Programmatic pathways to child survival: results of a multi-country evaluation of Integrated Management of Childhood Illness.

Department of Child and Adolescent Health and Development, World Health Organization, Via Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland.
Health Policy and Planning (Impact Factor: 3.06). 01/2006; 20 Suppl 1:i5-i17. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czi055
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To summarize the expectations held by World Health Organization programme personnel about how the introduction of the Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) strategy would lead to improvements in child health and nutrition, to compare these expectations with what was learned from the Multi-Country Evaluation of IMCI Effectiveness, Cost and Impact (MCE-IMCI), and to discuss the implications of these findings for child survival policies and programmes. Design: The MCE-IMCI study designs were based on an impact model developed in 1999-2000 to define how IMCI would be implemented at country level and below, and the outcomes and impact it would have on child health and survival. MCE-IMCI studies included: feasibility assessments documenting IMCI implementation in 12 countries (1999-2001); in-depth studies using compatible designs in Bangladesh, Brazil, Peru, Tanzania and Uganda; and cross-site analyses addressing the effectiveness of specific subsets of IMCI activities.
The IMCI strategy was successfully introduced in the great majority of countries with moderate to high levels of child mortality in the period from 1996 to 2001. Seven years of country-based evaluation, however, indicates that some of the basic expectations underlying the development of IMCI were not met. Four of the five countries (the exception is Tanzania) had difficulties in expanding the strategy at national level while maintaining adequate intervention quality. Technical guidelines on delivering interventions at family and community levels were slow to appear, and in their absence countries stalled in their efforts to increase population coverage with essential interventions related to care-seeking, nutrition, and correct care of the sick child at home. The full weight of health system limitations on IMCI implementation was not appreciated at the outset, and only now is it clear that solutions to larger problems in political commitment, human resources, financing, integrated or at least coordinated programme management, and effective decentralization are essential underpinnings of successful efforts to reduce child mortality.
This analysis highlights the need for a shift if child survival efforts are to be successful. Delivery systems that rely solely on government health facilities must be expanded to include the full range of potential channels in a setting and strong community-based approaches. The focus on process within child health programmes must change to include greater accountability for intervention coverage at population level. Global strategies that expect countries to make massive adaptations must be complemented by country-level implementation guidelines that begin with local epidemiology and rely on tools developed for specific epidemiological profiles.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increasingly attention is shifting towards delivering essential packages of care, often based on clinical practice guidelines, as a means to improve maternal, child and newborn survival in low-income settings. Cost effectiveness analysis (CEA), allied to the evaluation of less complex intervention, has become an increasingly important tool for priority setting. Arguably such analyses should be extended to inform decisions around the deployment of more complex interventions. In the discussion, we illustrate some of the challenges facing the extension of CEA to this area. We suggest that there are both practical and methodological challenges to overcome when conducting economic evaluation for packages of care interventions that incorporate clinical guidelines. Some might be overcome by developing specific guidance on approaches, for example clarity in identifying relevant costs. Some require consensus on methods. The greatest challenge, however, lies in how to incorporate, as measures of effectiveness, process measures of service quality. Questions on which measures to use, how multiple measures might be combined, how improvements in one area might be compared with those in another and what value is associated with improvement in health worker practices are yet to be answered.
    Tropical Medicine & International Health 01/2011; 16(1):97-104. · 2.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: At the current rate of decline in infant mortality, India is unlikely to achieve the Millennium Development Goal on child survival. Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illness (IMNCI), adapted from the global Integrated Management of Childhood Illness to enhance the focus on newborns and on community health workers, is the central strategy within the National Reproductive and Child Health Programme to address high infant mortality. This paper assessed the progress of IMNCI in India, identified the programme bottlenecks, and also assessed the effect on coverage of key newborn and childcare practices. Programme data were analyzed to ascertain the implementation status; rapid programme assessment was conducted for identifying the programme bottlenecks; and results of analysis of two rounds of district-level household surveys were used for comparing the change in the coverage of child-health interventions in IMNCI and control districts. More than 200,000 community health workers and first-level healthcare providers were trained during 2005-2009 at a variable pace across 223 districts. Of the reported births (n = 1,102,573), 65.5% were visited by a trained worker within 24 hours, and 63.1% were visited three times within 10 days. Poor supervision and inadequate essential supplies affected the performance of trained workers. During 2004-2008, 12 early-implementing districts had covered most key newborn and child practice indicators compared to the control districts; however, the difference was significant only for care-seeking for acute respiratory infection (net difference: 17.8%; 95% confidence interval 2.3-33.2, p < 0.026). Based on the early experience of IMNCI implementation in different states of India, measures need to be taken to improve supportive supervision, availability of essential supplies, and monitoring of the programme if the strategy has to translate into improved child survival in India.
    Journal of Health Population and Nutrition 12/2011; 29(6):629-38. · 1.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: He was just another baby in the queue with a cough. Baby Jabu, a 7-month-old infant, had arrived at the clinic with his mother, and he was in a good general state (pink, breastfeeding) despite the paroxysmal cough. Dr Jantjies, an intern who had recently completed her Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) training, was receiving a routine post-training follow-up visit from her IMCI supervisor. Dr Jantjies carried out a thorough IMCI check-up and found that Jabu's respiratory rate was increased. She then checked to see if the baby had chest indrawing, which he had, although only slightly. She immediately referred Jabu to the hospital. Once the infant was gone, a shaken Dr Jantjies told the supervisor, 'It was only because you were here that I took his respiratory rate and that led to the complete exam. IMCI saved this baby from being sent home. Who knows what could have happened.... ' Less fortunate was Ntombi, a 2-year-old girl. When her mother visited the clinic, Ntombi was examined by a nurse using the IMCI approach and diagnosed with pneumonia. She received ambulatory treatment and clear instructions about when to return. When Ntombi didn't get better and started to have laboured breathing, her parents took her to a hospital where staff had not received IMCI training. The doctor there sent her home. She died 2 days later in the same hospital. Throughout South Africa, medical students, nurses, family practitioners and experienced paediatricians alike are learning the virtues of IMCI as a protocol for paediatric consultations, one that significantly reduces the chances of missing something that may be wrong with a child. Launched in 1996 by the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF, IMCI is currently being implemented in over 100 countries worldwide to promote healthy growth and development in children younger than 5 years and to reduce mortality and morbidity from the principal causes of childhood illness. 1 Its challenge was to move from the vertical disease-specific approach of traditional programmes to a more integrated and horizontal child approach, in line with the philosophy of primary health care. In South Africa, the strategy has been expanding its influence for the last 8 years, with over 8 000 health professionals trained in IMCI and it being used at clinics in all 52 districts in the country.
    The S.A. journal of continuing medical education = Die S.A. tydskrif van voortgesette geneeskundige onderrig 01/2007; 25(4):172.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 30, 2014