Article

Integrated substance use and mental health treatment for adolescents: aligning organizational and financial incentives.

University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (Impact Factor: 3.07). 11/2005; 15(5):826-34. DOI: 10.1089/cap.2005.15.826
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The high prevalence of the dual diagnosis of mental and substance use disorders (SUD) has been increasingly documented for both adolescents and adults (Crowley and Riggs 1995; Kandel et al. 1999; Whitmore et al. 1997). For more than a decade, the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) has included integrated treatment of comorbid psychiatric disorders as one of nine core treatment principles (National Institute on Drug Abuse 1999). Despite empirically supported practice guidelines, implementation of integrated treatment has been slow (New Freedom Commission on Mental Health 2003; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1999). In response to the growing call for integrated treatments and systems of care, this paper: (1) identifies systemic and economic barriers that have impeded widespread implementation of integrated care for adolescents with co-occurring SUD, specifically the supply of treatment providers, shifting priorities of gatekeepers to specialty care, and financing streams; and (2) describes possibilities for aligning economic incentives in order to facilitate the dissemination and implementation of integrated care for adolescents with co-occurring SUD.

0 Followers
 · 
51 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examined the relationship between Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA) participation with treatment engagement, retention, and satisfaction, and with substance use and emotional problem outcomes. Participants had substance use disorders (SUD) only or co-occurring substance use and psychiatric problems. Those with co-occurring problems reported more days of substance use and emotional problems at intake to treatment than those with SUD only. All groups received equivalent exposure to A-CRA during treatment implementation. At the 12-month follow-up, adolescents classified as externalizers (n = 468) or those with both externalizing and internalizing problems (n = 674) had significantly greater improvement in their days of abstinence and substance problems relative to adolescents with substance use disorders only (n = 666). Additionally, adolescents reporting symptoms of internalizing (n = 154), externalizing, or both externalizing and internalizing disorders had significantly greater improvements in days of emotional problems relative to adolescents with SUD only.
    Journal of substance abuse treatment 01/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.jsat.2013.10.013 · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background:Depression and problematic substance use represent two of the major social and health problems facing young people internationally. Frequently, these conditions co-occur and this co-occurrence is associated with greater functional impact, poorer treatment outcomes, and increased costs to both society and the individual. Objective:This review aims to identify peer-reviewed published trials of interventions for co-occurring substance use and depression delivered to young people, describe these interventions, and critique the methodological quality of the studies. Method: Eleven electronic databases were searched. The reference lists of relevant review papers were searched manually for additional studies not identified by the electronic database search. Results: Initially, 1,976 studies were identified, of which 22 were classified as trial studies of youth-based treatment interventions for co-occurring substance use and depression. Ten of these studies met criteria for review. The majority (60%) utilized a pharmacotherapy component, but found it to be generally no better than placebo when both groups received adjunct counselling. Methodological quality of studies varied. Conclusions:There is a dearth of trials of interventions for co-occurring depression and substance use disorders in young people. The limited data available is promising regarding the overall effectiveness of a psychological counselling approach.Given the importance of early intervention, and the difficulties faced when engaging youth in treatment, there is a need for further focused effort amongst this group. This may require more innovative techniques in intervention design and implementation. Recent advances in Internet- and mobile phone-based therapies present apotential avenue for further research.
    Current Drug Abuse Reviews 10/2014; DOI:10.2174/1874473707666141015220608