Chang S, ran Ma T, Miranda RD, Balestra ME, Mahley RW, Huang YLipid- and receptor-binding regions of apolipoprotein E4 fragments act in concert to cause mitochondrial dysfunction and neurotoxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:18694-18699

Gladstone Institute of Neurological Disease, 1650 Owens Street, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.67). 01/2006; 102(51):18694-9. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0508254102
Source: PubMed


Apolipoprotein (apo) E4, a 299-aa protein and a major risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, can be cleaved to generate C-terminal-truncated fragments that cause neurotoxicity in vitro and neurodegeneration and behavioral deficits in transgenic mice. To investigate this neurotoxicity, we expressed apoE4 with C- or N-terminal truncations or mutations in transfected Neuro-2a cells. ApoE4 (1-272) was neurotoxic, but full-length apoE4(1-299) and apoE4(1-240) were not, suggesting that the lipid-binding region (amino acids 241-272) mediates the neurotoxicity and that amino acids 273-299 are protective. A quadruple mutation in the lipid-binding region (I250A, F257A, W264R, and V269A) abolished the neurotoxicity of apoE4(1-272), and single mutations in the region of amino acids 273-299 (L279Q, K282A, or Q284A) made full-length apoE4 neurotoxic. Immunofluorescence staining showed that apoE4(1-272) formed filamentous inclusions containing phosphorylated tau in some cells and interacted with mitochondria in others, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction as determined by MitoTracker staining and flow cytometry. ApoE4(241-272) did not cause mitochondrial dysfunction or neurotoxicity, suggesting that the lipid-binding region alone is insufficient for neurotoxicity. Truncation of N-terminal sequences (amino acids 1-170) containing the receptor-binding region (amino acids 135-150) and triple mutations within that region (R142A, K146A, and R147A) abolished the mitochondrial interaction and neurotoxicity of apoE4(1-272). Further analysis showed that the receptor-binding region is required for escape from the secretory pathway and that the lipid-binding region mediates mitochondrial interaction. Thus, the lipid- and receptor-binding regions in apoE4 fragments act together to cause mitochondrial dysfunction and neurotoxicity, which may be important in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis.

Download full-text


Available from: Yadong Huang, Oct 22, 2014
  • Source
    • "Finally, the effects of PPARγ activation have been also studied in AD mice model that expressed apolipoprotein (Apo-E4) [64]. Apo-E4 is a major genetic risk factor for AD and exerts neuropathological effects through multiple pathways, including reduction of dendritic spine density and mitochondrial dysfunction [65]. Apo-E4 fragments are neurotoxic and cause neurodegeneration and behavioral deficits in transgenic mice [66]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neuronal processes (neurites and axons) have an important role in brain cells communication and, generally, they are damaged in neurodegenerative diseases. Recent evidence has showed that the activation of PPARγ pathway promoted neuronal differentiation and axon polarity. In addition, activation of PPARγ using thiazolidinediones (TZDs) prevented neurodegeneration by reducing neuronal death, improving mitochondrial function, and decreasing neuroinflammation in neuropathic pain. In this review, we will discuss important evidence that supports a possible role of PPARγ in neuronal development, improvement of neuronal health, and pain signaling. Therefore, activation of PPARγ is a potential target with therapeutic applications against neurodegenerative disorders, brain injury, and pain regulation.
    PPAR Research 08/2014; 2014:768594. DOI:10.1155/2014/768594 · 1.64 Impact Factor
    • "In AD, the APOE ε4 allele is thought to cause mitochondrial dysfunction through altering the interaction capabilities of its encoded protein's lipid-and receptor-binding regions [77]. Genes involved in actin pathways, such as CD2AP (CD2-associated protein), may directly impact mitochondrial fission, fusion, and transport along axons due to the dynamic actin remodeling and stabilization required for these processes [78]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The discovery of causative genetic mutations in affected family members has historically dominated our understanding of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Nevertheless, most cases of neurodegenerative disease are not explained by Mendelian inheritance of known genetic variants, but instead are thought to have a complex etiology with numerous genetic and environmental factors contributing to susceptibility. Although unbiased genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified novel associations to neurodegenerative diseases, most of these hits explain only modest fractions of disease heritability. In addition, despite the substantial overlap of clinical and pathologic features among major neurodegenerative diseases, surprisingly few GWAS-implicated variants appear to exhibit cross-disease association. These realities suggest limitations of the focus on individual genetic variants and create challenges for the development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, which traditionally target an isolated molecule or mechanistic step. Recently, GWAS of complex diseases and traits have focused less on individual susceptibility variants and instead have emphasized the biological pathways and networks revealed by genetic associations. This new paradigm draws on the hypothesis that fundamental disease processes may be influenced on a personalized basis by a combination of variants - some common and others rare, some protective and others deleterious - in key genes and pathways. Here, we review and synthesize the major pathways implicated in neurodegeneration, focusing on GWAS from the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorders, AD and PD. Using literature mining, we also discover a novel regulatory network that is enriched with AD- and PD-associated genes and centered on the SP1 and AP-1 (Jun/Fos) transcription factors. Overall, this pathway- and network-driven model highlights several potential shared mechanisms in AD and PD that will inform future studies of these and other neurodegenerative disorders. These insights also suggest that biomarker and treatment strategies may require simultaneous targeting of multiple components, including some specific to disease stage, in order to assess and modulate neurodegeneration. Pathways and networks will provide ideal vehicles for integrating relevant findings from GWAS and other modalities to enhance clinical translation.
    American Journal of Neurodegenerative Diseases 10/2013; 2(3):145-175.
  • Source
    • "AECE-cleaved apoE4 missing C-terminus residues 272 to 299 (apoE4∆272–299) can translocate from the secretory pathway to the cytosol [23]. The LDL-receptor binding region (residues 136 to 150), which is rich in positively-charged amino acids arginine, lysine, and histidine, is required for escape in Neuro-2a mouse neuroblastoma cultures [23]. An enrichment in positively-charged amino acids is also seen in the protein-translocation domains of certain viral proteins, suggesting a similar mechanism for membrane penetration [23]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: APOE, which encodes apolipoprotein E, is the most prevalent and best established genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Current understanding of Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology posits an important role for apolipoprotein E in the disease cascade via its interplay with β-amyloid. However, evidence is also emerging for roles of apolipoprotein E in the disease process that are independent of β-amyloid. Particular areas of interest are lipid metabolism, tau pathology, neuroenergetics, neurodevelopment, synaptic plasticity, the neurovasculature, and neuroinflammation. The intent of this article is to review the literature in each of these areas.
    Alzheimer's Research and Therapy 09/2013; 5(5):38. DOI:10.1186/alzrt204 · 3.98 Impact Factor
Show more