Complications of transvaginal silicone-coated polyester synthetic mesh sling

The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States
Urology (Impact Factor: 2.13). 11/2005; 66(4):741-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.04.027
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To report a premarket multicenter trial to test the feasibility of a transvaginal silicone-coated polyester synthetic mesh sling in women with anatomic incontinence.
Fifty-one patients in four centers underwent transvaginal placement of a silicone-coated polyester synthetic mesh sling (American Medical Systems) during an 8-month period. Of the 51 patients, 31 were part of a prospective institutional review board-approved feasibility trial in three centers funded by American Medical Systems (group 1) and 20 underwent implantation by a single surgeon and their data were retrospectively reviewed (group 2). The studies were done concomitantly, and all slings were fixed transvaginally with bone anchors. All patients in group 1 were followed up at 4 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year (as applicable) with repeat questionnaires, physical examinations, and pad tests.
In group 1, 20 patients completed 6 months of follow-up. Ten patients (32%) required a second surgical procedure at an average of 183 days (range 68 to 343) postoperatively. Eight patients (26%) had vaginal extrusion of the mesh, one (3%) required sling lysis, and one (3%) required sling removal because of infection. In group 2, 8 patients (40%) underwent sling removal for vaginal extrusion at a mean of 160 days (range 83 to 214).
Transvaginally placed silicone-coated mesh slings used for the treatment of urinary incontinence demonstrated an unacceptably high vaginal extrusion rate in this study. Once identified, this study was immediately terminated, and this product was not marketed for this application in the United States.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the past decade, sling surgery has become the preferred technique for the management of female stress urinary incontinence. A greater understanding of the pathogenesis of stress urinary incontinence and a greater durability and effectiveness for sling surgery has allowed this technique to become the benchmark for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. As a consequence, a multitude of products have been developed using various techniques and materials to perform sling surgery. This article reviews the materials and techniques available and the complications associated with each. Most importantly, the outcomes are discussed so that the readers can best understand the impact of these surgeries on our patients.
    Current Urology Reports 11/2004; 5(5):374-80. DOI:10.1007/s11934-004-0087-6 · 1.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Radiopaque polymeric microspheres have a potential as new bulking agents for treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The advantage over existing bulking agents lies in their X-ray visibility in situ; other polymeric bulking agents (e.g., PTFE or silicone rubbers) are practically radiolucent (i.e., incapable of absorbing X-radiation). Radiopacity is useful in practice because of the high spatial accuracy of X-ray imaging. For instance, X-ray fluoroscopy can be used to assess possible migration of the bulking agent over time or to provide guidance in cases in which a second injection of a bulking agent is necessary (repeated treatment of SUI). Biocompatibility of injected radiopaque microspheres was investigated in vivo by using the mouse as a model. Microspheres were injected subcutaneously (9 animals) or intramuscularly (9 animals), and follow-up was 8 days or 3 months. X-ray fluoroscopy gave clear images of the microspheres as an ensemble, and it was found that no migration occurred during 3 months. Histopathology confirmed that all microspheres stayed close to the site of the injection. The microspheres appeared to be well tolerated; only a few giant cells, manifesting a mild inflammatory reaction, were encountered. At 3 months, capillary blood vessels were observed throughout the microsphere beds, and macrophages and fibroblast cells were seen in between the microspheres. This is encouraging with respect to the intended application, although it must be acknowledged that the data refer merely to a mouse model. Further experiments with larger, more representative models (rabbit and goat) are in progress.
    Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 06/2005; 73(4):430-6. DOI:10.1002/jbm.a.30293 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Synthetic meshes are increasingly used in the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic-organ prolapse in an attempt to improve success rates and increase the longevity of repairs. This review describes and analyses complications following pelvic-floor procedures employing synthetic meshes. Type I monofilament polypropylene mesh with a large pore size is currently the mesh of choice. Chronic inflammation is a typical host response, whereas acute inflammation and predominant CD20+ lymphocyte infiltration represent an adverse host reaction and may result in defective healing. Mesh properties influence the performance and complication rate. Mesh-related complications after midurethral slings and mesh sacrocolpopexies with monofilament polypropylene are rare. An up to 26% mesh erosion rate and up to 38% dyspareunia rate with vaginally introduced mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse repair has been reported. Concurrent hysterectomy seems to increase mesh erosion rates. Surgeons should be aware of the potential complications of synthetic meshes. Until data on the safety and efficacy of synthetic mesh in vaginal reconstructive surgery emerge, its routine use outside of clinical trials cannot be recommended.
    Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 11/2006; 18(5):560-6. DOI:10.1097/01.gco.0000242961.48114.b0 · 2.37 Impact Factor
Show more