Cancer epidemiology in the freely associated U.S. Pacific Island jurisdictions: challenges and methodologic issues.

Department of Public Health Sciences and Epidemiology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i, USA.
Pacific health dialog: a publication of the Pacific Basin Officers Training Program and the Fiji School of Medicine 10/2004; 11(2):84-7.
Source: PubMed


The health care systems of the U.S.-associated Pacific Island jurisdictions, especially the three freely associated states (Federated States of Micronesia, Republic of the Marshall Islands, and Republic of Belau), are faced with problems similar to developing countries such as malnutrition and infectious diseases, as well as diseases relating to westernization such as diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. Although cancer has emerged as an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the Pacific, little population-based data are currently available. This paper addresses some of the practical and methodological challenges to obtaining accurate and reliable cancer data in these jurisdictions. This paper discusses the use of annualized period prevalence to allow for some measurement of cancer burden when cancer incidence cannot be accurately calculated. This method, however, has its own limitations as cancer prevalence relates to both incidence and duration of illness, and numerous factors impact survival potential (i.e., preexisting diseases, lifestyle practices, and access to treatment). In addition, under-ascertainment and data quality issues will impact any cancer morbidity or mortality measurements. Thus, improvement in the health care systems, including the creation and ongoing support of active cancer registries would be the optimal approach to better delineating cancer occurrence and risk for the populations of these Pacific Island jurisdictions.

Download full-text


Available from: Seiji Yamada, Oct 07, 2015
1 Follower
20 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess cancer prevention and control capacity in the US-associated Pacific Islands (USAPI, including American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands, Micronesia, Guam, Marshall Islands, and Palau) and to support indigenous leadership in reducing cancer health disparities. Jurisdiction- specific needs assessments were conducted to assess cancer prevention and control capacity and challenges. The Cancer Council of the Pacific Islands (CCPI), an indigenous health leadership team from public health and medicine, was supported to review assessment findings, develop priorities, and build capacity to address recommendations. Capacity varied across jurisdictions, but generally there is limited ability to measure cancer burden and a lack of programs, equipment, and trained personnel to detect and treat cancer. Most cancers are diagnosed in late stages when survival is compromised and care is most costly. Jurisdictions also are challenged by geographic, social, and political constraints and multiple in-country demands for funding. Based on findings, strategies were developed by the CCPI to guide efforts, including fund seeking, to expand cancer prevention and control capacity in regionally appropriate ways. Concerted planning, training, and funding efforts are needed to overcome challenges and upgrade capacity in cancer education, prevention, detection, and treatment in the USAPI. Indigenous leadership and local capacity building are essential to this process.
    Journal of public health management and practice: JPHMP 01/2007; 13(1):49-58. DOI:10.1097/00124784-200701000-00009 · 1.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article describes funding and other challenges to cancer control in the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) and examines funding opportunity announcements (FOAs) as a critical facet in implementation of the U.S. Compact of Free Association (COFA). As a health-relevant policy, COFA commits the United States to improve the health of FSM citizens and, specifically, allows the FSM to apply for U.S. federal health FOAs. Emerging research suggests discrepancies in the intent and implementation of COFA and indicates that the capacity of the FSM to secure U.S. health funding may be at least partially hindered by the ways in which FOAs are structured. Current cancer-related FOAs were identified to evaluate their relevance to the FSM. Eligibility requirements of all FOAs were systematically reviewed and compared with FSM infrastructural and human resources. Findings indicate that most FOAs have requirements more likely to be met in fully developed health service entities. Such requirements disadvantage the FSM when competed with the relatively more resource-rich U.S. states and health services systems. This situation predisposes the FSM to increased risk of disparate cancer outcomes. Highlighted is the need for distributive justice and specific efforts that enhance the health services infrastructure in the FSM and increase opportunities for resource-appropriate interventions. Findings provide considerations for those in international social welfare, public health, and other disciplines interested in the advancement of global health partnerships to eliminate cancer disparities in underresourced nations.
    Social Work in Public Health 05/2010; 25(3):296-310. DOI:10.1080/19371910903240720 · 0.31 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the endometrial cancer rates, and the proportion attributable to diabetes mellitus (DM), physical inactivity, and overweight/obesity, by ethnicity with a focus on Pacific women in New Zealand. Linked census-cancer records (1981-2004) were used to determine incidence rates of endometrial cancer by ethnicity. Health survey data (2006-2007) were used to determine risk factor prevalence by ethnicity. Relative risks for the association between diabetes, obesity, physical inactivity and endometrial cancer were sourced from published studies. Population attributable risk (PAR) methods, with Monte Carlo simulation, were used to estimate the PAR% by ethnicity and applied to 2001-2004 cancer rates. Pacific women had 2.61 (95 % confidence interval 2.22-3.05) times the endometrial cancer rate of European/Other women pooled over time, and the most rapidly increasing rates over time with the rate ratio increasing from 1.96 (1.14-3.37) in 1981/1986 to 3.78 (3.03-4.71) in 2001/2004 (p for trend = 0.14). Pacific women had the highest PAR% for DM, physical inactivity, and overweight/obesity (63.1 %), followed by Māori (58.6 %) and European/Other (48.6 %). Applying these PAR% to 2001-2004 endometrial cancer rates, the rate ratio comparing Pacific to European/Other endometrial cancer reduced from 3.8 for total cancer (attributable plus non-attributable) to 2.3 for non-attributable cancer, and the rate difference reduced by 79 % from 51 to 11 per 100,000. Pacific women have high endometrial cancer rates in New Zealand. Some, but not all, of the ethnic inequalities were explained by measured differences in obesity/overweight, DM, and physical inactivity.
    Cancer Causes and Control 04/2012; 23(6):875-85. DOI:10.1007/s10552-012-9956-3 · 2.74 Impact Factor
Show more