Novel PMS1 Alleles Preferentially Affect the Repair of Primer Strand Loops during DNA Replication

Molecular and Medical Genetics, Oregon Health and Science University, L103, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA.
Molecular and Cellular Biology (Impact Factor: 4.78). 12/2005; 25(21):9221-31. DOI: 10.1128/MCB.25.21.9221-9231.2005
Source: PubMed


Null mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes elevate both base substitutions and insertions/deletions in simple sequence
repeats. Data suggest that during replication of simple repeat sequences, polymerase slippage can generate single-strand loops
on either the primer or template strand that are subsequently processed by the MMR machinery to prevent insertions and deletions,
respectively. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammalian cells, MMR appears to be more efficient at repairing mispairs comprised of loops on the template strand compared
to loops on the primer strand. We identified two novel yeast pms1 alleles, pms1-G882E and pms1-H888R, which confer a strong defect in the repair of “primer strand” loops, while maintaining efficient repair of “template strand”
loops. Furthermore, these alleles appear to affect equally the repair of 1-nucleotide primer strand loops during both leading-
and lagging-strand replication. Interestingly, both pms1 mutants are proficient in the repair of 1-nucleotide loop mispairs in heteroduplex DNA generated during meiotic recombination.
Our results suggest that the inherent inefficiency of primer strand loop repair is not simply a mismatch recognition problem
but also involves Pms1 and other proteins that are presumed to function downstream of mismatch recognition, such as Mlh1.
In addition, the findings reinforce the current view that during mutation avoidance, MMR is associated with the replication

Download full-text


Available from: R Michael Liskay, Jan 23, 2014
  • Source
    • "The yeast two-hybrid screen was conducted as described (Tolwinski et al., 2003). We followed the mutagenesis and screening protocol of Erdeniz et al. (2005) to generate and identify Axin mutants failing to interact with Armadillo-or Shaggy-bait. A 1 kb Axin fragment was amplified by mutagenic polymerase chain reaction (PCR); the product was directly recombined into a vector in yeast to generate a library. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Proper regulation of the Wingless/Wnt signaling pathway is essential for normal development. The scaffolding protein Axin plays a key role in this process through interactions with Drosophila Shaggy and Armadillo. In the current studies, we used a yeast two-hybrid assay to identify ten amino acids in Axin that are critical for in vitro interaction with Shaggy and two for interaction with Armadillo. We then generated five Axin variants in which individual putative contact amino acids were mutated and compared their activity, as assayed by rescue of axin null mutant flies, to that of Axin lacking the entire Shaggy (AxinDeltaSgg) or Armadillo (AxinDeltaArm) binding domain. Although we expected these mutants to function identically to Axin in which the entire binding domain was deleted, we instead observed a spectrum of phenotypic rescue. Specifically, two point mutants within the Shaggy binding domain showed loss of activity similar to that of AxinDeltaSgg and dominantly interfered with complex function, whereas a third mutant allele, AxinK446E, retained most function. Two Axin point mutants within the Armadillo binding domain were weak alleles and retained most function. These findings demonstrate the importance of in vivo verification of the role of specific amino acids within a protein.
    Developmental Biology 10/2009; 337(1):110-23. DOI:10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.10.016 · 3.55 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The lys2A746 allele was introduced into his4::LYS2 strains using the delitto perfetto method [44]. First, the CORE cassette was inserted into the strains as described previously [46]. The CORE cassette within LYS2 was then replaced by an 860 bp PCR fragment of lys2A746 amplified from SJR922 [10] using primers MO18 ( "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases are specialized to bypass lesions that block replicative polymerases and prevent complete genome duplication. Current TLS models hypothesize that PCNA, the polymerase processivity clamp, is important for regulating the access and loading of the low fidelity TLS polymerases onto DNA in response to replication-blocking lesions. PCNA binds to the C-terminus of yeast Poleta, for example, and this interaction is required for cell survival after UV irradiation. Previously, we identified two spontaneous, Polzeta-dependent "complex" mutation hotspots using the lys2DeltaA746 frameshift reversion assay in repair-compromised cells. In the current study we observed an accumulation of Polzeta-dependent complex frameshifts at a third hotspot in Poleta-deficient cells. Interestingly, the sequence of this third hotspot is the reverse complement of the two hotspots previously identified, suggesting that the utilization of Polzeta and Poleta may be related to the position of the relevant lesion on either the leading- or lagging-strand template. Using the lys2DeltaA746 assay system, we investigated changes in the accumulation of complex events at hotspots when the direction of replication was reversed in repair-compromised cells with either wildtype Poleta, a deletion of Poleta, or a mutant of Poleta that cannot interact with PCNA. Our results suggest that there is a polymerase hierarchy between Poleta and Polzeta in the bypass of certain lesions and that the interaction of Poleta with PCNA is needed for some, but not all, spontaneous lesion bypass.
    DNA Repair 10/2007; 6(9):1307-18. DOI:10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.02.026 · 3.11 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mutagenesis is a prerequisite for evolution and also is an important contributor to human diseases. Most mutations in actively dividing cells originate during DNA replication as errors introduced when copying an undamaged DNA template or during the bypass of DNA lesions. In addition, mutations can be introduced during the repair of DNA double-strand breaks by either homologous recombination or non-homologous end-joining pathways. Finally, although generally considered to be a very high-fidelity process, the excision repair of DNA damage may be an important contributor to mutagenesis in non-dividing cells. In this review, we will discuss the well-known contributions of DNA replication to mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as well as the less-appreciated contributions of recombination and repair to mutagenesis in this organism.
    DNA Repair 05/2006; 5(4):409-21. DOI:10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.11.006 · 3.11 Impact Factor
Show more