Inadequacy of manual measurements compared to automated CT volumetry in assessment of treatment response of pulmonary metastases using RECIST criteria.

Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Germany.
European Radiology (Impact Factor: 4.34). 04/2006; 16(4):781-90. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-0036-x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to compare relative values of manual unidimensional measurements (MD) and automated volumetry (AV) for longitudinal treatment response assessment in patients with pulmonary metastases. Fifty consecutive patients with pulmonary metastases and repeat chest multidetector-row CT (median interval=2 months) were independently assessed by two radiologists for treatment response using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST). Statistics included relative measurement errors (RME), intra-/interobserver correlations, limits of agreement (95% LoA), and kappa. A total of 202 metastases (median volume=182.22 mm(3); range=3.16-5,195.13 mm(3)) were evaluated. RMEs were significantly higher for MD than for AV (intraobserver RME=2.34-3.73% and 0.15-0.22% for MD and AV respectively; P<0.05. Interobserver RME=3.53-3.76% and 0.22-0.29% for MD and AV respectively; P<0.05). Overall correlation was significantly better for AV than for MD (P<0.05). Intraobserver 95% LoAs were -1.85 to 1.75 mm for MD and -11.28 to 9.84 mm(3) for AV. The interobserver 95% LoA were -1.46 to 1.92 mm for MD and -11.17 to 9.33 mm(3) for AV. There was total intra-/interobserver agreement on response using AV (kappa=1). MD intra- and interobserver agreements were 0.73-0.84 and 0.77-0.80 respectively. Of the 200 MD response ratings, 28 (14/50 patients) were discordant. Agreement using MD dropped significantly from total remission to progressive disease (P<0.05). We therefore conclude that AV allows for better reproducibility of response evaluation in pulmonary metastases and should be preferred to MD in these patients.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bei Krebserkrankungen dienen radiologische Verfahren zur Abschätzung der Tumorlast und des Therapieansprechens. In der Mehrzahl der Fälle wird hierbei auf manuell bestimmte Größenänderungen von Primärtumoren, aber auch von Metastasen, mittels Durchmesserbestimmungen nach den gängigen Beurteilungskriterien der RECIST (,,response evaluation criteria in solid tumors“) und WHO zurückgegriffen. Die Exaktheit und Reproduzierbarkeit solcher Messungen unterliegt einer nicht unerheblichen Variabilität. Neuere Methoden zur Tumorlastbestimmung mittels Volumetrie von z. B. Lungenrundherden, Leber- oder Lymphknotenmetastasen sind teilweise schon in klinischem Gebrauch, teilweise auch noch Gegenstand klinischer Evaluation. Der folgende Artikel soll einen Überblick über den derzeitigen Stand der Dinge geben.
    Der Radiologe 09/2008; 48(9). · 0.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tumour response assessment to therapy is crucial in oncology. We analysed the morphology of liver metastases (LM) in gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) patients to determine whether uni-dimensional measurement of lesions by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST), accurately reflects lesion volume. The volumes of LM (n=139) from a GIST patient cohort were measured using computed tomography (CT) at baseline, 3, 6 and 12months after commencement of imatinib therapy. Baseline measurements were obtained by two independent investigators and inter-observer agreement assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Actual lesion volumes (VACTUAL) were measured and compared with volumes based on the RECIST measure (VRECIST), and with volumes based on three orthogonal measures (VELLIPSOID) at several time-points. At baseline, the inter-observer bias for VACTUAL was just 1.8%. VRECIST and VELLIPSOID overestimated VACTUAL by a mean of 35% and only 9% respectively (P<0.0001 for both). At baseline, 44% (61/139) of LM were classified as spheroidal and 56% (78/139) as ellipsoidal. During treatment, only 42% of LM retained their original morphology. The remainder demonstrated significant changes in morphology (from spheroidal to ellipsoidal and vice versa) over time, while the RECIST measure did not reflect such changes. The morphology of LM in GIST is rarely spherical (an underlying assumption for RECIST) and can change considerably during imatinib therapy. In this setting, measurements using RECIST do not reflect changes in size and morphology. Additionally, whilst VELLIPSOID is a more suitable surrogate for volume estimation, it is still somewhat limited by the morphology and orientation of such lesions. Studies are warranted to further explore the clinical impact of these findings.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 01/2014; · 4.12 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the accuracy of advanced non-linear registration of serial lung Computed Tomography (CT) images using Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping (LDDMM). FIFTEEN CASES OF LUNG CANCER WITH SERIAL LUNG CT IMAGES (INTERVAL: 62.2±26.9 days) were used. After affine transformation, three dimensional, non-linear volume registration was conducted using LDDMM with or without cascading elasticity control. Registration accuracy was evaluated by measuring the displacement of landmarks placed on vessel bifurcations for each lung segment. Subtraction images and Jacobian color maps, calculated from the transformation matrix derived from image warping, were generated, which were used to evaluate time-course changes of the tumors. The average displacement of landmarks was 0.02±0.16 mm and 0.12±0.60 mm for proximal and distal landmarks after LDDMM transformation with cascading elasticity control, which was significantly smaller than 3.11±2.47 mm and 3.99±3.05 mm, respectively, after affine transformation. Emerged or vanished nodules were visualized on subtraction images, and enlarging or shrinking nodules were displayed on Jacobian maps enabled by highly accurate registration of the nodules using LDDMM. However, some residual misalignments were observed, even with non-linear transformation when substantial changes existed between the image pairs. LDDMM provides accurate registration of serial lung CT images, and temporal subtraction images with Jacobian maps help radiologists to find changes in pulmonary nodules.
    PLoS ONE 01/2014; 9(1):e85580. · 3.53 Impact Factor