Article

Is obesity stigmatizing? Body weight, perceived discrimination, and psychological well-being in the United States.

Department of Sociology, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, 30 College Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Journal of Health and Social Behavior (Impact Factor: 2.72). 10/2005; 46(3):244-59. DOI: 10.1177/002214650504600303
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We investigate the frequency and psychological correlates of institutional and interpersonal discrimination reported by underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese I, and obese II/III Americans. Analyses use data from the Midlife Development in the United States study, a national survey of more than 3,000 adults ages 25 to 74 in 1995. Compared to normal weight persons, obese II/III persons (body mass index of 35 or higher) are more likely to report institutional and day-to-day interpersonal discrimination. Among obese II/III persons, professional workers are more likely than nonprofessionals to report employment discrimination and interpersonal mistreatment. Obese II/III persons report lower levels of self-acceptance than normal weight persons, yet this relationship is fully mediated by the perception that one has been discriminated against due to body weight or physical appearance. Our findings offer further support for the pervasive stigma of obesity and the negative implications of stigmatized identities for life chances.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
104 Views
  • Source
    Sarah E Jackson, Rebecca J Beeken, Jane Wardle
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To examine whether the adverse effect of obesity on psychological well-being can be explained by weight discrimination. Methods: The study sample included 5056 older (50 y) men and women living in England and participating in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Participants reported experiences of weight discrimination in everyday life and completed measures of quality of life (CASP-19 scale), life satisfaction (Satisfaction With Life Scale), and depressive symptoms (eight-item CES-D scale). Height and weight were objectively measured, with obesity defined as BMI 30 kg/m 2. Mediation analyses were used to test the role of perceived weight discrimination in the relationship between obesity and each psychological factor. Results: Obesity, weight discrimination, and psychological well-being were all significantly interrelated. Mediation models revealed significant indirect effects of obesity through perceived weight discrimination on quality of life (b 5 20.072, SE 5 0.008), life satisfaction (b 5 20.038, SE 5 0.008), and depressive symptoms (b 5 0.057, SE 5 0.008), with perceived weight discrimination explaining approximately 40% (range: 39.5-44.1%) of the total association between obesity and psychological well-being. Conclusions: Perceived weight discrimination explains a substantial proportion of the association between obesity and psychological well-being in English older adults. Efforts to reduce weight stigma in society could help to reduce the psychological burden of obesity.
    Obesity 01/2015; DOI:10.1002/oby.21052 · 4.39 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Weight bias often results in the social exclusion of individuals with obesity. The direct, short-term psychological effects of social exclusion in obesity have not been investigated yet. This study experimentally tests whether social exclusion elicits stronger negative emotions in individuals with obesity compared to normal-weight controls. Specifically, we test whether social exclusion has a specific impact on shame. In total, N=299 individuals (n=130 with body mass index [BMI]≤30 and n=169 with BMI>30) were randomly assigned to a social exclusion condition or a control condition that was implemented with an online Cyberball paradigm. Before and after, they filled out questionnaires assessing state emotionality. Social exclusion increased negative emotionality in both groups compared to the control condition (p<0.001) according to a multivariate ANOVA. However, the interaction of group and social exclusion was also significant (p=0.035) and arose from a significant, specific increase of shame in the group with obesity during social exclusion (p<0.001, Cohen's d=0.7). When faced with social exclusion, individuals with obesity do not respond with more intensive negative emotions in general compared to controls, but with a specific increase in shame. As social exclusion is frequent in individuals with obesity, psychological interventions focussing shame-related emotional distress could be crucial. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Eating Behaviors 01/2015; 17C. DOI:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.01.001 · 1.58 Impact Factor
  • International journal of adolescence and youth 12/2013; DOI:10.1080/02673843.2013.800567

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
42 Downloads
Available from
May 20, 2014