Article

Unilateral frontalis sling for the surgical correction of unilateral poor-function ptosis.

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Impact Factor: 0.91). 12/2005; 21(6):412-6; discussion 416-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.iop.0000180068.17344.80
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the functional and cosmetic results after frontalis sling repair for unilateral ptosis associated with either poor levator function or synkinesis.
Preoperative and postoperative photographs and records of 127 patients who underwent unilateral frontalis sling ptosis repair were retrospectively reviewed. An eyelid crease incision was used in all cases, with suturing of the sling material directly to tarsus.
Preoperative diagnosis for all patients was either unilateral poor-function blepharoptosis or ptosis associated with levator synkinesis. Underlying causes included 75 congenital, 13 posttraumatic, 11 congenital "jaw-winking," 10 cranial nerve III palsies, 9 myasthenia gravis, 5 chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia, and 4 congenital "double-elevator" palsies. There was a mean follow-up of 11.6 months. Twenty-eight eyelids required reoperation: 11 for undercorrection, 6 for overcorrection with keratopathy, 2 for upper eyelid crease revision, 7 for correction of poor contour, 1 for a broken sling, and 1 for removal of an infected exposed polytetraflouroethylene sling. Lagophthalmos of greater than 2 mm was noted in 18 patients, 5 of whom had persistent keratopathy requiring reoperation. No other complications were reported, except for 1 suture granuloma. Good to excellent final postoperative eyelid height was achieved in 121 patients (95%) after all surgeries and with conscious recruitment of the frontalis muscle. A large majority of patients and/or parents expressed satisfaction with the final cosmetic result and were not bothered by any asymmetric lagophthalmos in downgaze or lack of a synchronous blink. However, 19 of 25 amblyopic patients were less satisfied with passive eyelid height as they failed to recruit the ipsilateral frontalis muscle to activate the sling during binocular viewing. In 17 of these 19 patients, good to excellent eyelid height could be achieved with conscious active brow elevation.
Unilateral sling provides good to excellent functional and cosmetic results in unilateral poor-function ptosis. However, patients with amblyopia usually require conscious effort to activate the frontalis muscle to achieve satisfactory eyelid height.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
211 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background:Although Hering's law has significant importance in the planning and outcomes of eyelid surgery, it has not been applied in all cases of ptosis.Objectives:The authors evaluate whether cases of unilateral congenital ptosis require surgery on the contralateral eyelid, in keeping with Hering's law.Methods:The records of 35 consecutive patients with unilateral congenital ptosis who had surgical repair between 2007 and 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent either levator resection or frontalis sling surgery. Preoperative and postoperative clinical documents and photographs were evaluated for each case, including preoperative Hering's dependence and postoperative measurements of the change in position of the nonoperated eyelid.Results:There were 19 women and 16 men, and the average patient age was 9.7 ± 10 years. The mean preoperative levator function and marginal reflex distance were 6.7 ± 4.7 mm and 0.3 ± 0.47 mm, respectively. There were significant differences in age, preoperative levator function, and marginal reflex distance between patients who underwent levator resection and those who had frontalis sling surgery. In all patients, the preoperative Hering's dependence of eyelid position did not show any decrease, and the position of the contralateral eyelid postoperatively did not differ from the baseline position.Conclusions:This research shows that Hering's law does not apply to cases of congenital ptosis. This is likely due to the fibrotic levator palpebrae muscle and its special innervations. Thus, it is not necessary to perform levator resection or a frontalis sling operation on the unaffected eyelid.
    Aesthetic surgery journal / the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic surgery 11/2013; · 2.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 01/2008; 49(1).
  • Source
    Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 01/2010; 51(2).

Preview

Download
5 Downloads