Crash costs by body part injured, fracture involvement, and threat-to-life severity, United States, 2000

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 11710 Beltsville Drive, Suite 300, Calverton, MD 20705-3102, USA.
Accident Analysis & Prevention (Impact Factor: 1.87). 06/2004; 36(3):415-27. DOI: 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00035-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This paper presents costs per US motor vehicle crash victim differentiated into many more diagnostic categories than prior estimates. These unit costs, which include the first keyed to the 1990 edition of Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) threat-to-life severity scores, are reported by body part, whether a fracture/dislocation was involved, and the maximum AIS score among the victim's injuries. This level of detail allows for a more accurate estimation of the social costs of motor vehicle crashes. It also allows for reliable analyses of interventions targeting narrow ranges of injuries. The paper updates the medical care data underlying the US crash costs from 1979 to 1986 to the mid 1990s and improves on prior productivity cost estimates. In addition to presenting the latest generation of crash victim costs, this paper analyzes the effects of applying injury costs classified by AIS code from the 1985 edition to injury incidence data coded with the 1990 edition of AIS. This long-standing practice results in inaccurate cost-benefit analyses that typically overestimate benefits. This problem is more acute when old published costs adjusted for inflation are used rather than the recent costs.


Available from: Ted R Miller, May 18, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Autonomous emergency braking (AEB) systems fitted to cars for pedestrians have been predicted to offer substantial benefit. On this basis, consumer rating programs—for example, the European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP)—are developing rating schemes to encourage fitment of these systems. One of the questions that needs to be answered to do this fully is how the assessment of the speed reduction offered by the AEB is integrated with the current assessment of the passive safety for mitigation of pedestrian injury. Ideally, this should be done on a benefit-related basis.
    Traffic Injury Prevention 06/2015; 16 Suppl 1(sup1):S2-S11. DOI:10.1080/15389588.2014.1003154 · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: There is no standard and clear guideline on how to determine the amount of injury claimed by road crash victims leading to very big variation in injury cost paid by insurance companies. The amount varies from case to case even though it is involved same body part. Objective: The objective of the study is to profile the cost third party bodily injury claim according to the science of injury scaling assessment. Results: Male encountered the highest study population for both first and third party category with 71.7% and 73.4% respectively. The injured victims mainly motorcyclist (82.3%) where lower limb is the most injured region (57%) with the highest injury cost (RM1,197,329). AIS 1 was the most injury severity level suffered by the victims followed by AIS 2. The median cost of AIS 2 for spine injury was the highest with RM28,750 (interquartile range RM18,125 – RM39,375) compared to other body region. In term of thorax region, median cost of AIS 2 for thorax region was RM8500 (interquartile range RM8250 – RM8750) which was found higher than median cost of AIS 3 (RM2700 (IQR RM2675 – RM6025)) in the same body region. There was variation of injury cost within the same injury severity. Extreme values of injury cost ware identified at the same injury severity as reflected by ISS 0, ISS 1, ISS 5, ISS 9 and ISS 10. Conclusion: By assessing the injury claim using AIS, found that the cost was varies within the same injury level where some data could have extreme value. This finding could help insurance company to investigate and identified their over or underestimation of their compensation claim.
    Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 11/2014; 8(24):334-339.
  • Source
    XVI Convegno Nazionale SIIV - Manutenzione e adeguamento delle strade esistenti, ARCAVACATA DI RENDE (CS); 01/2006