Article

Energy requirements during pregnancy and lactation

USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Public Health Nutrition (Impact Factor: 2.48). 11/2005; 8(7A):1010-27. DOI: 10.1079/PHN2005793
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To estimate the energy requirements of pregnant and lactating women consistent with optimal pregnancy outcome and adequate milk production.
Total energy cost of pregnancy was estimated using the factorial approach from pregnancy-induced increments in basal metabolic rate measured by respiratory calorimetry or from increments in total energy expenditure measured by the doubly labelled water method, plus energy deposition attributed to protein and fat accretion during pregnancy.
Database on changes in basal metabolic rate and total energy expenditure during pregnancy, and increments in protein based on measurements of total body potassium, and fat derived from multi-compartment body composition models was compiled. Energy requirements during lactation were derived from rates of milk production, energy density of human milk, and energy mobilisation from tissues.
Healthy pregnant and lactating women.
The estimated total cost of pregnancy for women with a mean gestational weight gain of 12.0 kg, was 321 or 325 MJ, distributed as 375, 1200, 1950 kJ day(-1), for the first, second and third trimesters, respectively. For exclusive breastfeeding, the energy cost of lactation was 2.62 MJ day(-1) based on a mean milk production of 749 g day(-1), energy density of milk of 2.8 kJ g(-1), and energetic efficiency of 0.80. In well-nourished women, this may be subsidised by energy mobilisation from tissues on the order of 0.72 MJ day(-1), resulting in a net increment of 1.9 MJ day(-1) over non-pregnant, non-lactating energy requirements.
Recommendations for energy intake of pregnant and lactating women should be updated based on recently available data.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Janet King, Aug 17, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
325 Views
  • Source
    • "In our study, crude analyses indicated that both short (≤11 mo) and long (≥60 mo) intervals were associated with elevated OR for LBW in comparison to the interval equal to 18-23 months, but after adjustment for maternal and infant characteristics these associations did not reach the level of statistical significance. It should be noted that IPI is not the best measure of whether a mother has had a chance to recover from the pregnancy, in terms of replenishing her nutritional status, because nutritional burden on the mother between pregnancies depends on the extent of breastfeeding (Butte and King, 2005; Dufour and Sauther, 2002; Jasienska, 2013). It was suggested that the " recuperative interval " (duration of the non-pregnant, non-lactating interval) instead, would be a more sensitive measure of maternal ability to recover from the previous reproductive event (Dewey and Cohen, 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Short interpregnancy intervals (IPI) and high parity may be synergistically associated with the risk of unfavorable pregnancy outcomes. This study tests if the effect of short IPI on the odds ratio for low birth weight (LBW, <2,500 g) differs across parity status. The study was carried out on the birth registry sample of almost 40,000 singleton, live-born infants who were delivered between the years 1995 and 2009 to multiparous mothers whose residence at the time of infant's birth was the city of Krakow. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used for testing the effect of IPI on the odds ratio (OR) for LBW, after controlling for employment, educational and marital status, parity, sex of the child, maternal and gestational age. Stratified analyses (according to parity) and tests for interaction were performed. Very short IPI (0-5 months) was associated with an increased OR for LBW, but only among high parity mothers with three or more births (OR = 2.64; 95% CI 1.45-4.80). The test for interaction between very short IPI and parity on the OR for LBW was statistically significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons (P = 0.04). Among low parity mothers (two births) no statistically significant associations were found between IPI and LBW after standardization. Parity may modify the association between short birth spacing and LBW. Women with very short IPI and high parity may have a higher risk of having LBW infants than those with very short IPI but low parity. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    American Journal of Human Biology 03/2015; in press. DOI:10.1002/ajhb.22708 · 1.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Evidence showed that child-bearing during adolescence hinder growth and nutritional status of the adolescent girls (Rah et al., 2008). Nutrition in pregnancy demands extra care due to the growing foetus, placing a high demand on the mother's energy, protein and micronutrients (Butte and King, 2005). Good nutrition is the best way to prevent anaemia during pregnancy but young still-growing women are highly disadvantaged due to competition for nutrients between the mother and the foetus (Scholl et al., 1994). "
    Acta Tropica 12/2014; 144. DOI:10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.12.009 · 2.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "According to a meta-analysis of long-term weight loss in adults in general, approximately half of the weight loss achieved in successful weight loss programs was regained when the first year after treatment ended [7]. Considering the increased energy requirements of lactation [8,9] as well as new routines and new habits in relation to the caring of the newborn, the postpartum period may be a good opportunity to improve eating habits and lose weight in a more sustainable manner. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Overweight and obesity among young, adult women are increasing problems in Sweden as in many other countries. The postpartum period may be a good opportunity to improve eating habits and lose weight in a sustainable manner. The aim was to make a cost-utility analysis of a dietary behavior modification treatment alongside usual care, compared to usual care alone, among lactating overweight and obese women. This study was a cost-utility analysis based on a randomized controlled and longitudinal clinical diet intervention. Between 2007-2010, 68 women living in Sweden were, after baseline measurement at 8-12 weeks postpartum, randomly assigned to a 12-week dietary behavior modification treatment or control group. Inclusion criteria were: self-reported pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) 25-35 kg/m2, non-smoker, singleton term delivery, birth weight > 2500 g, intention to breastfeed for 6 mo and no diseases (mother and child). The women in the intervention group received 1.5 hour of individual counseling at study start and 1 hour at follow-up home visits after 6 weeks of intervention, with support through cell phone text messages every two wk. Dietary intervention aimed to reduce dietary intake by 500 kcal/day. The control group received usual care. Weight results have previously been reported. Here we report on analyses carried out during 2012-2013 of cost per quality adjusted life years (QALY), based on the changes in quality of life measured by EQ-5D-3 L and SF-6D. Likelihood of cost-effectiveness was calculated using Net Monetary Benefit method. Based on conservative assumptions of no remaining effect after 1 year follow-up, the diet intervention was cost-effective. Costs per gained QALY were 8 643 - 9 758 USD. The likelihood for cost-effectiveness, considering a willingness to pay 50 000 USD for a QALY, was 87-93%. The diet intervention is cost-effective.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01343238 Registered April 27, 2011.The regional ethics committee in Gothenburg, Sweden, approved the study on November 15, 2006.
    BMC Public Health 01/2014; 14(1):38. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-38 · 2.32 Impact Factor
Show more