Article

Inadequacies of the current American Joint Committee on cancer staging system for prostate cancer.

Department of Medical Informatics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Cancer (Impact Factor: 5.2). 03/2006; 106(3):559-65. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21605
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Two major objectives of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system are to ensure appropriate treatments for patients and to determine prognosis. AJCC stage for distant prostate cancer includes patients with regional lymph node involvement. In the current study, the authors assessed whether patients with lymph node involvement and patients with distant metastasis, as determined using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) staging system, had similar treatment and survival duration and, thus, were grouped together appropriately in the AJCC system.
In total, 4141 patients were selected from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center's Tumor Registry who initially had registered at the center between January 1, 1982, and December 31, 2001, with a diagnosis of prostate cancer; had received no treatment before presentation; and had received treatment at the center. Patients with unknown stage and patients with any other primary malignancies were excluded. Descriptive analyses of demographic and disease variables were performed. Using SEER stage groups, survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed.
Treatments differed between patients with lymph node involvement and patients with distant metastasis. The median survival was 134 months for patients with lymph node involvement and 42 months for patients with distant metastasis. When these 2 groups were combined, as in the AJCC scheme, the median survival was 86 months.
The treatment and median survival of patients with lymph node involvement differed substantially from those of patients with distant metastasis. The current AJCC scheme for prostate cancer appeared to be inappropriate when considering its purpose, and the authors concluded that it should be revised.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
63 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous studies have shown that the positive detection rate of [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) depends on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) plasma levels. This study compared PSA levels and PSA doubling time (PSADT) to predict [(11)C]choline PET/CT findings. PSADT was retrospectively calculated in 170 prostate cancer (PCa) patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy who underwent [(11)C]choline PET/CT. PSADT was calculated as PSADT = ln2/m, where m is the slope of the linear regression line of the natural log of PSA values. At least three PSA measurements were used (median: 4; range: 3-16), separated by at least 3 months, each with a minimum increase of 0.20 ng/ml. PET/CT findings were validated using criteria based on histological analysis and clinical and imaging data. Statistical analysis was performed using the t test, chi-square test, analysis of variance and binary logistic regression. Regression-based coefficients were used to develop a nomogram predicting the probability of positive [(11)C]choline PET/CT and 200 bootstrap resamples were used for internal validation. The median PSA was 1.25 ng/ml (range: 0.23-48.6 ng/ml), and the median PSADT was 7.0 months (range: 0.97-45.3 months). [(11)C]choline PET/CT was positive in 75 of 170 patients (44%). PET/CT findings were validated using histological criteria (11%) and clinical and imaging criteria (89%). The overall accuracy of [(11)C]choline PET/CT was 88%. Multivariate logistic regression showed that high PSA and short PSADT were significant (p < 0.05) predictors of positive [(11)C]choline PET/CT [PSA: odds ratio (OR) = 1.43; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-1.78; PSADT: OR = 1.12; 95% CI: 1.04-1.21]. The percentage of patients with positive [(11)C]choline PET/CT was 27% for PSADT >6 months, 61% for PSADT between 3 and 6 months and 81% for PSADT <3 months. The percentage of patients who displayed pathological [(11)C]choline uptake in the skeleton significantly increased (p < 0.05) from 3% for PSADT >6 months to 52% for PSADT <3 months. Conversely, patients who displayed pathological [(11)C]choline uptake in the prostatectomy bed were 0% for PSADT <3 months and 17% for PSADT >6 months (p < 0.05). A nomogram based on age, PSA, PSADT, time to trigger PSA, Gleason score, pathological stage and androgen deprivation therapy demonstrated bootstrap-corrected predictive accuracy of 81%. Like PSA, PSADT is an independent predictor of [(11)C]choline PET/CT. [(11)C]choline PET/CT is very sensitive to PCa tumour growth, as reflected by PSA kinetics. PSADT should be taken into account by physicians when referring PCa patients for [(11)C]choline PET/CT.
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine 03/2010; 37(6):1106-16. · 4.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: The effectiveness of salvage therapy in prostate cancer is greater for low prostate specific antigen values. Therefore, early detection of tumor recurrence is warranted. [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography has the potential of early restaging of prostate cancer with low prostate specific antigen, but the selection of patients at high risk for positive [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography is desirable to optimize salvage therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 75 patients with prostate cancer with an increasing prostate specific antigen less than 1.5 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy who never received antiandrogen deprivation therapy or salvage radiotherapy who underwent [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for the restaging of disease. Binary logistic regression was used to assess predictive factors of positive [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography. Included variables were trigger prostate specific antigen, prostate specific antigen doubling time, age, pathological stage and Gleason score. RESULTS: Median prostate specific antigen was 0.61 ng/ml. [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography was positive in 16 of 75 patients (21%). On univariate analysis prostate specific antigen doubling time less than 6 months was the only factor significantly associated with an increased risk of positive [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (OR 7.77, 95% CI 2.34-25.80, p = 0.001). In patients with prostate specific antigen doubling time less than 6 months, the positive detection rate of [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography increased to 50%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with prostate cancer with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and prostate specific antigen less than 1.5 ng/ml, prostate specific antigen doubling time less than 6 months predicts positive [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography. In these patients [(11)C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography may reduce by 50% the number in whom salvage therapy is initiated empirically without knowing the disease location.
    The Journal of urology 11/2012; · 3.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the prostate specific antigen era most prostate cancer presents at an early stage. However, a significant number of patients have advanced disease, including those with stage IV disease. Assignment to stage IV prostate cancer may occur by different modes, namely as T4N0M0 vs N1 vs M1 disease. We hypothesize that patients with clinical T4 disease have better outcomes than those with N1 or M1 disease. A total of 17 SEER registries were queried from 1995 through 2003. Multivariate and univariate analyses examined overall survival and prostate cancer specific survival across subcategories of stage IV disease while controlling for various patient and disease related characteristics. There were 615 patients with cT4N0M0 disease, 3,189 with TxN1M0 and 10,893 with TxNxM1 who met the study inclusion criteria. Survival differences were observed between cT4N0M0 and M1 cancer, between N1 and M1 disease, and were most pronounced in younger patients (age 50 years or younger), gradually narrowing with increasing patient age. Factors that demonstrated significant association with poor survival included higher tumor grade, unknown tumor grade and absence of a spouse. Staging systems based on American Joint Committee on Cancer/TNM staging enables the grouping of patients into homogenous categories for treatment selection and prognostication. However, our data suggest that not all stage IV prostate cancers behave similarly. The difference in survival among locally advanced (T4), node positive and distantly metastatic stage IV prostate cancer appears to be dependent on patient age.
    The Journal of urology 08/2010; 184(2):512-8. · 3.75 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
2 Downloads
Available from
Oct 3, 2014