Effects of sleep deprivation on auditory and visual memory tasks.
ABSTRACT Probe recognition tasks have shown the effects of sleep deprivation following a full night of sleep loss. The current study investigated shorter durations of deprivation by testing 11 subjects for accuracy and response time every 2 hr. from 10 p.m. through 8 a.m. We replicated Elkin and Murray's auditory single-probe recognition task using the number triplets and added two visual tasks with number and shape triplets. Series of six stimuli were each followed by a probe, which was presented after 2.5 sec. as a short delay or 20 sec. as a long delay. Accuracy performance showed a significant decrease for the long delay beginning after 4 a.m. for the two visual tasks. Response times were significantly slower for the visual shapes task using the short delay. Visual tasks, especially shapes, may be more prone to disruption by sleep deprivation, given the visual information load and the briefness of iconic memory.
- SourceAvailable from: Veronica B Perez[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Sleep deprivation has adverse consequences for a variety of cognitive functions. The exact effects of sleep deprivation, though, are dependent upon the cognitive process examined. Within working memory, for example, some component processes are more vulnerable to sleep deprivation than others. Additionally, the differential impacts on cognition of different types of sleep deprivation have not been well studied. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of one night of total sleep deprivation and 4 nights of partial sleep deprivation (4 hours in bed/night) on two components of visual working memory: capacity and filtering efficiency. Forty-four healthy young adults were randomly assigned to one of the two sleep deprivation conditions. All participants were studied: 1) in a well-rested condition (following 6 nights of 9 hours in bed/night); and 2) following sleep deprivation, in a counter-balanced order. Visual working memory testing consisted of two related tasks. The first measured visual working memory capacity and the second measured the ability to ignore distractor stimuli in a visual scene (filtering efficiency). Results showed neither type of sleep deprivation reduced visual working memory capacity. Partial sleep deprivation also generally did not change filtering efficiency. Total sleep deprivation, on the other hand, did impair performance in the filtering task. These results suggest components of visual working memory are differentially vulnerable to the effects of sleep deprivation, and different types of sleep deprivation impact visual working memory to different degrees. Such findings have implications for operational settings where individuals may need to perform with inadequate sleep and whose jobs involve receiving an array of visual information and discriminating the relevant from the irrelevant prior to making decisions or taking actions (e.g., baggage screeners, air traffic controllers, military personnel, health care providers).PLoS ONE 01/2012; 7(4):e35653. · 3.73 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Two Independent Sources of Short Term Memory Problems During Sleep Deprivation: A commentary on Wee et al. Sleep deprivation accelerates delay-related loss of visual short-term memories without affecting precision. Adrienne M. Tucker, Ph.D. Research Institute Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Accidents related to sleep loss are estimated to cost billions of dollars annually,1 yet the effects of sleep deprivation (SD) on aspects of cognition have yet to be unraveled. For example, short term memory (STM) plays a vital role in the performance of a wide range of tasks such as decision making and problem solving.2 During sleep loss, STM performance is slower and less accurate with large individual differences in the magnitude of impairment3-8 yet the underlying mechanism(s) for these performance changes are not clear. In this issue of SLEEP, Wee and colleagues9 take a model-based approach to understanding cognitive performance by fitting quantitative mathematical parameters which are theorized to reflect latent cognitive processes. Theoretically, this approach allows one to disentangle the multitude cognitive processes contributing to a single behavioral output variable such as reaction time (RT) or accuracy.10 Another way to isolate cognitive processes is via parametric manipulations, which place increasingly greater difficulty on a given process of interest (such as a requirement to remember 1, 3, or 6 letters).11 These approaches allow more specific conclusions to be drawn and can help pinpoint which of the following processes underlie the STM deficits seen during SD: memory encoding, memory maintenance, memory retrieval and/or a more general deficit in basic perceptual and