Article

Bonomo, M. et al. Evaluating the therapeutic approach in pregnancies complicated by borderline glucose intolerance: a randomized clinical trial. Diabet. Med. 22, 1536-1541

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Niguarda Ca'Granda Hospital, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 201621 Milan, Italy.
Diabetic Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.06). 12/2005; 22(11):1536-41. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01690.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Most studies relating minor gestational metabolic alterations to macrosomia refer to glucose intolerance classified on the basis of the National Diabetes Data Group or previous World Health Organization diagnostic thresholds. Our aim was to evaluate the consequences of very mild forms of gestational glucose intolerance, defined by an elevated 50-g glucose challenge test followed by a normal oral glucose tolerance test, using the more restrictive Carpenter and Coustan's criteria (Borderline Gestational Glucose Intolerance, BGGI).
Three hundred BGGI women were randomly assigned to: Group A (standard management), Group B (dietary treatment and regular monitoring). A control group (C) was also considered. Newborns were classified as macrosomic, large (LGA), or small for gestational age (SGA).
The three groups were similar in age, body mass index and parity. Therapy in Group B significantly improved fasting (from 4.68 +/- 0.45 to 4.28 +/- 0.45 mmol/l) and 2-h postprandial glycaemia (from 6.01 +/- 0.57 to 5.13 +/- 0.68 mmol/l). Fasting glycaemia at delivery was significantly lower in B (4.20 +/- 0.38 mmol/l) than in A (4.84 +/- 0.45 mmol/l), and was also lower than in C (4.31 +/- 0.39 mmol/l). Significantly fewer LGA babies were born to Group B (6.0%) than Group A (14.0%) and Group C (9.1%). No difference was found in the SGA rate. The neonatal Ponderal Index was higher (P = 0.030) in group A (2.73 +/- 0.35) than in C (2.64 +/- 0.30) and B (2.64 +/- 0.24).
Even very mild alterations in glucose tolerance can result in excessive or disharmonious fetal growth, which may be prevented by simple, non-invasive therapeutic measures.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Antonio Ragusa, Aug 25, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
82 Views
  • Source
    • "It is well established that gestational diabetes causes increased fetal adiposity and high birth weight; therefore, most studies focus on large for gestational age (LGA) infants as an outcome of diabetic pregnancies [11]. However, increased birth weight is not restricted to diabetic pregnancies, as nondiabetic healthy mothers also deliver large babies, and maternal glucose variations, even within the normal range, may predict future metabolic risk [12] [13] [14]. A continuous debate remains regarding maternal factors that predict birth weight in healthy nondiabetic pregnancies with normal glucose tolerance [8] [15] [16]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction. Increased neonatal birth weight (NBW), often associated with diabetic pregnancies, is a recognized indicator of childhood obesity and future metabolic risk. Predictors of NBW in healthy non-diabetic pregnancies are not yet established. Here, we investigated the association of maternal parameters of healthy non-diabetic mothers with NBW of their "appropriate-for-gestational age" neonates. Methods. The study involved 36 healthy mother/infant pairs. Examined parameters included NBW, maternal age, first and last trimester (BMI), weight gain, fasting serum lipids and glucose, 2-hour postload glucose levels and blood pressure. Results. Postload-glucose levels were significantly higher in mothers of heavier neonates. ANOVA results indicated that 15% increase in postload-glucose levels corresponded to more than 0.5 Kg increase in NBW in the third tertile. NBW correlated positively with postload glucose levels, and negatively with systolic blood pressure. Regression analysis showed that the main predictors of NBW were postload-glucose levels (B = 0.455, P = 0.003), followed by systolic blood pressure (B = -0.447, P = 0.004), together predicting 31.7% NBW variation. Conclusion. This study highlights that increased maternal postload sugar levels and blood pressure, within the normal range, highly predicts NBW of healthy mothers. These findings may provide focus for early dietary intervention measures to avoid future risks to the mother and baby.
    09/2013; 2013:757459. DOI:10.1155/2013/757459
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The past 10 years have seen an incredible increase in the number of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pregnancy is no exception, and the alarming rates of diabetes in pregnancy continue to rise. However, the last decade has also seen extraordinary gains, as both our understanding and treatment of this disease have improved dramatically. Although advances have been made in all aspects of diabetes and pregnancy, this article will focus on gestational diabetes (GDM), which currently affects up to 14% of all pregnancies. Research has continued to show that maintaining euglycemia during pregnancy reduces and can even eliminate the risk for GDM complications, such as fetal macrosomia, stillbirth, and congenital malformations. Additionally, normalizing glycemic levels during pregnancy can reduce the risk of offspring of diabetic mothers (ODM) becoming obese and having type 2 diabetes early in life. Although disputed by some, the most compelling data shows maintaining glucose levels that mimic nondiabetic pregnancies results in fewer maternal complications and improves fetal outcome. With the acceptance of postprandial blood glucose levels as the standard indicator for GDM risk, broader prenatal screening, and the use of insulin analogues in pregnancy, glucose control is improving and more women with gestational diabetes are having healthy babies.
    The Endocrinologist 12/2006; 17(1):30-34. DOI:10.1097/01.ten.0000255881.94515.28 · 0.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Impaired glucose tolerance in pregnancy and gestational diabetes are associated with increased maternal and fetal risks. There is considerable uncertainty in the literature relating to the merits of screening for gestational diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance, and variable definitions in the cut-off values to be used. To assess different levels of glucose intolerance in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes. Retrospective cohort study involving screening pregnant women with a 50-g oral glucose load, followed by a formal 75-g oral glucose tolerance test for women who screened positive (defined as a plasma glucose level > or = 7.8 mmol/L). Plasma glucose results were correlated with pregnancy and birth outcomes, and receiver-operator curves were constructed. A total of 16,975 women were screened with a glucose challenge test, with pregnancy outcome information available for 1804 women who screened positive on glucose challenge test. With increasing plasma glucose values, there was a significant increase in pre-eclampsia, Caesarean section, shoulder dystocia and neonatal hypoglycaemia. The risk of adverse maternal and infant pregnancy outcomes increases with increasing levels of glucose impairment despite treatment.
    Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 09/2007; 47(4):307-12. DOI:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2007.00743.x · 1.62 Impact Factor
Show more