A geographic information systems (GIS) and spatial modeling approach to assessing indoor radon potential at local level.

California Department of Health Services, Environmental Health Laboratory Branch, 850 Marina Bay Pkwy, Mailstop G365/EHLB, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.
Applied Radiation and Isotopes (Impact Factor: 1.18). 04/2006; 64(4):490-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.10.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study integrates residential radon data from previous studies in Southern California (USA), into a geographic information system (GIS) linked with statistical techniques. A difference (p<0.05) is found in the indoor radon in residences grouped by radon-potential zones. Using a novel Monte Carlo approach, we found that the mean distance from elevated-radon residences (concentration>74 Bq m(-3)) to epicenters of large (> 4 Richter) earthquakes was smaller (p<0.0001) than the average residence-to-epicenter distance, suggesting an association between the elevated indoor-radon and seismic activities.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Public health concerns have brought a renewed interest in radon. This resurgence has brought together many scientists from different disciplines to work on the radon questions. It may be that, with this current enhancement of interest, a more general understanding can be achieved, one that provides a broader perspective encompassing both the source and transport of radon. Complementing the health-related studies are additional uses for radon, such as geologic mapping applications, that already are evolving from the new research. The papers of this section of Geophysical Research Letters are devoted to understanding the Occurrence and Transport of Radon in the Natural Environment. They illustrate the diversity of studies that seek to find unifying explanations for the natural behavior of radon. Future research will provide many interesting insights as well as new applications. The 1990's should be a fascinating decade for radon researchers.
    Geophysical Research Letters 01/1990; 17(6). · 3.98 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clear seismic-related anomalies in the radon (222Rn) concentration of the atmosphere were observed prior to the Kobe earthquake (magnitude 7.2) on 17 January 1995. The radon anomalies were observed at a monitoring station in Kobe, which is located about 20 km away from the epicenter. The means of radon concentration in the atmosphere for each day were calculated using the data observed between April 1984 and March 1994, in order to obtain the normal radon variation. The difference between the smoothed radon concentration and the smoothed mean radon concentration is the residual value. Using the weekly averages of residual values in the historical period, the weekly residual value in the validation period were predicted. The historical period was from April 1984 to March 1994. The validation period was from April 1994 to January 1996. The seismic-related radon anomaly higher than the 99% confidence limit of the residual value of radon concentration in the atmosphere was observed beginning about 2 mo before the earthquake.
    Health Physics 06/1997; 72(5):759-61. · 1.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Increasing concern about possible links between radon concentration and certain types of malignant disease has led to local, regional and national surveys being conducted to determine radon levels in soil and indoors. The nature and scale of the spatial variation of radon exhalation in the natural environment are, however, largely unknown. We have applied multistage sampling and a nested analysis of covariance to determine how radon emission varies spatially in the soil. By surveying three areas of increasing geological complexity in the English Midlands, ranging from one principal lithology to several, it has been shown that soil radon values vary in a very erratic way over distances of a few metres. Nevertheless, geostatistical analyses have shown that the longer scale of variation in soil radon is determined by underlying geology.
    Radiation Measurements. 01/1995;