attentional processing. Below I summarize what is known about the effects of SD on these specific processes from the study by Wee and colleagues9, as well as previous approaches involving cognitive modeling, parametric task manipulation, and neuroimaging. Memory Maintenance: Wee et al.9 tested 19 healthy young participants twice in a counterbalanced order, once after sleep and once after a night of SD. Three colored squares were presented and at a delay of either 1 or 10s; subjects were cued to retrieve the square presented at the identified location by selecting the matching color from a wheel including 180 choices. Bayes’ probabilistic model was used to separate the response error distribution into three parts: one representing precision of target items, one representing distractor items, and one representing random guesses. The model parameter reflecting random guesses increased as a function of SD and delay, which suggests that participants were more likely to drop items from STM during sleep loss (i.e., that participants had a harder time maintaining items in STM). Intriguingly, two studies using a parametric approach have also reported selective deficits in working memory maintenance in SD, as well as one other model-based analysis described further below.12-14 In this issue of SLEEP, Wee et al. also found that SD subjects were more likely to erroneously report a non-target item.9 SD did not affect the model parameter reflecting the precision of remembered items, however, which suggests that encoding quality is not impacted for those items that are successfully maintained. Memory Encoding: Rakitin et al. investigated the effects of 48h SD on a letter recognition task where the difficulty of encoding the probe was manipulated by randomly scrambling either 0%, 25%, or 50% of the image’s pixels.15 Contrary to prediction, there was no interaction between SD and degradation. In line with the result reported by Wee et al.9, this suggests that stimulus encoding is not primarily responsible for the working memory deficits seen. Memory Retrieval: In other studies, the difficulty of memory retrieval was manipulated by using memory set sizes of one, three, or six letters. After two nights of sleep loss there was no interaction between SD and memory set size on either RT or accuracy suggesting that working memory retrieval was not impaired.16 Another study used a similar task, also after two nights of sleep loss. In this task the memory probes were manipulated such that 50% that were not in the current set were in the set previous; this recency places an additional proactive interference demand on retrieval. Again, there were no interactions between SD and set size nor between SD and recency, providing even stronger evidence that memory retrieval is not greatly impacted by sleep loss.17 Basic perceptual and attention processing: Converging evidence suggests that decrements in basic perceptual and attention processing contribute to STM impairment during SD. First, sleep-deprived subjects show failures to respond on STM tasks similar to the attentional lapses seen in the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT)18-23 Second, more complex STM tasks which are more attentionally engaging – and thus put lesser demands on endogenous attentional control – are better preserved during sleep loss.24-26 Third, SD participants have a harder time maintaining attention in the face of distracting items presented during working memory tasks.27-28 Finally, some brain regions (e.g., occipital and parietal cortex) identified in neuroimaging studies implicate deficits in basic perceptual and attentional processing.7, 29-33 Notably, after 53-57h of SD, rTMS to facilitate left upper middle occipital cortex in BA19 (a region involved in perceptual processing) was shown to significantly decrease RT on a delayed letter recognition task.34 That is, facilitating a brain region involved in perceptual processing was able to at least partially restore performance, suggesting that perceptual processing deficits underlie some of the STM impairment seen during SD. Later this finding was replicated.35 Two sources of STM impairment: Intriguingly, two independent sets of neural correlates of working memory impairment during SD have been dissociated.36 Further, basic attentional versus working memory maintenance deficits have been dissociated using computational modeling.14 The effects of SD on STM were investigated using a letter string recognition task across lags of 0-4 trials. A computational model based on Atkinson was used to estimate three parameters representing attention, working memory span, and encoding. In line with the report by Wee et al.9, SD significantly reduced attention and working memory span parameters, but it did not reduce the encoding parameter. Specifically, SD reduced working memory span by 38%--a large