Value of body fat mass vs anthropometric obesity indices in the assessment of metabolic risk factors

Institut für Humanernährung und Lebensmittelkunde, Christian-Albrechts Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
International Journal of Obesity (Impact Factor: 5.39). 04/2006; 30(3):475-83. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803144
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To compare the value of body fat mass (%FM) to indirect measures of general (body mass index (BMI)) and central adiposity (waist circumference (WC); waist-to-height ratio (WC/ht)) for the prediction of overweight- and obesity-related metabolic risk in a study population with a high prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MSX).
BMI, WC, WC/ht, body composition (by air-displacement plethysmography) and metabolic risk factors: triglycerides, cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), uric acid, systolic blood pressure (BPsys), insulin resistance by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured in 335 adults (191 women, 144 men; mean age 53 +/-13.9 years, prevalence of MSX 30%).
When compared with BMI and WC, %FM showed weaker associations with metabolic risk factors, except for CRP and BPsys in men. In women, HDL-C and HOMA-IR showed the closest correlations with BMI. For all other risk factors, WC or WC/ht were the best predictors in both sexes. Differences in the strength of correlations between an obesity index and different risk factors exceeded the differences observed between all obesity indices within one risk factor. In stepwise multiple regression analyses, WC/ht was the main predictor of metabolic risk in both sexes combined. However, analysis of the area under receiver operating characteristic curves for prediction of the prevalence of >or=2 component traits of the MSX revealed a similar accuracy of all obesity indices.
At the population level, measurement of body FM has no advantage over BMI and WC in the prediction of obesity-related metabolic risk. Although measures of central adiposity (WC, WC/ht) tended to show closer associations with risk factors than measures of general adiposity, the differences were small and depended on the type of risk factor and sex, suggesting an equivalent value of methods.

Download full-text


Available from: Simone Onur, Mar 11, 2014
  • Source
    • "Although WC is highly correlated with abdominal visceral fat, it is also correlated with total and subcutaneous fat depot [40]. Moreover, WHtR and BMI were more correlated with each other compared with percent of body fat [41]. Therefore, BMI and WHtR as indices of general and central obesity would have some limitations. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several studies have concluded a positive association between abdominal obesity, general obesity, and chronic diseases. However, the best anthropometric measures to predict the risk for chronic diseases should be clarified in each population. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the predictive power of A Body Shape Index (ABSI), body mass index (BMI), and waist-to-height ratio and Clinica Universidad de Navarra-Body Adiposity Estimator for metabolic syndrome (MetS) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks among Iranians in different age and sex categories. This population-based cross-sectional study conducted on 9555 individuals, ages ≥19 y. Anthropometric measures, blood pressure, and biochemical markers were measured using standard protocols. Hypertension, hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were considered as the CVD risks. Mean (SD) of age and BMI of participants were 38.7 y (mean 15.5) and 25.7 kg/m(2) (mean 4.6), respectively. ABSI demonstrated the weakest correlations and lowest area under curve (AUC) for various risk factors and MetS. However, the highest odds ratio was observed for ABSI and MetS in different age and sex categories. Based on the AUC, we concluded that ABSI is a weak predictor for CVD risks and MetS. More studies are needed to determine the best predictor of CVD risk among the Iranian population.
    Nutrition 06/2014; 30(6):636-44. DOI:10.1016/j.nut.2013.10.021 · 3.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Waist circumference (WC) is an adiposity measure that, if properly adjusted by some power of height [2], can add predictive ability of childhood body weight to adult blood pressure [4] [5]. Several recent studies have found that waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) is better than WC at predicting obesity, overweight [6], cardiovascular risk factors [7] and mortality [8], is better than BMI at predicting hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia [9], metabolic syndrome [10] and its risk factors [11], type II diabetes [12] and cardiovascular risk factors [7], and is better than waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) at predicting cardiovascular risk factors [7] and mortality[8]. WHtR also has the added benefit of not requiring adjustment for age or sex [13], though that may still be done. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While researchers are increasingly recognizing the importance of adjusting waist circumference (WC) for height, no standard has yet been established. In this study we contrast three standard methods for indexing WC by height (using height, root-height and height-squared) via comparisons with age-specific optimal indices.
    Open Journal of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases 08/2012; 2(3):40-48. DOI:10.4236/ojemd.2012.23006
  • Source
    • "Adverse levels of CVD risk factors are associated with estimates of body fatness obtained from skinfold thicknesses (Spiegelman et al. 1992), bioelectrical impedance (Richelsen and Pedersen 1995; Nagaya et al. 1999; Wannamethee et al. 2005; Willett et al. 2006; Hemmingsson et al. 2009; Lee et al. 2008), DXA (Hemmingsson et al. 2009; Lee et al. 2008), air-displacement plethysmography (Bosy-Westphal et al. 2006) and underwater weighing (Spiegelman et al. 1992). Although BMI provides a less accurate estimate of body fatness than do these other methods (Bray et al. 2002), our results indicate that levels of various risk factors are as strongly related to BMI as to the triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although adverse levels of cardiovascular disease risk factors are related to skinfold thicknesses and BMI among adults, the relative strengths of these associations are unknown. We examine whether the triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses are more strongly related to adult levels of lipids, fasting insulin and blood pressure than BMI. Cross-sectional (n =3318) and longitudinal (n =1593) analyses of 18- to 44-year-olds examined in the Bogalusa Heart Study from 1983 to 2002. Principal components analysis was used to derive a summary index of the six examined risk factors (triglycerides, low- and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, insulin, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures). The magnitudes of the differences were generally small, but all comparisons indicated that BMI was at least as strongly related to adverse risk factor levels as was the sum of subscapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses (SF sum). For example, adjusted cross-sectional associations with the risk factor summary were r = 0.55 (BMI) and r = 0.49 (SF sum), p < 0.001 for difference between correlations. Similar differences were seen in longitudinal analyses, with changes in the risk factor summary being more strongly associated with changes in BMI (r =0.50) than with changes in the SF sum (r = 0.38). BMI appears to be at least as accurate as skinfold thicknesses in identifying metabolic risk among adults. The advantages of BMI should be considered in the design and interpretation of clinical and epidemiologic studies.
    Annals of Human Biology 05/2010; 37(6):726-37. DOI:10.3109/03014461003641849 · 1.15 Impact Factor
Show more