Article

Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment.

Health and Disability Research Institute, Boston University, 53 Bay State Road, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.9). 12/2005; 37(6):339-45. DOI: 10.1080/16501970500302793
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In this article, we review the limitations of traditional rehabilitation functional outcome instruments currently in use within the rehabilitation field to assess Activity and Participation domains as defined by the International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health. These include a narrow scope of functional outcomes, data incompatibility across instruments, and the precision vs feasibility dilemma. Following this, we illustrate how contemporary measurement techniques, such as item response theory methods combined with computer adaptive testing methodology, can be applied in rehabilitation to design functional outcome instruments that are comprehensive in scope, accurate, allow for compatibility across instruments, and are sensitive to clinically important change without sacrificing their feasibility. Finally, we present some of the pressing challenges that need to be overcome to provide effective dissemination and training assistance to ensure that current and future generations of rehabilitation professionals are familiar with and skilled in the application of contemporary outcomes measurement.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
93 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Relative precision is to denote the ratio of the error variance of two sample designs. The aim of the present study was to compare measurement precisions of the Oswestry Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and a computer adaptive testing (CAT) method for measuring disability resulting from back pain. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A cross-sectional study was carried out with two independent convenient samples from two out-patient rehabilitation clinics for back pain (N = 42) and non-back pain groups (N = 42). Participants were asked to fill out the ODQ and CAT of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health - Activity Measure (ICF-AM). A series of Rasch analyses were performed to calculate person ability measures. RESULTS: The CAT measures had greater precision in discriminating the groups than did the ODQ measure in comparisons of the relative precision. CONCLUSIONS: The CAT measure appears to be more effective than the ODQ measure in terms of measurement precision. By administering test items calibrated in a way, CAT measures using item response theory may promise a means with measurement precision as well as efficiency.
    Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 07/2014; 28(1). DOI:10.3233/BMR-140502 · 1.04 Impact Factor
  • American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation / Association of Academic Physiatrists 08/2014; 93(10). DOI:10.1097/PHM.0000000000000167 · 1.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: The purpose of this survey was to gain greater insight into hand therapists' use of Patient Report Outcome (PRO) measures. Methods: An 11-question survey that evaluated therapists' perceptions, preferences, and patterns of use of patient report outcome measures was sent to members of ASHT. Results: A total of 633 ASHT members participated in the survey study. A large majority of participants (92%) responded affirmatively to using a PRO measure in practice. The DASH was reported as the most frequently used measure (90%). The majority of therapists (84%) discuss the results of the outcome measurement score with their patients. Of the participants who use more than one outcome measure, 44% report that this allows them to better establish their patient's functional and physical limitations. Conclusion: The findings in this study suggest that a large percentage of hand therapists are currently including a PRO measure in their hand therapy practice.
    Journal of Hand Therapy 10/2014; 27(4). DOI:10.1016/j.jht.2014.07.001 · 1.81 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
1 Download
Available from