effect (ƞ2=0.21). This was reflected in a significantly greater drop in accuracy with lag (or delay), reflecting trouble maintaining items in working memory span. The effect on attention was slightly more than half that of working memory span (ƞ2=0.13) and the change in these two parameters was not correlated with each other. Indeed, individual differences in the profile of cognitive impairment were of such a degree that some individuals were selectively vulnerable to attention decrements while others were selectively vulnerable to working memory span decrements. Summary: Behavioral, cognitive modeling, and neuroimaging results converge to suggest that deficits in short term memory during sleep deprivation arise from decrements in basic attentional and perceptual processing as well as decrements in memory maintenance, while memory encoding and retrieval processes seem to be relatively spared. Thus, the study by Wee et al.9 adds further evidence to the conclusion that there are at least two independent ways that short term memory deficits can occur during sleep deprivation: one related to basic attention and perceptual processing; and the other related to memory maintenance. Individuals can experience deficits in one or both processes when sleep deprived. More studies that use quantitative modeling as reported by Wee et al.9 can help provide a greater understanding of the underlying mechanisms responsible for the effects of sleep loss on STM. REFERENCES 1. Dinges DF. An overview of sleepiness and accidents. J Sleep Res 1995;4:4-14. 2. Baddeley AD & Hitch GJ. Working memory. Psychol Learn Motiv 1974;8:47-89. 3. Frey DJ, Badia P, & Wright KP. Inter‐and intra‐individual variability in performance near the circadian nadir during sleep deprivation. J Sleep Res 2004;13:305-315. 4. Van Dongen HPA, Baynard MD, Maislin G & Dinges DF. Systematic interindividual differences in neurobehavioral impairment from sleep loss: evidence of trait-like differential vulnerability. Sleep 2004;27:423-433. 5. Caldwell JA, Mu Q, Smith JK, Mishory A, Caldwell JL, Peters G, Brown DL & George MS. Are individual differences in fatigue vulnerability related to baseline differences in cortical activation? Behav Neurosci 2005;119:694-707. 6. Mu Q, Mishory A, Johnson KA, Nahas Z, Kozel FA, Yamanaka K, Bohning DE & George MS. Decreased brain activation during a working memory task at rested baseline is associated with vulnerability to sleep deprivation. Sleep 2005;28:433-446. 7. Lim J, Choo WC & Chee MWL. Reproducibility of changes in behaviour and fMRI activation associated with sleep deprivation in a working memory task. Sleep 2007;30:61-70. 8. Rupp TL, Wesensten NJ & Balkin TJ. Trait-like vulnerability to total and partial sleep loss. Sleep 2012;35:1163-1172. 9. Wee N, Asplund CL & Chee MWL. Sleep deprivation accelerates delay-related loss of visual short-term memories without affecting precision. Sleep 2013;36. 10. Forstmann BU, Wagenmakers EJ, Eichele T, Brown S & Serences JT. Reciprocal relations between cognitive neuroscience and formal cognitive models: opposites attract? Trends Cogn Sci 2011;15:272-279. 11. Sternberg S. Memory-scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. Am Sci 1969;57:421-457. 12. Elkin AJ & Murray DJ. The effects of sleep loss on short-term recognition memory. Can J Psychol 1974;28:192-198. 13. Raidy DJ, & Scharff LFV. Effects of sleep deprivation on auditory and visual memory tasks. Percept Motor Skill 2005;101:451-467. 14. Turner TH, Drummond S, Salamat JS & Brown GG. Effects of 42 hr of total sleep deprivation on component processes of verbal working memory. Neuropsychology 2007;21:787-795. 15. Rakitin BC, Tucker AM, Basner RC & Stern Y. The Effects of Stimulus Degradation after 48 Hours of Total Sleep Deprivation. Sleep 2012;35:113-121. 16. Tucker AM, Stern Y, Basner RC & Rakitin BC. The prefrontal model revisited: double dissociations between young sleep deprived and elderly subjects on cognitive components of performance. Sleep 2011;34:1039-1050. 17. Tucker AM, Whitney P, Belenky G, Hinson JM & Van Dongen HP. Effects of sleep deprivation on dissociated components of executive functioning. Sleep 2010;33:47-57. 18. Basner M & Dinges DF. Maximizing sensitivity of the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) to sleep loss. Sleep 2011;34:581-591. 19. Dorrian J, Rogers N & Dinges DF. Psychomotor vigilance performance: Neurocognitive assay sensitive to sleep loss. In Kushida CA, ed. Sleep deprivation: clinical issues, pharmacology and sleep loss effects. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2005:39-70. 20. Chee MW & Choo WC. Functional imaging of working memory after 24 hr of total sleep deprivation. J Neurosci 2004;24:4560-4567. 21. Chuah LY & Chee MW. Cholinergic augmentation modulates visual task performance in sleep-deprived young adults. J Neurosci 2008;28:11369-11377. 