Article

The Taylor Hyperpigmentation Scale: a new visual assessment tool for the evaluation of skin color and pigmentation.

Skin of Color Center, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, New York, USA.
Cutis; cutaneous medicine for the practitioner (Impact Factor: 0.59). 10/2005; 76(4):270-4.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Taylor Hyperpigmentation Scale is a new visual scale developed to provide an inexpensive and convenient method to assess skin color and monitor the improvement of hyperpigmentation following therapy. The tool consists of 15 uniquely colored plastic cards spanning the full range of skin hues and is applicable to individuals with Fitzpatrick skin types I to VI. Each card contains 10 bands of increasingly darker gradations of skin hue that represent progressive levels of hyperpigmentation. This article describes the ongoing development of the Taylor Hyperpigmentation Scale and reports the results of a recent validation study of the use of this newly developed chart in individuals with skin of color. In the study, skin color and an area of hyperpigmentation in 30 subjects of white, African American, Asian, or Hispanic ancestry (approximately 5 from each of the 6 skin types) were evaluated by 10 investigators. The results of the study revealed significant variation among intraindividual and interindividual ratings by investigators of skin hue (P < .0001) and hyperpigmentation (P = .0008); however, most investigators rated the scale as useful and easy to use, and 60% stated they would use it in clinical practice to document the response of hyperpigmentation to therapeutic agents. A heuristic evaluation of the results of this study provided insight into essential considerations for the continued effort to develop a useful and simple scale for assessing skin color and pigmentation.

2 Followers
 · 
193 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Various methods are available for the evaluation of skin color. A skin color scale chart is a convenient and inexpensive tool. However, the correlation between a skin color scale chart and objective measurement has not been evaluated.
    Indian Journal of Dermatology 07/2014; 59(4):339-42. DOI:10.4103/0019-5154.135476
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: http://knol.google.com/k/alejandro-melo-florián/tipos-de-piel-y-susceptibilidad-a/3sktw3ldc86j2/161 Homo sapiens sapiens comprende 3 grupos a saber: Caucasoide, Negroide y Mongoloide. Este sistema de clasificación permite incluir a los individuos con pieles pigmentadas dentro de los grupos negroide y mongoloide. Se ha desarrollado una clasificación de los tipos de piel en relación a su reacción a la exposición solar, que incluye 6 fototipos, clasificación conocida como la de Fitzpatrick y permite conocer la susceptibilidad de lesión dérmica por exposición a radiación UV. En Colombia los resultados de estudios independientes a escala discreta muestran predominio de los fototipos III y IV, los factores medio ambientales de radiación UV que son medidos para nuestro país y que tienden a mostrar valores de exposición en el rango de "extremos", hacen necesario conocer la importancia de las medidas preventivas y medicamentosas de bloqueadores químicos y físicos antisolares para evitar daño acumulativo que aumente fotoenvejecimiento y el riesgo de fotocarcinogénesis.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The background of this article is that assessment and quantification of skin color is important to health care; color is one indicator of overall health and is linked to oxygenation, tissue perfusion, nutritional status, and injury. The purpose is to describe how skin color varies across racial/ethnic groups so that the information can be applied to clinical practice. The method used is cross-sectional, descriptive design (n = 257). We recorded self-defined race/ethnicity and used a spectrophotometer to measure skin color at two anatomic sites. Skin color variables included L* (light/dark), a* (red/green), and b* (yellow/blue). As regards results, we found significant differences in L*, a*, and b* values by site and race/ethnicity in White, Asian, and Biracial participants. L*: F(3, 233) = 139.04, p < .01 and F(3, 233) = 118.47, p < .01. Black participants had significantly lower mean L* values and wider ranges of L*, a*, and b* as compared with other groups. In regard to application, these findings suggest that clinicians and researchers should plan and provide care based on skin color, rather than race/ethnicity.
    Clinical Nursing Research 05/2012; 21(4):495-516. DOI:10.1177/1054773812446510 · 0.87 Impact Factor