promoting cultural change within academic institutions to prevent future abuse.
    Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 03/2014; DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000200 · 2.34 Impact Factor