Shifts in caterpillar biomass phenology due to climate change and its impact on the breeding biology of an insectivorous bird. Oecologia

Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), P.O. Box 40, 6666 ZG, Heteren, The Netherlands.
Oecologia (Impact Factor: 3.09). 03/2006; 147(1):164-72. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0299-6
Source: PubMed


Timing of reproduction has major fitness consequences, which can only be understood when the phenology of the food for the offspring is quantified. For insectivorous birds, like great tits (Parus major), synchronisation of their offspring needs and abundance of caterpillars is the main selection pressure. We measured caterpillar biomass over a 20-year period and showed that the annual peak date is correlated with temperatures from 8 March to 17 May. Laying dates also correlate with temperatures, but over an earlier period (16 March-20 April). However, as we would predict from a reliable cue used by birds to time their reproduction, also the food peak correlates with these temperatures. Moreover, the slopes of the phenology of the birds and caterpillar biomass, when regressed against the temperatures in this earlier period, do not differ. The major difference is that due to climate change, the relationship between the timing of the food peak and the temperatures over the 16 March-20 April period is changing, while this is not so for great tit laying dates. As a consequence, the synchrony between offspring needs and the caterpillar biomass has been disrupted in the recent warm decades. This may have severe consequences as we show that both the number of fledglings as well as their fledging weight is affected by this synchrony. We use the descriptive models for both the caterpillar biomass peak as for the great tit laying dates to predict shifts in caterpillar and bird phenology 2005-2100, using an IPCC climate scenario. The birds will start breeding earlier and this advancement is predicted to be at the same rate as the advancement of the food peak, and hence they will not reduce the amount of the current mistiming of about 10 days.

Download full-text


Available from: Marcel E Visser, Nov 27, 2014
1 Follower
143 Reads
  • Source
    • "Therefore, under increased temperatures, range expansion of residents would be more likely to occur. Other components of migrant life history may place additional pressures on these species with climate change, such as mismatches in migratory timing, e.g. with food supplies (Visser et al. 2006), and increased variability of weather events during migration (Hedenström et al. 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mounting evidence shows that organisms have already begun to respond to global climate change. Advances in our knowledge of how climate shapes species distributional patterns has helped us better understand the response of birds to climate change. However, the distribution of birds across the landscape is also driven by biotic and abiotic components, including habitat characteristics. We therefore developed statistical models of 147 bird species distributions in the eastern United States, using climate, elevation, and the distributions of 39 tree species to predict contemporary bird distributions. We used randomForest, a robust regression-based decision tree ensemble method to predict contemporary bird distributions. These models were then projected onto three models of climate change under high and low emission scenarios for both climate and the projected change in suitable habitat for the 39 tree species. The resulting bird species models indicated that breeding habitat will decrease by at least 10% for 61Á79 species (depending on model and emissions scenario) and increase by at least 10% for 38Á52 species in the eastern United States. Alternatively, running the species models using only climate/elevation (omitting tree species), we found that the predictive power of these models was significantly reduced (p B0.001). When these climate/elevation-only models were projected onto the climate change scenarios, the change in suitable habitat was more extreme in 60% of the species. In the end, the strong associations with vegetation tempers a climate/elevation-only response to climate change and indicates that refugia of suitable habitat may persist for these bird species in the eastern US, even after the redistribution of tree species. These results suggest the importance of interacting biotic processes and that further fine-scale research exploring how climate change may disrupt species specific requirements is needed. Mounting evidence shows that a wide variety of organisms have already begun to respond to global climate change (Thomas and Lennon 1999, Walther et al. 2002, Parmesan 2006), a trend that is likely to intensify with accelerating changes in climate. Some of the most compelling evidence for species responses to climate change is being documented in bird species. These changes include shifts in migratory arrival dates (Beaumont et al. 2006, Jonzen et al. 2006), mismatches in timing of resource availability (Visser et al. 2006, Waite and Strickland 2006), and advances in nesting dates (Winkler et al. 2002, Both et al. 2005). In addition, many bird species in North America have exhibited north-ward expansion of wintering (La Sorte and Thompson 2007) and breeding (Hitch and Leberg 2007) limits of 1Á2 km yr (1 over the last 30 yr. Projections for accelerating increases in temperatures and changes in precipitation patterns over the next century are expected to change the future distribution and population sizes across many taxa substantially (Kareiva et al. 1993).
    Ecography 01/2021; 34(6). DOI:10.2307/41315772 · 4.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "They concluded that the taxonomic breadth of the population declines implicates declines in populations of flying insects as a likely factor, and that insect declines are likely associated with the longrange transport of atmospheric pollutants associated with acid precipitation. But continental effects of the El Niño Southern Oscillation (Sillett et al. 2000, Wolfe and Ralph 2009), the North Atlantic Oscillation (Stokke et al. 2005), or climate-change related effects on insect abundance (Visser et al. 2006) and phenological mismatches (Both et al. 2006) could also produce geographical patterns in population trends (Nebel et al. 2010). The Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor) is a long-distance migratory, aerial insectivore whose breeding range is widely distributed across North America. "
    The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 09/2015; 127(3):528-533. DOI:10.1676/14-181.1 · 0.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Similarly, great tits use early spring temperature (or another cue that is strongly correlated with it) to match their breeding date to a peak in food abundance (Nussey et al. 2005; Charmantier et al. 2008). What directly influences selection on breeding time is not spring temperature per se, but the date of the food peak (Reed et al. 2013; Chevin et al. 2015), which is known to correlate with spring temperature (Visser et al. 2006). Another class of examples is inducible defenses to predators. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Phenotypically plastic characters may respond to multiple variables in their environment, but the evolutionary consequences of this phenomenon have rarely been addressed theoretically. We model the evolution of linear reaction norms in response to several correlated environmental variables, in a population undergoing stationary environmental fluctuations. At evolutionary equilibrium, the linear combination of environmental variables that acts as a developmental cue for the plastic trait is the multivariate best linear predictor of changes in the optimum. However, the reaction norm with respect to any single environmental variable may exhibit non-intuitive patterns. Apparently maladaptive and hyper-adaptive plasticity can evolve with respect to single environmental variables, and costs of plasticity may increase, rather than reduce, plasticity in response to some variables. We also find conditions for the evolution of an indirect environmental indicator that affects expression of a plastic phenotype, despite not influencing natural selection on it. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Evolution 08/2015; DOI:10.1111/evo.12755 · 4.61 Impact Factor
Show more