Article

Duration of protection with RTS,S/AS02A malaria vaccine in prevention of Plasmodium falciparum disease in Mozambican children: single-blind extended follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.

Centre de Salut Internacional, Hospital Clínic/ Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Universitat de Barcelona, Villarroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
The Lancet (Impact Factor: 39.21). 01/2006; 366(9502):2012-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67669-6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT RTS,S/AS02A is a pre-erythrocytic stage malaria vaccine that provides partial protection against infection in malaria-naive adult volunteers and hyperimmune adults. A previous report showed that this vaccine reduced risk of clinical malaria, delayed time to new infection, and reduced episodes of severe malaria over 6 months in African children. An important remaining issue is the durability of protection against clinical disease in these children.
We did a randomised, controlled, phase IIb trial of RTS,S/AS02A given at 0, 1, and 2 months in 2022 Mozambican children aged 1-4 years. We previously determined vaccine efficacy (VE) against clinical malaria in a double-blind phase that included study months 2.5-8.5 (VE(2.5-8.5)). We now report VE in a single-blind phase up to month 21 (VE(8.5-21)). The primary endpoint was time to first or only clinical episode of Plasmodium falciparum malaria (axillary temperature 37.5 degrees C and P falciparum asexual parasitaemia >2500 per microL) detected through a passive case detection system. We also determined VE for other case definitions and for episodes of severe malaria. This study is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00197041.
During the single-blind phase, VE(8.5-21) was 28.9% (95% CI 8.4-44.8; p=0.008). At month 21, prevalence of P falciparum infection was 29% lower in the RTS,S/AS02A group than in the control (p=0.017). Considering the entire study period, VE(2.5-21) was 35.3% (95% CI 21.6-46.6; p<0.0001) and VE(2.5-21) for severe malaria was 48.6% (95% CI 12.3-71.0; p=0.02).
These results show that RTS,S/AS02A confers partial protection in African children aged 1-4 years living in rural endemic areas against a range of clinical disease caused by P falciparum for at least 18 months, and confirm the potential of malaria vaccines to become credible control tools for public-health use.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
70 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Malaria continues to exact a great human toll in tropical settings. Antimalarial resistance is rife and the parasite inexorably develops mechanisms to outwit our best drugs, including the now first-line choice, artesunate. Novel strategies to circumvent resistance are needed. Here we detail drug development focusing on heat shock protein 90 and its central role as a chaperone. A growing body of evidence supports the role for Hsp90 inhibitors as adjunctive drugs able to restore susceptibility to traditionally efficacious compounds like chloroquine.
    Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland). 01/2013; 2(1):33-54.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Malaria is a significant global burden but after >30 years of effort there is no vaccine on the market. While the complex life cycle of the parasite presents several challenges, many years of research have also identified several mechanisms of immune evasion by Plasmodium spp. Recent research on malaria, has investigated the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathway which mediates exhaustion of T cells, characterized by poor effector functions and recall responses and in some cases loss of the cells by apoptosis. Such studies have shown exhaustion of CD4(+) T cells and an unappreciated role for CD8(+) T cells in promoting sterile immunity against blood stage malaria. This is because PD-1 mediates up to a 95% reduction in numbers and functional capacity of parasite-specific CD8(+) T cells, thus masking their role in protection. The role of T cell exhaustion during malaria provides an explanation for the absence of sterile immunity following the clearance of acute disease which will be relevant to future malaria-vaccine design and suggests the need for novel therapeutic solutions. This review will thus examine the role of PD-1-mediated T cell exhaustion in preventing lasting immunity against malaria.
    Frontiers in Microbiology 05/2014; 5:249. · 3.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A primary concern for the RTS,S malaria vaccine candidate is duration of protection. The ongoing Phase III trial reported evidence of waning efficacy within the first year following vaccination. Multiple Phase IIb trials demonstrated early waning of efficacy. The longest duration of protection for RTS,S recorded to date was in a trial of a cohort of 1605 Mozambican children age 1–4 yr at the time of immunization (C1), which showed an overall efficacy against clinical malaria of 30.5% over 43 subsequent months of surveillance. A significant reduction in parasite prevalence in RTS,S vaccinees indicated that the vaccine continued to protect at the end of this period. Although follow-up for recording incident cases of clinical malaria was stopped at 45 months, we were interested in evidence of further durability of protection, and revisited the cohort at 63 months, recording the secondary trial endpoint, prevalence of asexual Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia, in the RTS,S and comparator vaccine groups as a proxy for efficacy. As a comparator, we also visited the contemporaneous cohort of 417 children (C2), which showed waning efficacy after 6 months of follow-up. We also assessed anti-circumsporozoite antibody titers. These results were compared with those of other Phase IIb trials. Prevalence of parasitemia was not significantly lower in the RTS,S/AS02 group compared to comparator groups in C1 (57 [119%] Vs 62 [128%]; p = 0.696) or C2 (30 [226%] Vs 35 [276%]; p = 0.391), despite elevated antibody titers, suggesting that protection did not extend to 5 years after vaccination. This is in contrast to the earlier assessment of parasitemia in C1, where a 34% lower prevalence of parasitemia was observed in the RTS,S/AS02 group at month 45. Comparison with other Phase II trials highlights a complex relationship between efficacy, age and transmission intensity. RTS,S/AS02 provided partial protection from clinical malaria for at least 3.5 years in C1. Duration of protection may depend on environmental circumstances, such as changing malaria transmission, and special attention should be given in the Phase III trial to identifying factors that modify longevity of protection.
    Vaccine 04/2014; 32(19). · 3.49 Impact Factor