The psychological impact of mild ovarian stimulation combined with single embryo transfer compared with conventional IVF

Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
Human Reproduction (Impact Factor: 4.59). 04/2006; 21(3):721-7. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei395
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to assess the psychological implications of mild ovarian stimulation combined with single embryo transfer (SET) during a first IVF cycle.
We conducted a randomized controlled two-centre trial. Three hundred and ninety-one couples were randomized to undergo either mild ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonist co-treatment and SET (n=199) or conventional GnRH agonist long protocol ovarian stimulation with double embryo transfer (DET) (n=192). Women completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Hopkins Symptom Checklist and the Subjective Sleep Quality Scale at baseline, on the first day of ovarian stimulation and following embryo transfer. Affect was assessed daily with the Daily Record Keeping Chart from the first day of ovarian stimulation until the day treatment outcome became known.
The conventional IVF group experienced elevated levels of physical and depressive symptoms during pituitary downregulation. At oocyte retrieval, this group experienced more positive affect and less negative affect than the mild IVF group. In the conventional IVF group, cycle cancellation was associated with less positive and more negative affect.
During the first IVF treatment cycle, mild ovarian stimulation and SET does not lead to more psychological complaints than conventional IVF.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The introduction of mild cycle IVF adds to the repertoire of fertility treatments. However, its place is still novel and is contested within the literature. Women's experiences of mild cycle IVF have received minimal attention. The aim of the study was to explore women's perspectives regarding mild cycle IVF. In this qualitative thematic analysis study, 17 women, and 2 partners were interviewed regarding their perceptions of 'mild' cycle IVF. Data were thematically analysed to identify the key aspects of participants' perceptions. Participants reported that 'mild' cycle IVF offered a number of positive aspects, including the reduction in the intrusion of IVF procedures in women's lives, the short timeframe spent in awaiting the results and the way mild cycle worked with women's natural hormonal cycles. 'Mild' cycle IVF was perceived positively by the participants particularly in terms of timeframes and the impact on their physical and emotional wellbeing.
    Human Reproduction 11/2011; 27(1):167-72. DOI:10.1093/humrep/der361 · 4.59 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cumulative IVF pregnancy rates are compromised by the large number of couples who drop-out of treatment before achieving pregnancy. The aim of this study was to identify the role of the treatment strategy applied, and potential other factors that influence the decision of couples to discontinue treatment. The incidence of drop-out from IVF treatment and factors related to drop-out were studied in a cohort of IVF patients aged <38 years embarking on IVF treatment either with a mild or a standard treatment strategy for a planned maximum number of treatment cycles. Of the 384 couples studied, 17% dropped out of IVF treatment. The physical or psychological burden of treatment was the most frequent cause of drop-out (28%). The application of a mild treatment strategy (mild ovarian stimulation along with the transfer of a single embryo) significantly reduced the chance of drop-out (hazard ratio (HR) 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.31-0.96). When a mild IVF strategy was employed, the association between the baseline anxiety score and drop-out was reduced by >50%. The presence of severe male subfertility (HR 4.80; 95% CI, 1.63-14.13) and the failure to achieve embryo transfer (odds ratio 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24-0.72) were also related to drop-out. Reducing drop-out rate is crucial to further improve the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of IVF treatment. An important factor determining the risk of drop-out is the burden of the treatment strategy. The application of a mild treatment strategy and managing patient's expectations might reduce drop-out rates.
    Human Reproduction 06/2008; 23(9):2050-5. DOI:10.1093/humrep/den219 · 4.59 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The literature supports the efficacy of psychological intervention (psychosocial and psychotherapeutic) for infertile couples. A substantial number of studies show the negative psychological impact of fertility treatments on couples, and the positive effects of psychosocial counselling and other specific psychological interventions for managing anxiety, depression and stress during reproductive technology procedures. Here we present a protocol for guiding clinical intervention, including strategic goals and content. The programme can be used for professional training or for psychological services in infertility units. Finally, some suggestions for professionals working in this field are included, with the aim of promoting good healthcare practices among them, for their clients and for health services. La literatura apoya la eficacia de la intervención psicológica (psicosocial y psicoterapéutica) con parejas infértiles. Un conjunto amplio de estudios aportan evidencia sobre el notable impacto psicológico negativo de los tratamientos de infertilidad en las parejas, y acerca del efecto positivo de la orientación psicosocial y de las intervenciones psicológicas específicas para gestionar la ansiedad, depresión y estrés durante los procedimientos de la tecnología reproductiva. Se presenta un protocolo de orientación para la intervención clínica que incluye objetivos estratégicos y contenidos de un programa. El programa es utilizable tanto para formar a los profesionales como para ser aplicado en los servicios psicológicos de las clínicas de infertilidad. Finalmente se aportan recomendaciones para los profesionales que trabajan en este ámbito de la salud con el objetivo de promover buenas prácticas de atención tanto para ellos, sus clientes y los servicios de salud.
    Papeles del Psicologo 01/2008; 29(2).