The composition of surrogate alcohols consumed in Russia.

European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research (Impact Factor: 3.31). 11/2005; 29(10):1884-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In the course of a case-control study examining determinants of premature death among working age men, it became clear that a significant percentage of the population (7.3%) were drinking a variety of surrogate alcohol products (products not legally sold for consumption). In this population, where there is a high death rate from alcohol-related causes, including acute alcohol poisoning, it was important to know what these products contained.
The identity of products being consumed was identified from the survey of controls. Representative samples were obtained and subjected to analysis using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry to determine their composition.
Three broad groups of product were identified: samogon (home-produced spirits); medicinal compounds; and other spirits (mainly sold as aftershaves). Commercially produced vodkas were used for comparison. Samogon contained lower quantities of ethanol than vodka [mean, 39 vs. 44 volumetric percentage (v/v%), respectively] but in addition contained certain toxic long-chain alcohols. Medicinal compounds contained only ethanol, at a higher concentration that vodka (mean, 66 v/v%), while the other spirits, which were also essentially pure ethanol, contained a mean of 94 v/v%.
A significant number of Russian men are drinking products that have either very high concentrations of ethanol or contaminants known to be toxic. These products are untaxed and thus much less expensive than vodka. There is an urgent need for policy responses that target their production and consumption.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess whether alcohol-related community characteristics act collectively to influence individual-level alcohol consumption in the former Soviet Union (fSU). Methods and results Using multi-level data from nine countries in the fSU we conducted a factor analysis of seven alcohol-related community characteristics. The association between any latent factors underlying these characteristics and two measures of hazardous alcohol consumption was then analysed using a population average regression modelling approach. Our factor analysis produced one factor with an eigenvalue >1 (EV=1.28), which explained 94% of the variance. This factor was statistically significantly associated with increased odds of CAGE problem drinking (OR=1.40 (1.08–1.82)). The estimated association with EHD was not statistically significant (OR=1.10 (0.85–1.44)). Conclusions Our findings suggest that a high number of beer, wine and spirit advertisements and high alcohol outlet density may work together to create an ‘alcogenic’ environment that encourages hazardous alcohol consumption in the fSU.
    Health & Place 05/2014; 27:205–211. · 2.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Alcoholism 01/2014; 50(1):25-34.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper, we estimate price elasticities of demand of several types of alcoholic drinks, using 14 rounds of data from the Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey-HSE, collected from 1994 until 2009. We deal with potential confounding problems by taking advantage of a large number of control variables, as well as by estimating community fixed effect models. All in all, although alcohol prices do appear to influence consumption behaviour in Russia, in most cases the size of effect is modest. The finding that two particularly problematic drinks-cheap vodka and fortified wine-are substitute goods also suggests that increasing their prices may not lead to smaller alcohol consumption. Therefore, any alcohol pricing policies in Russia must be supplemented with other measures, such as restrictions on numbers of sales outlets or their opening times.
    The European Journal of Health Economics 02/2014; · 2.10 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 2, 2014