22. Chuah LY, Chong DL, Chen AK, Rekshan III WR, Tan JC, Zheng H & Chee MW. Donepezil improves episodic memory in young individuals vulnerable to the effects of sleep deprivation. Sleep 2009;32:999-1010. 23. Tucker AM, Rakitin BC, Basner RC, Gazes Y, Steffener J & Stern Y. fMRI activation during failures to respond key to understanding performance changes with sleep deprivation. Behav Brain Res 2011;218:73-79. 24. Drummond, S. P., Brown, G. G., Gillin, J. C., Stricker, J. L., Wong, E. C., & Buxton, R. B. Altered brain response to verbal learning following sleep deprivation. Nature 2000;403:655-657. 25. Chee MW & Choo WC. Functional imaging of working memory after 24 hr of total sleep deprivation. J Neurosci 2004;24:4560-4567. 26. Drummond S, Meloy MJ, Yanagi MA, Orff HJ & Brown GG. Compensatory recruitment after sleep deprivation and the relationship with performance. Psychiat Res-Neuroim 2005;140: 211-223. 27. Chuah LY, Dolcos F, Chen AK, Zheng H, Parimal S & Chee MW. Sleep deprivation and interference by emotional distracters. Sleep 2010;33:1305-1313. 28. Drummond SP, Anderson DE, Straus LD, Vogel EK & Perez VB. The Effects of Two Types of Sleep Deprivation on Visual Working Memory Capacity and Filtering Efficiency. PloS one 2012;7:e35653. 29. Bell-McGinty S, Habeck C, Hilton HJ, Rakitin B, Scarmeas N, Zarahn E, Flynn J, DeLaPaz R, Basner R & Stern Y. Identification and differential vulnerability of a neural network in sleep deprivation. Cereb Cortex 2004;14:496-502. 30. Habeck C, Rakitin BC, Moeller J, Scarmeas N, Zarahn E, Brown T. & Stern, Y. An event-related fMRI study of the neurobehavioral impact of sleep deprivation on performance of a delayed-match-to-sample task. Cognitive Brain Res 2004;18:306-321. 31. Mu Q, Nahas Z, Johnson KA, Yamanaka K, Mishory A, Koola J, Hill S, Horner MD, Bohning DE & George MS. Decreased cortical response to verbal working memory following sleep deprivation. Sleep 2005;28:55-67. 32. Chee MW, Chuah LY, Venkatraman V, Chan WY, Philip P & Dinges DF. Functional imaging of working memory following normal sleep and after 24 and 35 h of sleep deprivation: Correlations of fronto-parietal activation with performance. Neuroimage 2006;31:419-428. 33. Chee MW & Chuah YL. Functional neuroimaging and behavioral correlates of capacity decline in visual short-term memory after sleep deprivation. P Natl Acad Sci 2007;104:9487-9492. 34. Luber B, Stanford AD, Bulow P, Nguyen T, Rakitin BC, Habeck C, Basner R, Stern Y. & Lisanby S.H. Remediation of Sleep-Deprivation–Induced Working Memory Impairment with fMRI-Guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Cereb Cortex 2008;18: 2077-2085. 35. Luber B, Stanford AD, Tucker A, Nguyen T, Rakitin BC, Habeck C, Basner R, Stern Y. & Lisanby SH. fMRI-guided rTMS in the remediation of sleep deprivation-induced performance deficits in a working memory task. Sleep In Press. 36. Choo WC, Lee WW, Venkatraman V, Sheu FS & Chee MW. Dissociation of cortical regions modulated by both working memory load and sleep deprivation and by sleep deprivation alone. Neuroimage 2005;25:579-587.Sleep 01/2013; 36(6):815-7. · 5.10 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Visual short-term memory (VSTM) is an important measure of information processing capacity and supports many higher-order cognitive processes. We examined how sleep deprivation (SD) and maintenance duration interact to influence the number and precision of items in VSTM using an experimental design that limits the contribution of lapses at encoding. For each trial, participants attempted to maintain the location and color of three stimuli over a delay. After a retention interval of either 1 or 10 seconds, participants reported the color of the item at the cued location by selecting it on a color wheel. The probability of reporting the probed item, the precision of report, and the probability of reporting a nonprobed item were determined using a mixture-modeling analysis. Participants were studied twice in counterbalanced order, once after a night of normal sleep and once following a night of sleep deprivation. Sleep laboratory. Nineteen healthy college age volunteers (seven females) with regular sleep patterns. Approximately 24 hours of total SD. SD selectively reduced the number of integrated representations that can be retrieved after a delay, while leaving the precision of object information in the stored representations intact. Delay interacted with SD to lower the rate of successful recall. Visual short-term memory is compromised during sleep deprivation, an effect compounded by delay. However, when memories are retrieved, they tend to be intact. CITATION: Wee N; Asplund CL; Chee MWL. Sleep deprivation accelerates delay-related loss of visual short-term memories without affecting precision. SLEEP 2013;36(6):849-856.Sleep 01/2013; 36(6):849-56. · 5.10 Impact Factor