Article

Transforming systems of care: the American Association of Community Psychiatrists Guidelines for Recovery Oriented Services.

Allegheny County Office of Behavioral Health, 304 Wood Street, 5th Floor, Pittsburgh, PA 15222, USA.
Community Mental Health Journal (Impact Factor: 1.03). 01/2006; 41(6):757-74. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-005-6433-4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Thinking about recovery has grown significantly over the last 70 years, and particularly in the past fifteen. Promotion of recovery has recently been recognized as an organizing principle for the transformation of behavioral health services. Recovery is a personal process of growth and change which typically embraces hope, autonomy and affiliation as elements of establishing satisfying and productive lives in spite of disabling conditions or experiences. Recovery oriented services replace paternalistic, illness oriented perspectives with collaborative, autonomy enhancing approaches and represent a major cultural shift in service delivery. Recovery oriented services replace the myth of chronicity and dependence with a message of individualism, empowerment and choice in the context of collaborative relationships with service providers. The American Association of Community Psychiatrists has developed Guidelines for Recovery Oriented Services to facilitate the transformation of services to this new paradigm. The guidelines are divided into three domains: administration, treatment, and supports, each consisting of several elements for which recovery enhancing characteristics are defined. Several example indicators are also provided for each element. This paper presents these guidelines and discusses their application.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
72 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Policies generate accountability in that they offer a standard against which government performance can be assessed. A central question of this study is whether ideological imprint left by policy is realized in the time following its adoption. National mental health policy expressly promotes the notion of deinstitutionalization, which mandates that individuals be cared for in the community rather than in institutional environments. Methods We investigate whether mental health policy adoption induced a transformation in the structure of mental health systems, namely psychiatric beds, using panel data on 193 countries between 2001 and 2011. Results Our striking regression results demonstrate that late-adopters of mental health policy are more likely to reduce psychiatric beds in mental hospitals and other biomedical settings than innovators, whereas they are less likely than non-adopters to reduce psychiatric beds in general hospitals. Conclusions It can be inferred late adopters are motivated to implement deinstitutionalization for technical efficiency rather than legitimacy reasons.
    International Journal of Mental Health Systems 11/2014; 8(47). DOI:10.1186/1752-4458-8-47 · 1.06 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There has long been a lack of recovery-oriented programs in Taiwan. The investigators launched the first program of this kind and applied the strengths perspective as the intervention model to facilitate the recovery of people with persistent psychiatric disability for two years. This study aimed to explore the attitudes towards and enactment of case managers on the application of the model. To fully understand the case managers' experiences, a qualitative approach with an in-depth interview was adopted. The interview was conducted twice with 10 case managers. The first time was three months after the program began and the second was one year after. The questions included their prior practice model, their thoughts about the strengths model, the changes in attitudes, their enactment of the principles of the model, the specific skills utilised, the impacts of the model on themselves and their organisation, the difficulties encountered and their coping methods. The transformation of practice modality took place incrementally, from pathology to a strengths and recovery-oriented mindset, from alienation to trusting and partnership, from directive to client self-determination, from being anxious to being flexible and patient, and from a single approach to a plural one. The investigators classified the case managers into four categories based on four aspects, i.e. belief, knowledge, enactment of the principles, and skills. The findings reveal that the belief system that case managers hold is critical. When they can fully embrace and internalise the perspective, they will practice efficiently. However, sometimes the belief and enactment are challenged and affected by external constraints. Therefore, the application appeared to be a bittersweet process for them and was filled with both successful stories and difficulties. The transformation of modality from pathology to strengths oriented is possible. Both system change and persistent application of this model are necessary for its future growth and development.
    Asia Pacific journal of social work 04/2014; 24(1-2):29-44. DOI:10.1080/02185385.2014.885207 · 0.04 Impact Factor
  • Source