Article

Does the addition of glutamine to enteral feeds affect patient mortality?

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Critical Care Medicine (Impact Factor: 6.15). 12/2005; 33(11):2501-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000185643.02676.D3
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Studies have failed to consistently demonstrate improved survival in intensive care unit (ICU) patients receiving immune-modulating nutrient-enhanced enteral feeds when compared with standard enteral feeds. The objective was to study in a prospective fashion the effects of adding glutamine to standard or immune-modulated (supplemented with omega-3 fatty acids, beta-carotene, and amino acids such as glutamine and arginine) tube feeds.
Prospective, unblinded study using sequential allocation.
A university surgical trauma ICU.
All surgical and trauma patients admitted to the surgical trauma ICU at a university hospital over a 3-yr period who were to receive enteral feeds (n = 185).
Sequential assignment to three isocaloric, isonitrogenous diets was performed as follows: standard 1-kcal/mL feeds with added protein (group 1), standard feeds with the addition of 20-40 g/day (0.6 g/kg/day) glutamine (group 2), or an immune-modulated formula with similar addition of glutamine (group 3). The goal for all patients was 25-30 kcal/kg/day and 2 g/kg/day protein.
Patients were followed until discharge from the hospital. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality, and multiple secondary end points were recorded. In-hospital mortality for group 1 was 6.3% (four of 64) vs. 16.9% (ten of 59, p = .09) for group 2 and 16.1% (ten of 62, p = .09) for group 3. After controlling for age and severity of illness, the difference in mortality between patients receiving standard tube feeds and all patients receiving glutamine was not significant (p < or = .11). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for secondary end points.
The addition of glutamine to standard enteral feeds or to an immunomodulatory formula did not improve outcomes. These findings suggest that enteral glutamine should not be routinely administered to patients with surgical critical illness.

0 Followers
 · 
142 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dit is het tweede artikel over ondervoeding op de IC. In het vorige artikel kwam vooral het nut van voeden op de IC ter sprake.
    4(3):100-102. DOI:10.1007/BF03063212
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is well documented that tertiary peritonitis is associated with different microbiological flora and worse outcomes than secondary peritonitis. It is unknown, however, if these differences can be explained simply by the nosocomial nature of tertiary peritonitis and underlying severity of illness. We reviewed all episodes of intraabdominal infection on the inpatient surgical services at a university hospital over a 46-month period. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were used to compare 91 episodes of secondary peritonitis that progressed to tertiary peritonitis (recurrent diffuse or localized intraabdominal infection) to all episodes of secondary peritonitis (n = 453) to identify predictors for developing tertiary peritonitis. Logistic regression was also used to identify predictors of mortality among patients with secondary (n = 473) or tertiary peritonitis (n = 129). Of 602 episodes of intraabdominal infection identified, there were 473 episodes of secondary peritonitis, including 20 patients who died within seven days of diagnosis. A total of 129 episodes of tertiary peritonitis were identified, of which 91 were preceded by a single episode of secondary peritonitis, and 38 were preceded by an episode of secondary peritonitis and at least one prior episode of tertiary peritonitis. Tertiary peritonitis was associated with a high APACHE II score (14.9 +/- 0.7), pancreatic or small bowel source, drainage only at initial intervention, gram-positive and fungal pathogens, and a high mortality rate (19%). Increasing APACHE II score (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.16, p = 0.0009) independently predicted progression from secondary to tertiary peritonitis while increasing age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99, p = 0.01) and appendiceal source (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.68, p = 0.02) predicted non-progression to tertiary peritonitis. Independent predictors of mortality in this population included increasing age (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.1, p < 0.001), increasing APACHE II score (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.3, p < 0.001), and four comorbidities: cerebrovascular disease (OR 4.3, 95% CI 1.4-13.1, p = 0.01), malignant disease (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.3-6.5, p = 0.01), hemodialysis dependency (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.3-11.2, p = 0.02), and liver disease (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.6-15.1, p = 0.03). Tertiary peritonitis was not an independent predictor of mortality. We were unable to demonstrate, when compared to secondary peritonitis, that tertiary peritonitis is a significant independent predictor of mortality when other variables are taken into account. This suggests that the high mortality associated with tertiary peritonitis is more a function of the patient population in which it occurs than the severity of the pathologic process itself.
    Surgical Infections 12/2001; 2(4):255-63; discussion 264-5. DOI:10.1089/10962960152813296 · 1.72 Impact Factor
  • Critical Care Medicine 12/2005; 33(11):2692-4. DOI:10.1097/01.CCM.0000186750.06199.0F · 6.15 Impact Factor
Show more