Article

Use of air-cleaning devices to create airborne particle-free spaces intended to alleviate allergic rhinitis and asthma during sleep.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory for Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow Practice, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455-0111, USA.
Indoor Air (Impact Factor: 4.2). 01/2006; 15(6):420-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00387.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Comprehensive quantitative experiments were performed to assess the capabilities of several air-cleaning devices to create a particle-free microenvironment as a therapy for sleeping persons affected by allergic rhinitis and asthma. Six devices were evaluated, of which five were portable and intended to provide general air cleaning for bedroom-sized spaces. The sixth was intended for installation in front of the headboard of a bed and was designed to provide clean air focused in a space occupied by a sleeping person. The air-cleaning methods of the selected devices included high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtering and electrostatic precipitation. Particle concentration measurements for six particle-size ranges and sound intensity measurements were made during 8-h, sleep-simulating periods. The effects of four parameters were studied: (i) device location, (ii) controlled air motion in the laboratory, (iii) airflow rate setting of the air-cleaning device, and (iv) controlled disturbances. To ensure a totally objective study, a special laboratory facility was constructed which enabled complete control of the experimental conditions. The measured concentration histories provided comprehensive evidence of the relative capabilities of the various devices for the specific air-cleaning function. It was found that the device designed to focus the cleaned air in the sleeping space fulfilled its goal and, in that regard, was clearly superior to all of the other air-cleaning devices. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: There is evidence that allergic reactions are triggered by the presence of airborne particles and that these reactions can be mitigated by particle removal. This strategy can be implemented by the use of air-cleaning devices which are capable of creating particle-free zones at locations where human activity occurs. In particular, the creation of a particle-free zone which encompasses the breathing space of a sleeping person holds promise of mitigating sleep-disturbing allergic reactions.

0 Followers
 · 
88 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction We breathe about 13 cubic meters of air each day, and many of the particles in the air deposit in our lungs. Hundreds of studies worldwide have documented increases in morbidity and mortality associated with increases in particle levels outdoors. However, people spend almost 90% of their time indoors, and indoor air has its own list of sources that may be as bad or worse than outdoors—for example, cigarette smoke. Therefore much interest lies in developing ways to clean indoor air. One way to improve indoor air quality is to use an air cleaner. Air cleaners have been sold for many years, but it is important to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing pollutants in the home. Therefore Health Canada has sponsored this review of the effectiveness of air cleaners in homes. Although pollutants include gases as well as particles, this review concentrates on particle air cleaners.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The evidence of health benefits of particle filtration in homes and commercial buildings is reviewed. Prior reviews of papers published before 2000 are summarized. The results of 16 more recent intervention studies are compiled and analyzed. Also reviewed are four studies that modeled health benefits of using filtration to reduce indoor exposures to particles from outdoors. Prior reviews generally concluded that particle filtration is, at best, a source of small improvements in allergy and asthma health effects; however, many early studies had weak designs. A majority of recent intervention studies employed strong designs and more of these studies report statistically significant improvements in health symptoms or objective health outcomes, particularly for subjects with allergies or asthma. The percentage improvement in health outcomes is typically modest, e.g., 7% to 25%. Delivery of filtered air to the breathing zone of sleeping allergic or asthmatic persons may be more consistently effective in improving health than room air filtration. Notable are two studies that report statistically significant improvements, with filtration, in markers that predict future adverse coronary events. From modeling, the largest potential benefits of indoor particle filtration may be reductions in morbidity and mortality from reducing indoor exposures to particles from outdoor air. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
    Indoor Air 02/2013; 23(5). DOI:10.1111/ina.12036 · 4.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A novel method for determining whole house particle removal and clean air delivery rates attributable to central and portable ventilation/air cleaning systems is described. The method is used to characterize total and air-cleaner-specific particle removal rates during operation of four in-duct air cleaners and two portable air-cleaning devices in a fully instrumented test home. Operation of in-duct and portable air cleaners typically increased particle removal rates over the baseline rates determined in the absence of operating a central fan or an indoor air cleaner. Removal rates of 0.3- to 0.5-μm particles ranged from 1.5 hr during operation of an in-duct, 5-in. pleated media filter to 7.2 hr for an in-duct electrostatic air cleaner in comparison to a baseline rate of 0 hr when the air handler was operating without a filter. Removal rates for total particulate matter less than 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) mass concentrations were 0.5 hr under baseline conditions, 0.5 hr during operation of three portable ionic air cleaners, 1 hr for an in-duct 1-in. media filter, 2.4 hr for a single high-efficiency particle arrestance (HEPA) portable air cleaner, 4.6 hr for an in-duct 5-in. media filter, 4.7 hr during operation of five portable HEPA filters, 6.1 hr for a conventional in-duct electronic air cleaner, and 7.5 hr for a high efficiency in-duct electrostatic air cleaner. Corresponding whole house clean air delivery rates for PM2.5 attributable to the air cleaner independent of losses within the central ventilation system ranged from 2 m/min for the conventional media filter to 32 m/min for the high efficiency in-duct electrostatic device. Except for the portable ionic air cleaner, the devices considered here increased particle removal indoors over baseline deposition rates.
    Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995) 01/2008; 58(11):1474-1482. · 1.17 Impact Factor

Preview (2 Sources)

Download
0 Downloads
Available from