The Terri Schiavo case: legal, ethical, and medical perspectives.

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Annals of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 16.1). 12/2005; 143(10):744-8.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although tragic, the plight of Terri Schiavo provides a valuable case study. The conflicts and misunderstandings surrounding her situation offer important lessons in medicine, law, and ethics. Despite media saturation and intense public interest, widespread confusion lingers regarding the diagnosis of persistent vegetative state, the judicial processes involved, and the appropriateness of the ethical framework used by those entrusted with Terri Schiavo's care. First, the authors review the current medical understanding of persistent vegetative state, including the requirements for patient examination, the differential diagnosis, and the practice guidelines of the American Academy of Neurology regarding artificial nutrition and hydration for patients with this diagnosis. Second, they examine the legal history, including the 2000 trial, the 2002 evidentiary hearing, and the subsequent appeals. The authors argue that the law did not fail Terri Schiavo, but produced the highest-quality evidence and provided the most judicial review of any end-of-life guardianship case in U.S. history. Third, they review alternative ethical frameworks for understanding the Terri Schiavo case and contend that the principle of respect for autonomy is paramount in this case and in similar cases. Far from being unusual, the manner in which Terri Schiavo's case was reviewed and the basis for the decision reflect a broad medical, legal, and ethical consensus. Greater clarity regarding the persistent vegetative state, less apprehension of the presumed mysteries of legal proceedings, and greater appreciation of the ethical principles at work are the chief benefits obtained from studying this provocative case.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Terri Schiavo, 41, died March 31,2005 at the Pinellas Park hospice where she lay for years while her hus-band and her parents fought in the nation's most divisive-and most heavily litigated-right-to-die dispute .Although tragic, the plight of Terri Schiavo provides a valuable case study. The conflicts sur-rounding her situation offer important lessons in medicine, law and ethics'! The following is a sum-mary ofMs Sciavo's case and my personal thoughts about it: On February 25, 1990, 26-year-old Terri Schiavo suf-fered a sudden cardiac arrest, the cause of which was not determined. She thereafter lapsed into a persistent vegetative state (PVS). She remained in a vegetative state for fifteen years. She died of dehy-dration on March 312005, nearly two weeks after her feeding tube was removed in accordance with a court order. Her husband, Michael Schiavo, had long sought to have the feeding tube taken out, arguing that she would not have wanted to be maintained in a vege-tative state, but her parents fought to keep her alive. Members of the United States Congress, the Florida Legislature and Florida Governor Jeb Bush intervened to keep Ms Schiavo's feeding tube in place.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article reports the findings from analysis of end-of-life court cases and case files from one state public guardianship administrator as well as interviews with guardians or surrogates to identify how language and principles of the courts are operationalized in end-of-life decisions for those who are unable to make decisions for themselves. We found that physicians and guardians worked well within the requirements of the genre to ensure the best interests for those whom they represent.
    Technical Communication Quarterly 07/2013; 22(3). DOI:10.1080/10572252.2013.760061
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Catholic moral tradition has consistently offered the distinction between ordinary and extraordinary means as a framework for making end-of-life decisions. Recent papal allocutions, however, have raised the question of whether providing artificial nutrition to patients in a persistent vegetative state is to be considered ordinary and thus morally obligatory in all cases. I argue that this "revisionist" position is contrary to Catholic teaching and that enforcing such a position would endanger the ability of Catholic health care institutions to minister to all their constituents.
    Christian Bioethics 10/2011; 17(2):153-164. DOI:10.1093/cb/cbr013

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 3, 2014