Article

Cytologic differential diagnosis of follicular lymphoma grades 1 and 2 from reactive follicular hyperplasia: cytologic features of fine-needle aspiration smears with Pap stain and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis to detect t(14;18)(q32;q21) chromosomal translocation.

Department of Pathology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Diagnostic Cytopathology (Impact Factor: 1.52). 01/2006; 34(1):11-7. DOI: 10.1002/dc.20381
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a well-established technique for diagnosis of malignant lymphoma (ML). Generally, Giemsa but not Pap stain is used in FNAC. However, cytologic features obtained from Pap stain are also valuable. Very few studies on the cytologic characteristics of ML, as determined by Pap stain, are available. It is easier to observe nuclear irregularity and to identify nucleoli in ML cells by Pap stain than by Giemsa stain. Here, we applied Pap stain for cytomorphologic differential diagnosis of follicular lymphoma (FL) from reactive follicular hyperplasia (RFH). Eighteen biopsy-confirmed cases of FL grades 1 and 2, with available FNAC smears, and six cases of RFH were selected for this study. Low-power magnification showed well-known features, and tingible body macrophages and lymphoid cell aggregates were observed frequently in RFH and FL, respectively. In addition, the so-called two-nuclei-like cleaved cells were observed frequently in FL. These cells showed notably cleaved nuclei, and therefore, appeared to possess two nuclei. Under high-power magnification, the occurrence of cells with nucleoli >1 microm and of cleaved cells was high in FL compared to RFH. It is believed that FL derives from centrocytes and that FL cells are slightly larger than non-neoplastic small lymphocytes. However, analysis of cell diameter in this study indicated that small lymphoma cells were predominant in half the cases of FL grades 1 and 2, and the percentage of these cells was similar to that in RFH, showing why false-negative diagnosis of FL grades 1 and 2 occasionally occurs. There are limitations of FNAC in the diagnosis of FL. However, we believe that the appearance of two-nuclei-like cleaved cells and the high percentage of nucleoli-possessing cells, which we describe here, provide significant and valuable clues for the differential diagnosis of FL from RFH. Of 18 cases of FL grades 1 and 2, t(14;18)(q32;q21) was found in 13 cases with the use of destained FNAC smears. Our study suggests that, together with the cytomorphologic findings described earlier, FISH analysis for the chromosomal translocation, t(14;18)(q32;q21), is crucial for final cytologic diagnosis of FL grades 1 and 2.

0 Followers
 · 
87 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) has proven to be a rapid, cost-effective, and accurate means for evaluating a wide variety of conditions in most organ systems, although the FNA diagnosis of lymphoma (especially the primary diagnosis) remains controversial. However, recent changes to the World Health Organization classification of lymphomas place more emphasis on cytology and less emphasis on architecture, thus opening the door to a more expanded use of FNA, particularly in non-Hodgkin lymphomas. A review of the literature over the past 10 years reveals sensitivity in the range of 66%–100% and specificity in the range of 58%–100%. The complementary use of cytomorphology, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry has proven more accurate that any single modality alone. Sophisticated techniques once reserved for the research laboratory (ie, FISH and PCR) are now often used in the clinical setting and provide important diagnostic and prognostic information. The evaluation of Hodgkin lymphomas and some large-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas remains problematic and may require tissue core biopsy. We also briefly consider the use of FNA in workup of metastatic tumors in lymph nodes. Rapid and accurate assessment of metastatic disease, particularly carcinomas and melanomas, is readily accomplished by FNA biopsy, with an overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of over 90%. In these cases, cell block material can be obtained to perform various ancillary studies for additional useful prognostic information.
    Pathology Case Reviews 01/2007; 12(1):10-26. DOI:10.1097/01.pcr.0000252857.12872.52
  • Source
    01/2007; 51:123-152. DOI:10.1159/000325707
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is very rare type of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) usually confined to the body cavities such as the pleural space, pericardium, and peritoneum. PEL is a human herpes virus-8 (HHV-8)-associated lymphoma and commonly observed in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. However, HIV-infected patients are extremely fewer in Japan in comparison with those in Western countries; PEL is usually not associated with HIV infection in Japan. This report presents seven Japanese cases of PEL. In situ hybridization revealed that the PEL cells were negative for EBV in all cases. An immunocytological analysis showed that only one case was positive for HHV-8, and PEL cells were positive for CD20 in all cases. MUM1 was positive, but CD10 and CD138 were negative in six cases. One case each was positive for CD30 and BCL-6. The phenotypic patterns of HIV-related is BCL6-/MUM1+/CD138+, thus, the phenotypic findings observed by immunocytochemistry in this study were somehow different from those reported in Western countries. However, the cytomorphological features of PEL cells showed large cell size, abundant basophilic cytoplasm, coarse chromatin, and occasional binucleated or multinucleated cells, similar to a large cell immunoblastic and anaplastic large cell lymphoma, indicating that the cytomorphological characteristics of PE cells in Giemsa and Papanicolaou stain were consistent with those reported abroad. The prognosis for PEL in these cases was poor, but the survival time was variable ranging from 1 month to 54 months, and was different from that of Western cases. No p16/CDKN2A expression was observed, and one case showed PEL cells with a BLIMP1 mutation.
    Diagnostic Cytopathology 04/2009; 37(4):293-8. DOI:10.1002/dc.21022 · 1.52 Impact Factor