Article

Disparities in mental health treatment following the World Trade Center Disaster: Implications for mental health care and health services research

Division of Health and Science Policy, The New York Academy of Medicine, New York, New York 10029-5293, USA.
Journal of Traumatic Stress (Impact Factor: 2.72). 08/2005; 18(4):287-97. DOI: 10.1002/jts.20039
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To assess disparities in mental health treatment in New York City (NYC) after the World Trade Center Disaster (WTCD) reported previously related to care access, we conducted analyses among a cross-sectional survey of adults who had posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or major depression (N = 473) one year after the event. The dependent variables examined were use of mental health services, in general, and use of mental health services related to the WTCD. Similar dependent variables were developed for medication usage. Although a number of bivariate results were statistically significant for postdisaster mental health visits, in a multivariate logistic regression model, only WTCD exposure remained significant. For service utilization related to the WTCD, the multivariate results indicated that African Americans were less likely to have had these visits compared to Whites, while those with a regular doctor, who had greater exposure to WTCD events, and those who had a perievent panic attack were more likely to have had such visits. In terms of medication use, multivariate results suggested that African Americans were less likely to use postdisaster medications, whereas persons 45 + years old and those with a regular doctor, were more likely to use them. For WTCD-related medication use, multivariate models indicated that African Americans were less likely to use medications, relative to Whites, while those between 45 and 64 years old, those with a regular doctor, those exposed to more WTCD events, and those who had a perievent panic attack, were more likely to have taken medications related to the disaster. The primary reason respondents gave for not seeking treatment (55% of subsample) was that they did not believe that they had a problem (73%). Other reasons were that they wanted to solve the problem on their own (5%), had problems accessing services (6%), had financial problems (4%), or had a fear of treatment (4%). Despite the availability of free mental health services offered in a supportive and potentially less stigmatizing environment post disaster, there still appeared to be barriers to receiving postdisaster services among those presumably in need of care.

Full-text

Available from: Richard E Adams, Apr 29, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
81 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is little current information about the unmet mental health care need (UMHCN) and reasons for it among those exposed to the World Trade Center (WTC) terrorist attacks. The purpose of this study was to assess the level of UMHCN among symptomatic individuals enrolled in the WTC Health Registry (WTCHR) in 2011-2012, and to analyze the relationship between UMHCN due to attitudinal, cost, and access factors and mental health symptom severity, mental health care utilization, health insurance availability, and social support.
    BMC Public Health 05/2014; 14(1):491. DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-14-491 · 2.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research findings indicate that many urban trauma-exposed individuals do not access needed mental health care; therefore, it is critical to identify factors associated with the use of mental health services for this group. This study used a mixed-methods approach to examine predictors of mental health service use and barriers to care. Quantitative findings showed that significantly more adults who were male and black with a lower education and income did not report current mental health service use. After controlling for covariates, individuals with lower trauma exposure (odds ratio [OR], 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-0.9) and higher depression symptom scores (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1) were significantly more likely to report current mental health service use. Qualitative findings indicated that fear, low mental health literacy, helplessness, and psychosocial issues were identified as barriers to mental health treatment. Implications for treatment and future research are discussed.
    The Journal of nervous and mental disease 03/2014; 202(3):239-46. DOI:10.1097/NMD.0000000000000108 · 1.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper will examine discrepancies in reported race identification by multiple respondents within the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-being (NSCAW). This topic is of critical importance because race is commonly included as a predictor variable in published NSCAW analyses. For example, some studies have shown that child's race predicts aspects of mental health service use (McCrae, Chapman & Price, 2006) while others have not (Barth et al, 2007; James et al, 2006). The degree to which these findings are valid and reliable is largely dependent upon the reliability of race reports. NSCAW is the first nationally representative longitudinal study of children and families involved in the child welfare system and the first to collect data directly from children and caregivers. The study has produced four waves of data collected from over 6,200 children and their caregivers, caseworkers, and teachers. Begun in October 1999, the sample was drawn from children who were reported to the child welfare system as being maltreated. The NSCAW study design is noteworthy in that many items, including race, were administered to three different respondents: children, their caregivers, and caseworkers. This paper will examine the degree to which these three NSCAW respondents disagreed on the sampled child's race. It will also describe the racial categories that exhibit the greatest levels of disagreement. Preliminary analyses of NSCAW data showed considerable disagreement in race identification, especially between caseworkers and caregivers and between caseworkers and children. A particularly high level of disagreement was found among children identified as Native American. Although the results cannot address accuracy of race reporting, key disagreements that have policy implications will be discussed. Finally, the paper will examine explanatory factors that may be contributing to disagreement.