Remediation and Recovery of Uranium from Contaminated Subsurface Environments with Electrodes

Department of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, 203 Morrill 4 North, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA.
Environmental Science and Technology (Impact Factor: 5.33). 12/2005; 39(22):8943-7. DOI: 10.1021/es050457e
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Previous studies have demonstrated that Geobacter species can effectively remove uranium from contaminated groundwater by reducing soluble U(VI) to the relatively insoluble U(IV) with organic compounds serving as the electron donor. Studies were conducted to determine whether electrodes might serve as an alternative electron donor for U(VI) reduction by a pure culture of Geobacter sulfurreducens and microorganisms in uranium-contaminated sediments. Electrodes poised at -500 mV (vs a Ag/AgCl reference) rapidly removed U(VI) from solution in the absence of cells. However, when the poise at the electrode was removed, all of the U(VI) returned to solution, demonstrating that the electrode did not reduce U(VI). If G. sulfurreducens was present on the electrode, U(VI) did not return to solution until the electrode was exposed to dissolved oxygen. This suggeststhat G. sulfurreducens on the electrode reduced U(VI) to U(IV) which was stably precipitated until reoxidized in the presence of oxygen. When an electrode was placed in uranium-contaminated subsurface sediments, U(VI) was removed and recovered from groundwater using poised electrodes. Electrodes emplaced in flow-through columns of uranium-contaminated sediments readily removed U(VI) from the groundwater, and 87% of the uranium that had been removed was recovered from the electrode surface after the electrode was pulled from the sediments. These results suggest that microorganisms can use electrons derived from electrodes to reduce U(VI) and that it may be possible to remove and recover uranium from contaminated groundwater with poised electrodes.

Download full-text


Available from: Kelvin B Gregory, Jan 21, 2015
60 Reads
    • "This interest and the associated progress in research and development during the last decade led to the foundation of the emerging field of microbial electrochemical technologies (MET) [6]. MET now cover different concepts of applications ranging from its archetype the microbial fuel cells (MFCs) [7] [8] via bioelectrochemical resource recovery [9] [10] and microbial electrosynthesis [11] to biocomputing [12]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A modeling platform for microbial electrodes based on electroactive microbial biofilms performing direct electron transfer (DET) is presented. Microbial catabolism and anabolism were coupled with intracellular and extracellular electron transfer, leading to biofilm growth and current generation. The model includes homogeneous electron transfer from cells to a conductive biofilm component, biofilm matrix conduction, and heterogeneous electron transfer to the electrode. Model results for Geobacter based anodes, both at constant electrode potential and in voltammetric (dynamic electrode potential) conditions, were compared to experimental data from different sources. The model can satisfactorily describe microscale (concentration, pH and redox gradients) and macroscale (electric currents, biofilm thickness) properties of Geobacter biofilms. The concentration of electrochemically accessible redox centers, here denominated as cytochromes, involved in the extracellular electron transfer, plays the key role and may differ between constant potential (300mM) and dynamic potential (3mM) conditions. Model results also indicate that the homogeneous and heterogeneous electron transfer rates have to be within the same order of magnitude (1.2s(-1)) for reversible extracellular electron transfer. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 12/2015; 106:194 - 206. DOI:10.1016/j.bioelechem.2015.03.010 · 4.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "SMFCs and PMFCs have great promise, not only for sustainable electricity recovery from the environment, but also for their potential application in supplying electricity in selfpowered devices. Such applications include devices that monitor environmental parameters (Donovan et al., 2008), sensors to monitor the maturity of plants (Chen et al., 2012), and applications in bioremediation, and recovery of heavy metals from contaminated environments (Gregory and Lovley, 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The effects of graphene oxide (GO) on electricity generation in soil microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) and plant microbial fuel cell (PMFCs) were investigated. GO at concentrations ranging from 0 to 1.9 g⋅kg−1 was added to soil and reduced for 10 days under anaerobic incubation. All SMFCs (GO-SMFCs) utilizing the soils incubated with GO produced electricity at a greater rate and in higher quantities than the SMFCs which did not contain GO. In fed-batch operations, the overall average electricity generation in GO-SMFCs containing 1.0 g⋅kg−1 of GO was 40 ± 19 mW⋅m−2, which was significantly higher than the value of 6.6 ± 8.9 mW⋅m−2 generated from GO-free SMFCs (p < 0.05). The increase in catalytic current at the oxidative potential was observed by cyclic voltammetry (CV) for GO-SMFC, with the CV curve suggesting the enhancement of electron transfer from oxidation of organic substances in the soil by the reduced form of GO. The GO-containing PMFC also displayed a greater generation of electricity compared to the PMFC with no added GO, with GO-PMFC producing 49 mW⋅m−2 of electricity after 27 days of operation. Collectively, this study demonstrates that GO added to soil can be microbially reduced in soil, and facilitates electron transfer to the anode in both SMFCs and PMFCs.
    Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 04/2015; 3:42. DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2015.00042
  • Source
    • "The higher value of these reduced final products relative to electricity makes the so-called microbial electrolysis cells more economically attractive. Subsequently, electricity-driven processes have also been applied and widely explored in the context of bioremediation and inorganic/resource recovery [11] [12] [13]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many microorganisms have the innate capability to discharge and/or receive electrons to and from solid state materials such as electrodes. This ability is now used towards innovative processes in wastewater treatment, power generation, production of fuels and biochemicals, bioremediation, desalination and resource recovery, among others. Despite being a dynamic field in science and technology, significant challenges remain towards industrial implementation which include representation of judicious performance indicators. This critical review outlines the progress in current density evaluated per projected surface area of electrodes, the most wide-spread performance indicator. It also proposes guidelines to correct current and exchange current per porous surface area, biofilm covered area, electrochemically- or bioelectrochemically- active surface area, of the electrodes. Recommendations for indicators to describe the environmental and electrochemical robustness of electrochemically-active biofilms are portrayed, including preservation of the predominant functionality as well as electrochemical mechanistic and phenomenological features. A few additional key elements for industrial processing are depicted. Whereas Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs) are the main focus, some important parameters for reporting on cathodic bioproduction performance are also discussed. This critical revision aims to provide key parameters to compare the whole spectrum of microbial electrochemical systems in a consistent way.
    Electrochimica Acta 03/2014; 140. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2014.02.111 · 4.50 Impact Factor
Show more