Efficacy of PDE-5-inbitors for erectile dysfunction. A comparative meta-analysis of fixed-dose regimen randomized controlled trials administering the International Index of Erectile Function in broad-spectrum populations

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany.
International Journal of Impotence Research (Impact Factor: 1.76). 10/2005; 18(3):229-35. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901395
Source: PubMed


This meta-analytic study aims to estimate the likely improvements of erectile dysfunction (ED) measured by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) at the highest fixed dosages of the three available PDE-5-inhibitors: sildenafil, tadalafil, and vardenafil. MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched electronically for efficacy trials of PDE-5-inhibitors for treating ED. In addition drug manufacturers were contacted to provide unpublished or unrecorded congress proceedings. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, maximum fixed-dose, broad-spectrum efficacy trials using IIEF were included in the analysis. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers. The results were pooled using weighted mean differences. A formal indirect comparison (including Bonferroni-correction) was conducted to estimate the differences between agents. A total of 14 trials were included in the meta-analysis (three with 100 mg sildenafil, eight with 20-25 mg tadalafil, and three with 20 mg vardenafil). All trials were of good methodological quality. Overall heterogeneity was moderate: I(2)=33.2%, chi(2)=19.47, P=0.11. The funnel plot suggested moderate likelihood of publication bias. Pooled results of IIEF-improvement were for sildenafil 9.65 (95% CI: 8.50, 10.79) points, tadalafil 8.52 (7.61, 9.42) points, and vardenafil 7.50 (6.50, 8.50) points, respectively. Sildenafil proved to be significantly more effective than vardenafil (d=2.15, P=0.006), other pairwise comparisons showed no difference in efficacy. All PDE-5-inhibitors are highly effective in the treatment of ED. At maximum dosage they improve erectile function 7-10 points on the IIEF compared to placebo-treatment. There is evidence that sildenafil might be more efficacious than vardenafil, although this is to be interpreted with caution. To prove higher efficacy truly independent comparative trials are needed.

Download full-text


Available from: Levente Kriston, Sep 28, 2014
136 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Medical therapy is the preferred first-line approach in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. The magnitude of the improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms observed in response to combination therapy (alpha-blocker plus 5-alpha reductase inhibitors) does not approach that achieved with prostatectomy. Various drugs have been under consideration, including BXL628, lonidamine, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors, all of which have had unacceptable side effects. The gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cetrorelix is associated with dose-dependent symptom improvement and reduction of prostate volume. Elucidating the mechanism for cetrorelix-mediated improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms will likely contribute to unraveling the pathophysiology of lower urinary tract symptoms in men.
    Reviews in urology 02/2006; 8(4):183-9.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several trials and reviews provide evidence for the efficacy of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). However, little is known about the impact of treatment effect modifiers other than concomitant diseases. Our objective was to identify patient and trial characteristics as well as methodological and publication-related issues that are associated with the treatment effect measured in flexible-dose randomized controlled trials of oral sildenafil for ED. The MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central databases were searched for efficacy trials of sildenafil. Thirteen trials fulfilled all inclusion criteria. A series of meta-regression and graphical analyses were performed to test the impact of possible effect modifiers. Treatment effect was influenced by mean baseline disease severity and mean duration of the disease. These associations were at least partly mediated by placebo response. Trial duration, age of patients and etiology of ED in patients did not have any significant influence on the treatment effect. The year of publication of primary trials was also related to trial findings. Our analysis adds important data to enable the control of confounding variables in future trials and meta-analyses. It might also help the individual to assess the unbiased efficacy and true innovative potential of available and forthcoming pharmacological agents.
    International Journal of Impotence Research 05/2006; 18(6):559-65. DOI:10.1038/sj.ijir.3901479 · 1.76 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As first-line treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED), phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors are highly effective and well tolerated, making it possible for the majority of men with ED to experience better sex in terms of the restoration or improvement of erection rigidity and durability. Better erectile function can also improve the quality of the couple's relationship and the sexual satisfaction of female partners, yet a high proportion of men discontinue treatment even though the use of a PDE5 inhibitor has restored erection rigidity and durability. In the past, research focused on the influence of the drug regimen and side-effects on noncompliance and premature discontinuation. However, it is apparent that health professionals must also provide pretreatment education on the impact of drug therapy on the broader sexual experience for men and their partners, rather than limiting themselves to a discussion of erectile function alone. This education should be further reinforced through adequate and timely follow-up to optimise treatment outcome. In addition, any ED treatment plan must consider the context of a man's relationship with his partner, since a partner's encouragement is often crucial in motivating a man to continue with treatment. The partner's motivation to maintain or return to sexual intimacy, her satisfaction with sex, and his perception of that satisfaction are central to the restoration of a satisfactory sexual experience. These beneficial outcomes can best be achieved by adopting a holistic approach that recognises the complexities of ED, and the importance of the partner's central role in the success of treatment and the experience of better sex.
    European Urology Supplements 09/2006; 5(13-5):779-785. DOI:10.1016/j.eursup.2006.06.006 · 3.37 Impact Factor
Show more