Calibration of accelerometer output for children.

Department of Exercise Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Medicine &amp Science in Sports &amp Exercise (Impact Factor: 4.46). 12/2005; 37(11 Suppl):S523-30. DOI: 10.1249/
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Understanding the determinants of physical activity behavior in children and youths is essential to the design and implementation of intervention studies to increase physical activity. Objective methods to assess physical activity behavior using various types of motion detectors have been recommended as an alternative to self-report for this population because they are not subject to many of the sources of error associated with children's recall required for self-report measures. This paper reviews the calibration of four different accelerometers used most frequently to assess physical activity and sedentary behavior in children. These accelerometers are the ActiGraph, Actical, Actiwatch, and the RT3 Triaxial Research Tracker. Studies are reviewed that describe the regression modeling approaches used to calibrate these devices using directly measured energy expenditure as the criterion. Point estimates of energy expenditure or count ranges corresponding to different activity intensities from several studies are presented. For a given accelerometer, the count cut points defining the boundaries for 3 and 6 METs vary substantially among the studies reviewed even though most studies include walking, running and free-living activities in the testing protocol. Alternative data processing using the raw acceleration signal is recommended as a possible alternative approach where the actual acceleration pattern is used to characterize activity behavior. Important considerations for defining best practices for accelerometer calibration in children and youths are presented.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We evaluated whether regional differences in physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) existed along language boundaries within Switzerland and whether potential differences would be explained by socio-demographics or environmental characteristics. We combined data of 611 children aged 4 to 7 years from four regional studies. PA and SB were assessed by accelerometers. Information about the socio-demographic background was obtained by questionnaires. Objective neighbourhood attributes could be linked to home addresses. Multivariate regression models were used to test associations between PA and SB and socio-demographic characteristics and neighbourhood attributes. Children from the German compared to the French-speaking region were more physically active and less sedentary (by 10-15 %, p < 0.01). Although German-speaking children lived in a more favourable environment and a higher socioeconomic neighbourhood (differences p < 0.001), these characteristics did not explain the differences in PA behaviour between French and German speaking. Factors related to the language region, which might be culturally rooted were among the strongest correlates of PA and SB among Swiss children, independent of individual, social and environmental factors.
    International Journal of Public Health 01/2015; 60(3). DOI:10.1007/s00038-014-0645-8 · 1.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to examine the associations of objectively measured physical activity (PA) with several markers of fatness and fitness in a relatively large sample of adolescents with Down syndrome (DS). This study comprised a total of 100 adolescents with DS (37 females) aged 11–20 years-old, and a sex-matched sample of 100 adolescents without disabilities, participating in the UP&DOWN study. The ALPHA health-related fitness test battery for adolescents was used to assess fatness and fitness. PA was measured by accelerometry. Adolescents with DS had higher fatness and significantly lower fitness levels in all variables measured than adolescents without DS (all p < 0.05). Moderate-to-large effects were observed in fatness variables (d = 0.65–1.42), but particularly large values were found in fitness variables (d = 2.05–2.43). In addition, PA levels was not associated with fatness variables, whereas total PA and vigorous PA were associated with all fitness variables (p < 0.05), and moderate-vigorous PA (MVPA) was associated with muscular fitness (p < 0.05), after adjusting for potential confounders. Further analysis revealed that there were differences in fitness by tertiles of vigorous PA between the lowest and the highest groups in all fitness variables (all p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found in fitness by tertiles of MVPA according with PA guidelines (≥60 min in MVPA). Our findings indicate that PA levels are not associated with fatness variables, whereas high PA levels, in particular vigorous PA, are positively associated with high fitness in adolescents with DS.
    Research in Developmental Disabilities 11/2014; 36. DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.022 · 3.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Health-related physical activity recommendations are now widely known. To achieve benefits for their health, youth have to accumulate at least 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous intensity activity per day. The accuracy of field measure of physical activity is a complex question and no Gold standard exist. This study compares the data of two accelerometers (Actigraph, GT3X®; Bodymedia, SP3 Armband®), two diaries (assessing respectively self-reported activity and self-reported intensity) and a recall questionnaire. Furthermore, a focus on participants’ comfort during data collection was carried out to help to decrease the high dropout rates in these studies. Eighteen young people with a mean age of 11.9 years (SD = 1.97) practicing 3.54 (SD = 2.19) hours of sport per week have worn the two accelerometers, filled self-reported measures in during 7 days. Results showed moderate to high correlations between accelerometer data with nevertheless some difference in time spent to light, moderate or vigorous physical activity (PA). Given (1) that self-reported data were systematically closer to those of the GT3X than those of the SP3 and (2) that GT3X was more appreciated by the participants in terms of wearing comfort and aesthetic, we recommend the use of the GT3X. On the whole data extracted from the self-reported intensity, diary were more correlated with accelerometer data than those of the self-reported activities diary. Such easy to use tool should be preferred to assess PA of physically active young people. Finally, the recall questionnaire does not have proved to be a valid tool.
    Science & Sports 04/2014; 29(2):78-87. DOI:10.1016/j.scispo.2013.01.010 · 0.54 Impact Factor