Eukaryotic Lsm proteins: lessons from bacteria.

Department of Microbiology, Immunology & Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA.
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (Impact Factor: 11.63). 01/2006; 12(12):1031-6. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb1037
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Over the last five years Sm-like (Lsm) proteins have emerged as important players in many aspects of RNA metabolism, including splicing, nuclear RNA processing and messenger RNA decay. However, their precise function in these pathways remains somewhat obscure. In contrast, the role of the bacterial Lsm protein Hfq, which bears striking similarities in both structure and function to Lsm proteins, is much better characterized. In this perspective, we have highlighted several functions that Hfq shares with Lsm proteins and put forward hypotheses based on parallels between the two that might further the understanding of Lsm function.

Download full-text


Available from: Carol J Wilusz, Jun 25, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sm and Sm-like proteins represent an evolutionarily conserved family with key roles in RNA metabolism. Sm-based regulation is diverse and can range in scope from eukaryotic mRNA splicing to bacterial quorum sensing, with at least one step in these processes being mediated by an RNA-associated molecular assembly built on Sm proteins. Despite the availability of several 3D-structures of Sm-like archaeal proteins (SmAPs), 1265 their function has remained elusive. The aim of this study was to shed light on the function of SmAP1 and SmAP2 of the crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus (Sso). Using co-purification followed by RNASeq different classes of non-coding RNAs and mRNAs were identified that co-purified either with both paralogues or solely with Sso-SmAP1 or Sso-SmAP2. The large number of associated intron-containing tRNAs and tRNA/rRNA modifying RNAs may suggest a role of the two Sso-SmAPs in tRNA/rRNA processing. Moreover, the 3D structure of Sso-SmAP2 was elucidated. Like Sso-SmAP1, Sso-SmAP2 forms homoheptamers. The binding of both proteins to distinct RNA substrates is discussed in terms of surface conservation, structural differences in the RNA binding sites and differences in the electrostatic surface potential of the two Sso-SmAP proteins. Taken together, this study may hint to common and different functions of both Sso-SmAPs in Sso RNA metabolism.
    06/2015; 5(2):1264-1281. DOI:10.3390/life5021264
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Roseobacter clade aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria (AAnP) are abundant in photic zone environments of marine ecosystems. These bacteria form a photosynthetic apparatus at oxygen saturation, a situation expected to generate high levels of singlet oxygen (¹O₂) when light is present. Rhodobacter sphaeroides, an anaerobic anoxygenic phototroph, represses photosynthesis genes at high oxygen tension. Here we report that Roseobacter denitrificans showed higher sensitivity to ¹O₂ compared with Rhb. sphaeroides. While photosynthetic membranes of Rsb. denitrificans generated more ¹O₂ during light exposure, key regulator genes rpoE and rpoH(II) were more strongly induced in response to ¹O₂ stress compared with Rhb. sphaeroides. The regulon controlled by RpoE was different in Rsb. denitrificans and Rhb. sphaeroides. Patterns of synthesized soluble proteins strongly changed upon high light exposure in Rsb. denitrificans but not in Rhb. sphaeroides, and most changes were not further promoted by artificial ¹O₂ generation. The strong increase of small RNA RDs2461 levels by photooxidative stress implies a role for sRNAs in post-transcriptional regulation of the response to ¹O₂ in AAnPs. Our data reveal similarities but also significant differences in the response of Rsb. denitrificans and Rhb. sphaeroides to ¹O₂, most likely a consequence of their different lifestyles.
    Environmental Microbiology 11/2010; 13(3):775-91. DOI:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02381.x · 6.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The targeting of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) to specific subcellular sites for local translation plays an important role in diverse cellular and developmental processes in eukaryotes, including axis formation, cell fate determination, spindle pole regulation, cell motility, and neuronal synaptic plasticity. Recently, a new conserved class of Lsm proteins, the Scd6 family, has been implicated in controlling mRNA function. Depletion or mutation of members of the Scd6 family, Caenorhabditis elegans CAR-1 and Drosophila melanogaster trailer hitch, lead to a variety of developmental phenotypes, which in some cases can be linked to alterations in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Scd6/Lsm proteins are RNA binding proteins and are found in RNP complexes associated with translational control of mRNAs, and these complexes can colocalize with the ER. These findings raise the possibility that localization and translational regulation of mRNAs at the ER plays a role in controlling the organization of this organelle.
    The Journal of Cell Biology 05/2006; 173(2):159-63. DOI:10.1083/jcb.200601153 · 9.69 Impact Factor