Article

Gene Expression Profiling Predicts Survival in Conventional Renal Cell Carcinoma

Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Västerbotten, Sweden
PLoS Medicine (Impact Factor: 14). 01/2006; 3(1):e13. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Conventional renal cell carcinoma (cRCC) accounts for most of the deaths due to kidney cancer. Tumor stage, grade, and patient performance status are used currently to predict survival after surgery. Our goal was to identify gene expression features, using comprehensive gene expression profiling, that correlate with survival.
Gene expression profiles were determined in 177 primary cRCCs using DNA microarrays. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis segregated cRCC into five gene expression subgroups. Expression subgroup was correlated with survival in long-term follow-up and was independent of grade, stage, and performance status. The tumors were then divided evenly into training and test sets that were balanced for grade, stage, performance status, and length of follow-up. A semisupervised learning algorithm (supervised principal components analysis) was applied to identify transcripts whose expression was associated with survival in the training set, and the performance of this gene expression-based survival predictor was assessed using the test set. With this method, we identified 259 genes that accurately predicted disease-specific survival among patients in the independent validation group (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the gene expression predictor was a strong predictor of survival independent of tumor stage, grade, and performance status (p < 0.001).
cRCC displays molecular heterogeneity and can be separated into gene expression subgroups that correlate with survival after surgery. We have identified a set of 259 genes that predict survival after surgery independent of clinical prognostic factors.

0 Followers
 · 
158 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the prognostic significance of Notch1 activation in patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). We retrospectively enrolled 203 patients with ccRCC undergoing nephrectomy at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University between 2003 and 2004. Notch1 activation was assessed by immunohistochemical staining of the intracellular domain of Notch1 (ICN1) in specimens of patients. The Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression models, and Harrell concordance index (C-index) calculation were used to evaluate the prognostic value of ICN1 expression and its association with clinicopathologic features. Tumor tissues from patients with advanced TNM stage and Fuhrman grade exhibited elevated ICN1 expression, which correlated positively with tumor size, Fuhrman grade, and tumor necrosis. Moreover, high ICN1 expression indicated poor overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients with ccRCC. After backward elimination, ICN1 expression, as well as Fuhrman grade, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and TNM stage, was identified as an independent adverse prognostic factor for survival and recurrence. The predictive accuracy of well-established TNM, University of California Integrated Staging System, and Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis prognostic models was improved when ICN1 expression was added. Furthermore, a predictive nomogram was generated with identified independent prognosticators to assess patient survival at 5 years after surgery. Notch1 activation is a potential independent adverse prognostic biomarker for recurrence and survival of patients with ccRCC after nephrectomy. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Urology 01/2015; 85(2). DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.022 · 2.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this review, we summarise the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) alongside grading and staging systems. General applications of immunohistochemistry, cytogenetics, and cDNA microarrays were reviewed with their implications in tumour diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.ResultsRCCs are classified according to the 2004 WHO classification, which defines three main histopathologic tumour subtypes with distinct clinical behaviour and underlying genetic defects: conventional (clear cell), papillary, and chromophobe RCC. Histopathologic classification and specific genetic mutations are crucial in distinguishing between familial and nonfamilial tumours. The most common four-tiered Fuhrman nuclear grade system is recommended for all types of RCC. Tumour grade is assigned according to the highest grade present; staging is assigned using the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer 2002 classification.Conclusions Prognosis of patients with RCCs is most accurately predicted by TNM stage. Within stages, Fuhrman grade has a strong predictive value. Although not considered in nuclear grading, sarcomatoid dedifferentiation is a severely negative event for all RCC subtypes. Histologic subtypes of RCCs are not independent prognostic factors comparable with TNM stage and Fuhrman grade. Histologic coagulative tumour necrosis was an independent prognostic factor of outcome for clear cell and chromophobe RCC. Immunohistochemical panels including RCC marker, CD10, and KIT are now available for differential diagnosis of the distinct RCC subtypes. Genetic studies have improved understanding of subtypes, offering a promising approach for clinical diagnosis, prognosis, and possibly therapy. Urologists should be aware that currently many molecular analyses can be performed on RCCs, and when feasible, fresh samples sent to the pathologist.
    European Urology Supplements 06/2006; 5(8):573-579. DOI:10.1016/j.eursup.2006.03.005 · 3.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples are routinely archived in the course of patient care and can be linked to clinical outcomes with long-term follow-up. However, FFPE tissues have degraded RNA which poses challenges for analyzing gene expression. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is rapidly becoming accepted as an effective tool for measuring gene expressions for research and clinical use. However, the feasibility of NGS has not been firmly established when using FFPE tissue. We optimized strategies for whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) using FFPE tissue. Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) was successfully depleted by competitive hybridization using the Ribo-zeroTM Kit (Epicentre Biotechnologies), and rRNA sequence content was less than one percent for each library. Gene expression measured by FFPE RNA-seq was compared to two different standards: RNA-seq from fresh frozen (FF) tissue and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Both FF and FFPE tumors were sequenced on an Illumina Genome Analyzer IIX with an average of 10 million reads. The distribution of FPKMs (fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped) and number of detected genes were similar between FFPE and FF. RNA-seq expressions from FF and FFPE samples from the same renal cell carcinoma (RCC) correlated highly (r = 0.919 for tumor 1 and r = 0.954 for tumor 2). On hierarchical cluster analysis, samples clustered by patient identity rather than method of preservation. TaqMan qPCR of 424 RCC-related genes correlated highly with FFPE RNA-seq expressions (r = 0.775 for FFPE tumor 1, r = 0.803 for FFPE tumor 2). Expression fold changes were considered, to assess biologic relevance of gene expressions. Expression fold changes between FFPE tumors (tumor 1/tumor 2) correlated well when comparing qPCR and RNA-seq (r = 0.890). Expression fold changes between tumors from different risk groups (our high risk RCC/ The Cancer Genome Atlas, TCGA, low risk RCC) also correlated well when comparing RNA-seq determined from FF and FFPE tumors (r = 0.887). FFPE RNA-seq provides reliable genes expression data comparable to that obtained from fresh frozen tissue. It represents a useful tool for discovery and validation of biomarkers.
    BMC Genomics 12/2014; 15(1):1087. DOI:10.1186/1471-2164-15-1087 · 4.04 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Download
79 Downloads
Available from
Jun 3, 2014