Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Strategies to Combat HIV/AIDS in Developing Countries

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
BMJ (online) (Impact Factor: 17.45). 01/2006; 331(7530):1431-7. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38643.368692.68
Source: PubMed


To assess the costs and health effects of a range of interventions for preventing the spread of HIV and for treating people with HIV/AIDS in the context of the millennium development goal for combating HIV/AIDS.
Cost effectiveness analysis based on an epidemiological model.
Analyses undertaken for two regions classified using the WHO epidemiological grouping-Afr-E, countries in sub-Saharan Africa with very high adult and high child mortality, and Sear-D, countries in South East Asia with high adult and high child mortality.
Biological and behavioural parameters from clinical and observational studies and population based surveys. Intervention effects and resource inputs based on published reports, expert opinion, and the WHO-CHOICE database.
Costs per disability adjusted life year (DALY) averted in 2000 international dollars (Int dollars).
In both regions interventions focused on mass media, education and treatment of sexually transmitted infections for female sex workers, and treatment of sexually transmitted infections in the general population cost < Int150 dollars per DALY averted. Voluntary counselling and testing costs < Int350 dollars per DALY averted in both regions, while prevention of mother to child transmission costs < Int50 dollars per DALY averted in Afr-E but around Int850 dollars per DALY in Sear-D. School based education strategies and various antiretroviral treatment strategies cost between Int500 dollars and Int5000 dollars per DALY averted.
Reducing HIV transmission could be done most efficiently through mass media campaigns, interventions for sex workers and treatment of sexually transmitted infections where resources are most scarce. However, prevention of mother to child transmission, voluntary counselling and testing, and school based education would yield further health gains at higher budget levels and would be regarded as cost effective or highly cost effective based on standard international benchmarks. Antiretroviral therapy is at least as cost effective in improving population health as some of these interventions.

Download full-text


Available from: Adrian Salomon,
  • Source
    • "We used HIV infections averted as the measure of effectiveness and measured the costs and effectiveness during a one-year period. To obtain the effectiveness of MMT, we used avert models available in the booklet entitled as "Evaluating Programs for HIV/AIDS Prevention and Care in Developing Countries" published by International Family Health (25). The numbers of HIV infections averted were calculated using a mathematical model designed by Weinstein and colleagues (26). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The increase in high-risk injections and unsafe sexual behaviors has led to increased HIV infection prevalence among Intravenous Drug Users (IDUs). The high costs of HIV/AIDS care and low financial resources necessitate an economic evaluation to make the best decision for the control of HIV/AIDS. This study was conducted to determine the cost-effectiveness of Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) centers in HIV infection prevention among drug users. In this interventional study, we included all the seven MMT centers and the drug users registered there (n = 694). We calculated all the costs imposed on the government, i.e. Provider of case. Mathematical models were used to estimate the number of HIV cases averted from high-risk behaviors. Sensitivity analyses were performed to show the effects of uncertainty in parameters on the number of HIV cases averted and also Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). Based on the averted models, the selected MMT centers could prevent 128 HIV cases during 1 year. The total cost was $ 547423 and that of HIV/AIDS care in the no intervention scenario was estimated $ 14171816. ICER was $ 106382 per HIV case averted. The results of the sensitivity analysis indicated that MMT intervention was cost-effective even in the worst scenario and ICER varied from $ 39149 to $ 290004 per HIV case averted. With regard to the high prevalence of drug injection among drug users and considering the high effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MMT centers in preventing HIV infection, establishment of MMT centers in regional and national levels seems reasonable.
    01/2014; 16(1):e7801. DOI:10.5812/ircmj.7801
  • Source
    • "A range of studies are available to guide Thai policy makers to prioritise HIV/AIDS interventions. International estimates are available on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of HIV/AIDS interventions [5-7], and a recent document has systematically reviewed this information - in combination with national estimates - to provide informed priorities for HIV/AIDS control [4]. Yet the analysis falls short of including other criteria that may also play important roles in effective decision-making, such as ethical and social concerns. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A wide range of preventive, treatment, and care programs for HIV/AIDS are currently available and some of them have been implemented in Thailand. Policy makers are now facing challenges on how the scarce resources for HIV/AIDS control can be spent more wisely. Although effectiveness and cost-effectiveness information is useful for guiding policy decisions, empirical evidence indicates the importance of other criteria, such as equity and the characteristics of the target population, also play important roles in priority setting. This study aims to experiment with the use of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) to prioritise interventions in HIV/AIDS control in Thailand. We used MCDA to rank 40 HIV/AIDS interventions on the basis of the priority setting criteria put forward by three groups of stakeholders including policy makers, people living with HIV/AIDs (PLWHA), and village health volunteers (VHVs). MCDA incorporated an explicit component of deliberation to let stakeholders reflect on the rank ordering, and adapt where necessary. Upon deliberation, policy makers expressed a preference for programs that target high risk groups such as men who have sex with men, injecting drug users, and female sex workers. The VHVs preferred interventions that target the youth or the general population, and gave lower priority to programs that target high risk groups. PLWHA gave all interventions the same priority. The rank order correlation between the priorities as expressed before and after deliberation was 37% among the policy makers and 46% among the VHVs. This study documented the feasibility of MCDA to prioritize HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand, and has shown the usefulness of a deliberative process as an integrated component of MCDA. MCDA holds potential to contribute to a more transparent and accountable priority setting process, and further application of this approach in the prioritisation of health interventions is warranted.
    Health Research Policy and Systems 02/2012; 10(1):6. DOI:10.1186/1478-4505-10-6 · 1.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Advanced HIV (AIDS) is a phenomenon that its social, cultural and economic aspects are very broad. In June 2000 in the United Nation Security Council (UNSC) Resolution it was recognized as a potential threat to global stability and security for the first time (Hogan et al., 2005). AIDS is now the fourth cause of human mortality and is predicted to be the first by 2020. "

    Scientific research and essays 01/2012; 7(6):693-697. · 0.45 Impact Factor
Show more