Article

Personal computer versus workstation display: observer performance in detection of wrist fractures on digital radiographs.

Radiology Department, Middlemore Hospital, Hospital Rd, Otahuhu, Auckland 6, New Zealand.
Radiology (Impact Factor: 6.21). 01/2006; 237(3):872-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2373041439
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To retrospectively compare the accuracy of observer performance with personal computer (PC) compared with that with dedicated picture archiving and communication system (PACS) workstation display in the detection of wrist fractures on computed radiographs.
This study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2002 version) of the World Medical Association. The institutional clinical board approved the study; informed consent was not required. Seven observers independently assessed randomized anonymous digital radiographs of the wrist from 259 subjects; 146 had fractures, and 113 were healthy control subjects (151 male and 108 female subjects; average age, 33 years). Follow-up radiographs and/or computed tomographic scans were used as the reference standard for patients with fractures, and follow-up radiographs and/or clinical history data were used as the reference standard for controls. The PC was a standard hospital machine with a 17-inch (43-cm) color monitor with which Web browser display software was used. The PACS workstation had two portrait 21-inch (53-cm) monochrome monitors that displayed 2300 lines. The observers assigned scores to the radiographs on a scale of 1 (no fracture) to 5 (definite fracture). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were compared.
The areas under the ROC curves were almost identical for the PC and workstation (0.910 vs 0.918, respectively; difference, 0.008; 95% confidence interval: -0.029, 0.013). The average sensitivity with the PC was almost identical to that with the workstation (85% vs 84%, respectively), as was the average specificity (82% vs 81%, respectively). The average accuracy (83%) was the same for both.
The results of this study showed that there was no difference in accuracy of observer performance for detection of wrist fractures with a PC compared with that with a PACS workstation.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
59 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background A computer display monitor used for interpreting dental images should have a maximum luminance of 171 cd/m(2). A monitor used for clinical review should have a maximum luminance of 100 cd/m(2).Objective To compare luminance and ambient lighting measurements for a selection of computer display monitors in different locations of a dental teaching hospital to available guidelines. To assess six commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) monitors from the radiology department of the dental teaching hospital after calibration to the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine Part 14: Greyscale Standard Display Function (DICOM part 14: GSDF).Design Data collection.Method Luminance and illuminance measurements were taken for a selection of monitors used for clinical applications throughout a dental teaching hospital. Conformance data were recorded for six COTS monitors from the radiology department following calibration to the DICOM part 14: GSDF. Results None of the tested monitors had a maximum luminance value that was appropriate for image interpretation and the ambient lighting in the vicinity of the monitors was also set to inappropriate levels for image interpretation. The quality of conformance to the DICOM part 14: GSDF varied among the calibrated COTS monitors in the radiology department.Conclusions It is important that display devices used for dental radiology are quality assured. Consideration should be given to ensure that monitors used for dental radiological interpretation have a maximum luminance that meets available guidelines. These monitors should be standardised to the DICOM part 14: GSDF and the illumination of the reporting environment should be controlled.
    British dental journal official journal of the British Dental Association: BDJ online 12/2013; 215(11):E22. · 1.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine if diagnostic accuracy and visual search efficiency with a high luminance medical-grade color display are equivalent to a high luminance medical-grade monochrome display. Six radiologists viewed DR chest images, half with a solitary pulmonary nodule and half without. Observers reported whether or not a nodule was present and their confidence in that decision. Total viewing time per image was recorded. On a subset of 15 cases eye-position was recorded. Confidence data were analyzed using MRMC ROC techniques. There was no statistically significant difference (F = 0.0136, p = 0.9078) between color (mean Az = 0.8981, se = 0.0065) and monochrome (mean Az = 0.8945, se = 0.0148) diagnostic performance. Total viewing time per image did not differ significantly (F = 0.392, p = 0.5315) as a function of color (mean = 27.36 sec, sd = 12.95) vs monochrome (mean = 28.04, sd = 14.36) display. There were no significant differences in decision dwell times (true and false, positive and negative) overall for color vs monochrome displays (F = 0.133, p = 0.7154). The true positive (TP) and false positive (FP) decisions were associated with the longest dwell times, the false negatives (FN) with slightly shorter dwell times, and the true negative decisions (TN) with the shortest (F = 50.552, p < 0.0001) and these trends were consistent for both color and monochrome displays. Current color medical-grade displays are suitable for primary diagnostic interpretation in clinical radiology.
    Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 03/2011; · 0.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this work, we present a mixed software/hardware implementation of 2-D signals encoder/decoder using dyadic discrete wavelet transform (DWT) based on quadrature mirror filters (QMF); using fast wavelet Mallat's algorithm. This work is designed and compiled on the embedded development kit EDK6.3i, and the synthesis software, ISE6.3i, which is available with Xilinx Virtex-IIV2MB1000 FPGA. Huffman coding scheme is used to encode the wavelet coefficients so that they can be transmitted progressively through an Ethernet TCP/IP based connection. The possible reconfiguration can be exploited to attain higher performance. The design will be integrated with the neutron radiography system that is used with the Es-Salem research reactor.
    Applied radiation and isotopes: including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine 08/2013; 82C:200-210. · 1.09 Impact Factor