Terracciano A, McCrae RR, Brant LJ, Costa Jr PT. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of NEO-PI-R scales in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Psychol Aging 20: 493-506

Laboratory of Personality and Cognition, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Baltimore, MD 21224-6825, USA.
Psychology and Aging (Impact Factor: 2.73). 10/2005; 20(3):493-506. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.3.493
Source: PubMed


The authors examined age trends in the 5 factors and 30 facets assessed by the Revised NEO Personality Inventory in Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging data (N=1,944; 5,027 assessments) collected between 1989 and 2004. Consistent with cross-sectional results, hierarchical linear modeling analyses showed gradual personality changes in adulthood: a decline in Neuroticism up to age 80, stability and then decline in Extraversion, decline in Openness, increase in Agreeableness, and increase in Conscientiousness up to age 70. Some facets showed different curves from the factor they define. Birth cohort effects were modest, and there were no consistent Gender x Age interactions. Significant nonnormative changes were found for all 5 factors; they were not explained by attrition but might be due to genetic factors, disease, or life experience.

Download full-text


Available from: Paul Costa, Jan 19, 2014
27 Reads
    • "In a rigorous study using 6-year data from the Victoria Longitudinal Study, Small et al. (2003) found that age (and also sex) was associated only with increases in neuroticism. Using longer-term (1989–2004) longitudinal data from 1944 participants in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, Terracciano et al. (2005) found that (1) neuroticism declined up until approximately age 80 and then began to increase again; (2) most facets of extraversion, openness to experience, and conscientiousness declined in later life; and (3) agreeableness generally increased in later life. Not all facets of a factor showed identical patterns of change, however, and differences in change as a function of sex were small. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Unlabelled: Background/Study Context: We demonstrate that observer-rated factor structure of personality in centenarians is congruent with the normative structure. Prevalence of cognitive impairment, which has previously been linked to changes in personality in younger samples, is high in this age group, requiring observer ratings to obtain valid data in a population-based context. Likewise, the broad range of cognitive functioning necessitates synthesis of results across multiple measures of cognitive performance. Methods and results: Data from 161 participants in the Georgia Centenarian Study (GCS; MAge = 100.3 years, 84% women, 20% African American, 40% community-dwelling, 30% low cognitive functioning) support strong overall correspondence with reference structure (full sample: .94; higher cognitive functioning: .94; lower cognitive functioning: .90). Centenarians with lower cognitive functioning are higher on neuroticism and lower on openness to experience, agreeableness, and conscientiousness. Facet-level differences (higher N1-N6: anxiety, hostility, depression, self-consciousness, impulsiveness, vulnerability to stress; lower E1: warmth; lower O4-O6: actions, ideas, values; lower A1, A3, A4: trust, altruism, compliance; C1, C5: competence, self-discipline) are also observed. Multivariate factor-level models indicate only neuroticism of the five broad factors predicts membership in cognitively impaired group; facet-level models showed that lower-order scales from three of the five domains were significant. Centenarians with higher self-consciousness (N4), impulsiveness (N5), and deliberation (C6) but lower ideas (O5), compliance (A4), and self-discipline (C5) were more likely to be in the lower cognitive functioning category. Conclusion: Results present first normative population-based data for personality structure in centenarians and offer intriguing possibilities for the role of personality in cognitive impairment centered on neuroticism.
    Experimental Aging Research 07/2015; 41(4):361-85. DOI:10.1080/0361073X.2015.1053752 · 0.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The data collected within APPOC were compared with data from two published studies: (a) NEO-PI-R informant ratings of college-age and adult targets from the 50 cultures of the PPOC project (McCrae & Terracciano, 2005a), and (b) NEO-PI-R selfreport data from college-age and adult respondents from 25 cultures (Costa et al., 2001). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although large international studies have found consistent patterns of sex differences in personality traits among adults (i.e., women scoring higher on most facets), less is known about cross-cultural sex differences in adolescent personality and the role of culture and age in shaping them. The present study examines the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (McCrae, Costa, & Martin, 2005) informant ratings of adolescents from 23 cultures (N = 4,850), and investigates culture and age as sources of variability in sex differences of adolescents' personality. The effect for Neuroticism (with females scoring higher than males) begins to take on its adult form around age 14. Girls score higher on Openness to Experience and Conscientiousness at all ages between 12 and 17 years. A more complex pattern emerges for Extraversion and Agreeableness, although by age 17, sex differences for these traits are highly similar to those observed in adulthood. Cross-sectional data suggest that (a) with advancing age, sex differences found in adolescents increasingly converge toward adult patterns with respect to both direction and magnitude; (b) girls display sex-typed personality traits at an earlier age than boys; and (c) the emergence of sex differences was similar across cultures. Practical implications of the present findings are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 01/2015; 108(1):171-85. DOI:10.1037/a0038497 · 5.08 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Across studies, neuroticism shows a negative linear trend across adulthood, and it has been suggested that this reflects a variety of changes that may continue to occur across most of adulthood, including increases in competence, vocational success, and emotional regulation abilities (e.g., Allemand et al. 2008; Roberts et al. 2006; Soto et al. 2011; Srivastava et al. 2003). There is also evidence of gender differences in the relationship between age and neuroticism, although findings are frequently inconsistent across studies (e.g., Lucas and Donnellan 2009; Soto et al. 2011; Srivastava et al. 2003; Terracciano et al. 2005; van Branje et al. 2007; Donnellan and Lucas 2008; see Roberts et al. 2006 for a meta-analysis), and so the analyses of interactions of age with gender are exploratory in the current study. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A sizeable body of research suggests that self-definition and relatedness represent two fundamental developmental streams across the lifespan (Blatt in Psychoanal Study Child 29:107–157, 1974; Blatt and Luyten in Dev Psychopathol 21:793–814, 2009). Adverse developmental experiences have been found to affect personality development leading to high levels of self-criticism or dependency. No research to date has examined the developmental trends of these factors across the lifespan or the moderating impact of important life experiences. In a sample of 3,586 Canadians aged 18–59, age-related differences in self-criticism and dependency were examined. Analyses were replicated in a multicultural sample of 612 Canadians and 647 individuals born and currently living on the continent of Asia. Controlling for both neuroticism and depressive symptoms, results showed that self-criticism and dependency decreased linearly across the lifespan in both samples and across cultures; however, the decrease in self-criticism was steeper for men compared to women, while the decrease in dependency was steeper for those without children compared to those with children. Furthermore, participants who were in a romantic relationship showed lower levels of self-criticism and higher levels of dependency compared to those who were not in a romantic relationship. Results suggest that people may develop a healthier view of close relationships with others and acquire more positive self-views over the course of their lives.
    Journal of Adult Development 09/2013; 20(3). DOI:10.1007/s10804-013-9163-9 · 0.60 Impact Factor
Show more