Hierarchical integration of individual motions in locally paired-dot stimuli

Department of Computer Science and Systems Engineering, Muroran Institute of Technology, 27-1 Mizumoto-cho, Muroran, Hokkaido 050-8585, Japan.
Vision Research (Impact Factor: 1.82). 02/2006; 46(1-2):82-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.10.003
Source: PubMed


Recent psychophysical studies suggest that there are two types of motion integration processes in human visual system, i.e., the local and the global integration process. The existence of the local integration process is suggested by the vector-average perception in locally paired-dot (LPD) stimuli. Here, we investigated the relationship between the two motion integration processes by measuring the signal detection thresholds in three corresponding stimuli: (1) standard random-dot kinematograms (RDKs), (2) LPD stimuli the individual dot motions of which were identical to those of RDKs, and (3) pairwise-averaged stimuli the individual dot motions of which corresponded to the vector-averages of locally paired motions in LPD stimuli. We found that the thresholds in LPD stimuli were similar to those in pairwise-averaged stimuli rather than in RDKs. In addition, when dots were paired appropriately, observers could detect coherent motions in LPD stimuli even if the proportions of signal dots were less than the detection thresholds in corresponding RDKs. These results suggest that the local and global integrations of individual motions are carried out hierarchically, and that the global motion perception in LPD stimuli does not depend on individual dot motions directly, but depends on locally integrated motions.

Download full-text


Available from: Osamu Watanabe,
  • Source
    • "Furthermore, the concept of " local " or " global " information extraction grew as a topic of discussion. Researchers had previously demonstrated that observers of dot motion stimuli are able to extract the mean shared direction of motions from " local " and " global " dot arrays independently (Watanabe and Kikuchi 2006). In this context, " local " defines motion signals that are tightly grouped within a subarea of an array, whereas " global " defines the integration of motion signals spread widely across the array. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We identified the information used to anticipate throw direction in handball. In two experiments, we examined how anticipation performance is affected when the information from one of five body areas (right arm, shoulders, hips, trunk, or total throw side) was either neutralized or decoupled from the motion of other body segments. In the first experiment, performance was significantly reduced when information from the throwing arm was neutralized, irrespective of skill levels. Skilled participants were negatively affected when the shoulders, hips, and trunk were neutralized, whereas less-skilled participants showed trends toward improvement under identical conditions. In the second experiment, partially disrupting relative motion via decoupling was not enough to reduce the anticipation performance among skilled participants to chance levels, whereas less-skilled participants lost their ability to anticipate in three conditions. Our findings suggest that skilled and less-skilled participants employ different information extraction strategies, yet information from the throwing arm is critical to anticipation for both groups. The two experiments suggest that relative motion mediated by both the absolute displacement trajectories of individual marker locations and their relative timings are important in informing anticipation, irrespective of skill level.
    Attention Perception & Psychophysics 06/2013; 75(7). DOI:10.3758/s13414-013-0485-2 · 2.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "It is generally agreed that elementary motion signals are processed by a large array of bilocal Reichardt detectors (Adelson & Bergen, 1985; Reichardt, 1961; Van Santen & Sperling, 1984, 1985; Watson & Ahumada, 1985), devices which perceive the correlation between time-varying luminance modulations at two disparate retinal locations, resulting in several seemingly counterintuitive phenomena: motion can be seen in stimuli containing no spatially displaced elements (Allik & Pulver, 1994, 1995; Johansson, 1950) and contrast reversal in one of the input luminance functions results in reversal of the direction of perceived motion (Anstis, 1970). In a sufficiently small area, local motion signals are pooled together into a composite perception which corresponds to a vector sum of individual components (Allik, 1992a; Allik & Pulver, 1995; Watanabe & Kikuchi, 2006). There is also evidence that elementary motion signals can be recruited along the trajectory of a moving object (Krekelberg & Lappe, 1999; Verghese, Watamaniuk, McKee, & Grzywacz, 1999; Watamaniuk, McKee, & Grzywacz, 1995) but there are obvious limitations to this recruitment since motion in random dot kinematograms is perceived almost identically when some of the elements travel along extended trajectories as when trajectories are interrupted and transferred to a new set of elements in the next frame (Allik & Dzhafarov, 1984; Scase, Braddick, & Raymond, 1996). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Six observers were asked to indicate in which of two opposite directions, to the right or to the left, an entire display appeared to move, based on the proportion of right vs leftward motion elements, each of which was distinctly visible. The performance of each observer was described by Thurstone's discriminative processes and Bernoulli trial models which described empirical psychometric functions equally well. Although formally it was impossible to discriminate between these two models, treating observer as a counting device which measures a randomly selected subsample of all available motion elements had certain advantages. According to the Bernoulli trial model decisions about the global motion direction in a range of 12-800 elements were based on taking into account about 4±2 random moving dot elements. This small number is not due to cancellation of the opposite motion vectors since the motion direction recognition performance did not improve after the compared motion directions were made orthogonal. This may indicate that the motion pooling mechanism studied in our experiment is strongly limited in capacity.
    Vision research 07/2011; 51(17):1949-57. DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.004 · 1.82 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In other words, this stereogram has potential matches leading to transparent surface perception as well as a unitary (or non-transparent) surface perception. This stereogram can be regarded as a random-dot version of the double-nail illusion (Krol & van de Grind, 1980; Nakamizo & Kondo, 1988) and a stereo version of the locally paired-dot (LPD) stimulus (Braddick, 1997; Curran & Braddick, 2000; Qian, Andersen, & Adelson, 1994; Watanabe & Kikuchi, 2006) that was used to investigate the perceptual property of motion transparency . However, the alternative percept of transparency, though mathematically equally valid, is never perceived from this stereogram. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In binocular vision, observers can perceive transparent surfaces by fusing a stereogram composed of two overlapping patterns with different disparities. When dot patterns of two surfaces are identical, the stereogram has potential matches leading to both transparency and non-transparency (or unitary surface) perceptions. However, these two matching candidates are exclusive if the uniqueness assumption holds. This stereogram can be regarded as a random-dot version of the double-nail illusion and a stereo version of the locally paired-dot stimulus that was used to investigate the neural mechanism for motion transparency. Which surface is perceived in this ambiguous stereogram would reflect the property of the transparency detection mechanism in human stereopsis. Here we perform a parametric study to examine the perceptual property in this ambiguous stereogram. The result showed that the ability in transparency detection from this stereogram is determined by the contrast reversal ratio between overlapping patterns within small regions the width of which was about 0.4 deg. The width was similar to the receptive field sizes of neurons in striate cortex. The result suggests that the contrast reversal between two identical patterns would modulate activities of binocular neurons, and this modification gives a crucial effect on the neural representation for overlapping disparities.
    Journal of Vision 11/2009; 9(12):24.1-9. DOI:10.1167/9.12.24 · 2.39 Impact Factor
Show more