Etiology and prevention of stillbirth

Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA.
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology (Impact Factor: 3.97). 01/2006; 193(6):1923-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.074
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This is a systematic review of the literature on the causes of stillbirth and clinical opinion regarding strategies for its prevention.
We reviewed the causes of stillbirth by performing a Medline search limited to articles in English published in core clinical journals from January 1, 1995, to January 1, 2005. Articles before this date were included if they added historical information relevant to the topic. A total of 1445 articles obtained, 113 were the basis of this review and chosen based on the criterion that stillbirth or fetal death was central to the article.
Fifteen risk factors for stillbirths were identified and the prevalence of these conditions and associated risks are presented The most prevalent risk factors for stillbirth are prepregnancy obesity, socioeconomic factors, and advanced maternal age. Biologic markers associated with increased stillbirth risk are also reviewed, and strategies for its prevention identified.
Identification of risk factors for stillbirth assists the clinician in performing a risk assessment for each patient. Unexplained stillbirths and stillbirths related to growth restriction are the 2 categories of death that contribute the most to late fetal losses. Late pregnancy is associated with an increasing risk of stillbirth, and clinicians should have a low threshold to evaluate fetal growth. The value of antepartum testing is related to the underlying risk of stillbirth and, although the strategy of antepartum testing in patients with increased risk will decrease the risk of late fetal loss, it is of necessity associated with higher intervention rates.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: But Déterminer les aspects épidémiologique et étiologique de la mort fœtale in utero (MFIU) afin d’en déduire une prise en charge et surtout une prévention adéquates. Matériels et méthodes Nous avons effectué une étude rétrospective allant du 1er juin 2007 au 31 mai 2012, à partir des cas de MFIU de l’hôpital de Creil. Résultats L’incidence de la MFIU était de 4,41 ‰ Les primipares, les femmes de moins de 35 ans, les mères présentant des antécédents obstétricaux, des habitudes toxiques, des antécédents médicaux ou des pathologies familiales génétiques, celles suivies en milieu hospitalier et/ou par des obstétriciens occupaient une proportion considérable. Par ordre de fréquence, nous avons trouvé les pathologies placentaires (41 %), les pathologies fœtales (33,3 %), les pathologies maternelles (12,8 %), les pathologies infectieuses (5,1 %), les causes intrapartum (5,1 %) et les pathologies cordonales (2,6 %). L’accouchement était par voie naturelle chez 84,6 % des cas. Toutes les patientes ont bénéficié des bilans vasculorénal et infectieux, et un examen histologique des annexes. Conclusion L’autopsie et l’examen du placenta sont importants dans la recherche étiologique de la MFIU. Des surveillances plurihebdomadaires du doppler obstétrical et de l’enregistrement du rythme cardiaque foetal pourraient contribuer à la diminution significative de la fréquence de cette pathologie.
    Revue de médecine périnatale 03/2014; 6(1):49-56. DOI:10.1007/s12611-014-0264-x
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stillbirth rates have changed little over the last decade, and a high proportion of cases are unexplained. This meta-analysis examined whether there are inequalities in stillbirth risks according to sex. A systematic review of the literature was conducted, and data were obtained on more than 30 million birth outcomes reported in observational studies. The pooled relative risk of stillbirth was estimated using random-effects models. The crude mean rate (stillbirths/1,000 total births) was 6.23 for males and 5.74 for females. The pooled relative risk was 1.10 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-1.13). The attributable fraction in the whole population was 4.2% (95% CI: 3.70-4.63), and the attributable fraction among male fetuses was 7.8% (95% CI: 7.0-8.66). Study populations from countries with known sex-biased sex selection issues had anomalous stillbirth sex ratios and higher overall stillbirth risks than other countries, reflecting increased mortality among females. Risk of stillbirth in males is elevated by about 10%. The population-attributable risk is comparable to smoking and equates to approximately 100,000 stillbirths per year globally. The pattern is consistent across countries of varying incomes. Given current difficulties in reducing stillbirth rates, work to understand the causes of excess male risk is warranted. We recommend that stillbirths are routinely recorded by sex. This will also assist in exposing prenatal sex selection as elevated or equal risks of stillbirth in females would be readily apparent and could therefore be used to trigger investigation.
    BMC Medicine 01/2014; 12:220. DOI:10.1186/s12916-014-0220-4 · 7.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Smoking in pregnancy is known to be associated with a range of adverse pregnancy outcomes, yet there is a high prevalence of smoking among pregnant women in many countries, and it remains a major public health concern. We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide contemporary estimates of the association between maternal smoking in pregnancy and the risk of stillbirth. We searched four databases namely MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psych Info and Web of Science for all relevant original studies published until 31(st) December 2012. We included observational studies that measured the association between maternal smoking during pregnancy and the risk of stillbirth. 1766 studies were screened for title analysis, of which 34 papers (21 cohorts, 8 case controls and 5 cross sectional studies) met the inclusion criteria. In meta-analysis smoking during pregnancy was significantly associated with a 47% increase in the odds of stillbirth (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.37, 1.57, p < 0.0001). In subgroup analysis, smoking 1-9 cig/day and ≥10 cig/day was associated with an 9% and 52% increase in the odds of stillbirth respectively. Subsequently, studies defining stillbirth at ≥ 20 weeks demonstrated a 43% increase in odds for smoking mothers compared to mothers who do not smoke, (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.32, 1.54, p < 0.0001), whereas studies with stillbirth defined at ≥ 24 weeks and ≥ 28 weeks showed 58% and 33% increase in the odds of stillbirth respectively. Our review confirms a dose-response effect of maternal smoking in pregnancy on risk of stillbirth. To minimise the risk of stillbirth, reducing current smoking prevalence in pregnancy should continue to be a key public health high priority.
    BMC Public Health 12/2015; 15(1):1552. DOI:10.1186/s12889-015-1552-5 · 2.32 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 4, 2014