The evolution of species' distributions: reciprocal transplants across the elevation ranges of Mimulus cardinalis and M. lewisii.

Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824, USA.
Evolution (Impact Factor: 4.66). 09/2005; 59(8):1671-84. DOI: 10.1554/05-107.1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Every species occupies a limited geographic area, but it remains unclear why traits that limit distribution do not evolve to allow range expansion. Hypotheses for the evolutionary stability of geographic ranges assume that species are maladapted at the range boundary and unfit beyond the current range, but this assumption has rarely been tested. To examine how fitness varies across species' ranges, we reciprocally transplanted two species of monkeyflowers, Mimulus cardinalis and M. lewisii, within and beyond their present elevation ranges. We used individuals of known parentage from populations collected across the elevation ranges of both species to examine whether populations are adapted to position within the range. For both species we found the greatest average fitness at elevations central within the range, reduced fitness at the range margin, and zero or near-zero fitness when transplanted beyond their present elevation range limits. However, the underlying causes of fitness variation differed between the species. At high elevations beyond its range, M. cardinalis displayed reduced growth and fecundity, whereas at low elevations M. lewisii experienced high mortality. Weak differences in performance were observed among populations within each species and these were not related to elevation of origin. Low fitness of both species at their range margin and weak differentiation among populations within each species suggest that adaptation to the environment at and beyond the range margin is hindered, illustrating that range margins provide an interesting system in which to study limits to adaptation.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Flowering time and water-use efficiency (WUE) are two ecological traits that are important for plant drought response. To understand the evolutionary significance of natural genetic variation in flowering time, WUE, and WUE plasticity to drought in Arabidopsis thaliana, we addressed the following questions: (1) How are ecophysiological traits genetically correlated within and between different soil moisture environments? (2) Does terminal drought select for early flowering and drought escape? (3) Is WUE plasticity to drought adaptive and/or costly? We measured a suite of ecophysiological and reproductive traits on 234 spring flowering accessions of A. thaliana grown in well-watered and season-ending soil drying treatments, and quantified patterns of genetic variation, correlation, and selection within each treatment. WUE and flowering time were consistently positively genetically correlated. WUE was correlated with WUE plasticity, but the direction changed between treatments. Selection generally favored early flowering and low WUE, with drought favoring earlier flowering significantly more than well-watered conditions. Selection for lower WUE was marginally stronger under drought. There were no net fitness costs of WUE plasticity. WUE plasticity (per se) was globally neutral, but locally favored under drought. Strong genetic correlation between WUE and flowering time may facilitate the evolution of drought escape, or constrain independent evolution of these traits. Terminal drought favored drought escape in these spring flowering accessions of A. thaliana. WUE plasticity may be favored over completely fixed development in environments with periodic drought.
    Ecology and Evolution 11/2014; 4(23). DOI:10.1002/ece3.1270 · 1.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Aims Phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation of populations at their distributional limits are crucial to understand species colonization and persistence in novel or marginal environments, as well as species divergence and niche width evolution. We assess the contribution of these processes to shape current elevational limits and determine elevational phenotypic divergence between two subspecies of Aquilegia vulgaris (subsp. vulgaris and nevadensis). Methods We conducted sowing and transplant experiments considering four elevations throughout the current elevational range of Aquilegia vulgaris in southern Iberian Peninsula. Experiments were designed to explore, on the one hand, local adaptation through three components of performance (germination, survival and growth) and, on the other hand, the phenotypic differentiation and/or plasticity associated to local adaptation. Four populations per subspecies (three from the elevational core and one from the elevational boundary) were used as seed sources. Patterns of local adaptation and phenotypic differentiation are examined in the context of the “centre-periphery” hypothesis. Important Findings Central populations of both subspecies performed better at their local elevations while marginal populations were maladapted, confirming the hypothesis and contributing to explain the current elevational segregation of these subspecies. Density of glandular pubescence and germination timing seem to be related to local adaptation, through phenotypic differentiation between subspecies or elevations. The widespread subsp. vulgaris showed signals of adaptive plasticity in the timing of germination while it was not the case in the endemic subsp. nevadensis.
    Journal of Plant Ecology 05/2014; 8(3). DOI:10.1093/jpe/rtu017 · 2.28 Impact Factor
  • Source