Article

Early orthodontic treatment of skeletal open-bite malocclusion: a systematic review.

Department of Orthodontics, The University of Rome, "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
The Angle Orthodontist (Impact Factor: 1.28). 10/2005; 75(5):707-13. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[707:EOTOSO]2.0.CO;2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was a systematic review of the literature to assess the scientific evidence on the actual outcome of early treatments of open-bite malocclusions. A literature survey was done by applying the Medline database (Entrez PubMed). The survey covered the period from January 1966 to July 2004 and used the MeSH, Medical Subject Headings. The following study types that reported data on the treatment effects included: randomized clinical trials (RCT), prospective and retrospective studies with concurrent untreated as well as normal controls, and clinical trials comparing at least two treatment strategies without any untreated or normal control group involved. The search strategy resulted in 1049 articles. After selection according to the inclusionary/exclusionary criteria, seven articles qualified for the final review analysis. No RCTs of early treatment of anterior open bite have been performed. Two controlled clinical trials of early anterior open bite have been performed, and these two studies indicated the effectiveness of treatment in the mixed dentition with headgears or functional appliances (or both). Most of the studies had serious problems of lack of power because of small sample size, bias and confounding variables, lack of method error analysis, blinding in measurements, and deficient or lack of statistical methods. Thus, the quality level of the studies was not sufficient enough to draw any evidence-based conclusions.

1 Follower
 · 
492 Views
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: RESUMEN Las maloclusiones con un patrón facial vertical hiperdivergente son a menudo difíciles de resolver sin un tratamiento ortodóntico-quirúrgico combinados . El objetivo de este artículo es describir un acercamiento no quirúrgico al tratamiento de una moloclusión de clase II de ángulo alto en un paciente en dentición permanente. Ciertos aspectos fundamentales, tales como un diagnóstico correcto, escoger el momento oportuno de tratamiento, un crecimiento mandibular favorable y la colaboración del paciente, resultan críticos a la hora de corregir la severa discrepancia dento-esqueletal. PALABRAS CLAVE: Clase II, modelo de crecimiento vertical, mordida abierta, tratamiento no quirúrgico, Twin Block.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies were identified by searching the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register and Medline. Randomised clinical trials (RCT), prospective and retrospective studies that had concurrent untreated as well as normal controls, and clinical trials that compared at least two treatment strategies but did not have any untreated or normal control group were included. The following were excluded: case series; descriptive studies; case reports; studies concerning treatment in the permanent dentition/ adult patients, surgically assisted treatment, treatment combined with extractions, treatment with full-fixed appliances; and discussion or debate articles. Year of publication, study design, materials, dropouts, measurements, treatment time, success rate, decrease of open bite and divergence, side effects, costs, and authors' conclusions were recorded. Two independent reviewers assessed the articles independently and a quality evaluation and qualitative summary were performed. A total of 1049 articles were identified of which seven were included in the review. No RCT of early treatment of anterior open bite have been performed. Two controlled clinical trials of early anterior open bite were identified, and these both indicated the effectiveness of treatment in the mixed dentition with headgear or functional appliances (or both). Most of the studies had serious problems with lack of power because of small sample size, bias and confounding variables; lack of method-error analysis or blinding in measurements; and deficient or lack of statistical methods. The quality of the studies was insufficient to allow any evidence-based conclusions to be drawn. RCT of sufficient sample size are still needed to determine which treatment is the most effective for early correction of skeletal open bite. Future studies should also include the assessment of long-term stability as well as an analysis of the cost and side-effects of the interventions.
    Evidence-Based Dentistry 02/2006; 7(4):103. DOI:10.1038/sj.ebd.6400450
Show more