Article

Arthroscopic glenoid resurfacing with meniscal allograft: a minimally invasive alternative for treating glenohumeral arthritis.

Orthopaedic Surgeons of Wisconsin, Franklin, Wisconsin 53132, USA.
Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.1). 01/2006; 21(12):1517-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.10.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The chronically painful arthritic glenohumeral joint recalcitrant to nonsurgical treatment modalities generally has been treated with an open arthroplasty type of procedure. Certain patients may benefit from a less invasive surgical technique in which a meniscal allograft is used to resurface the glenoid, resulting in decreased pain and increased function. We describe an arthroscopic method of glenoid resurfacing with a meniscal allograft to aid in the restoration of function by providing pain relief to patients debilitated by arthritic conditions of the glenohumeral joint.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
41 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Glenohumeral arthritis in the athlete can be managed nonsurgically with medications, injections, physical therapy, and modification of activity. When surgical intervention is warranted, the patient is more definitively served with open resurfacing or replacement procedures. However, arthroscopy can be used as an intervening step to mitigate symptoms of glenohumeral arthritis. Arthroscopic interventions include glenohumeral debridement of delaminating articular surfaces, debridement of displaced degenerative labral tears, removal of osteocartilaginous or foreign bodies, and capsular release. These procedures address the pain, mechanical locking, or loss of motion associated with glenohumeral arthritis.
    Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine - OPERAT TECHNIQ SPORTS MED. 01/2008; 16(1):9-13.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As allogeneic musculoskeletal tissue is readily available, has minimal limitation in size or shape, and carries no donor site morbidity, it has become attractive for use in reconstructive shoulder surgery. Allograft is a viable option for treating osseous defects associated with glenohumeral instability and has been shown to achieve a stable shoulder with good clinical outcomes. Although there are mixed results on the use of allograft as rotator cuff augments or substitutes, new commercially processed materials such as GraftJacket are being tested to address the high failure rates associated with massive rotator cuff repair. Interposition arthroplasty as a treatment for glenohumeral arthritis in the young and active patient is a novel concept in which the arthritic glenoid is biologically resurfaced. Satisfactory results have been described using lateral meniscus and Achilles tendon allograft. Despite the promising reports on the use of allograft in reconstructive shoulder surgery, most of the published literature exists as retrospective, case reports. Additional large, controlled research is needed to prove the efficacy and safety of allograft tissue in the treatment of athletic injuries of the shoulder.
    Sports medicine and arthroscopy review 10/2007; 15(3):149-57. · 1.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report a retrospective review of surface replacement hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder with biologic resurfacing of the glenoid, for relatively young patients suffering from advanced glenohumeral arthritis. It was hoped that the resurfacing fascia would prevent glenoid erosion for a period of time. This surgery was performed by two surgeons between 1996 and 2005. The indications for the arthroplasty were severe pain and limitation of function, in relatively young patients with advanced glenohumeral arthritis but an intact rotator cuff. Eighteen shoulders, with an average follow-up of 4.8 years (range 2-10.6), were available for assessment. The average age was 54.8 years. Postoperative Constant-Murley Score averaged 71.4 points; the mean sex- and age-adjusted Constant Score was 83.9%. The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 74.4 points. Average active forward elevation was 130 degrees. Eighty three percent of the patients were satisfied with the long-term result. Radiographic follow-up demonstrated that none of the prostheses was loose; however moderate to severe glenoid erosion was present in 56% of shoulders. We conclude that this procedure is useful in the treatment of younger patients suffering from advanced glenohumeral arthritis of the shoulder; however the interposed anterior capsule did not protect the glenoid from mid-term erosion by the humeral prosthesis. Level IV, retrospective case series.
    Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.] 04/2009; 18(6):915-9. · 1.93 Impact Factor