High rates of acute stress disorder impact quality-of-life outcomes in injured adolescents: mechanism and gender predict acute stress disorder risk.

Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California 92103-8896, USA.
The Journal of trauma (Impact Factor: 2.96). 11/2005; 59(5):1126-30. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196433.61423.f2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Injury is the leading cause of death and functional disability in adolescent children. Little is known about quality of life and psychological outcomes after trauma in adolescents. The Trauma Recovery Project in Adolescents is a prospective epidemiologic study designed to examine multiple outcomes after major trauma in adolescents aged 12 to 19 years, including quality of life (QoL) and psychological sequelae such as acute stress disorder (ASD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The specific objectives of the present report are to examine ASD rates and the association of ASD with QoL outcomes in injured adolescents.
Between April 26, 1999, and November 13, 2002, 401 eligible trauma patients aged 12 to 19 years triaged to five participating trauma center hospitals in a regionalized trauma system were enrolled in the study. The admission criteria for patients were as follows: (1) age 12 to 19 years and (2) injury diagnoses excluding severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) or spinal cord injury. QoL after trauma was measured using the Quality of Well-being (QWB) scale, a sensitive and well-validated functional index (range, 0 = death to 1.000 = optimum functioning). ASD (before discharge) was diagnosed with the Impact of Events Scale-Revised. Scores of 24+ were used to diagnose ASD. Patient outcomes were assessed at discharge and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after discharge.
ASD before discharge was diagnosed in 40% of adolescent trauma survivors. ASD status was associated with large QoL deficits during follow-up, as follows: 3-month, ASD-positive QWB score = 0.667 vs. ASD-negative QWB score = 0.710, p < 0.01; 6-month, ASD-positive QWB score = 0.704 vs. ASD-negative QWB score = 0.742, p < 0.001; 12-month: ASD-positive QWB score = 0.718 vs. ASD-negative QWB score = 0.757, p < 0.01; 24-month, ASD-positive QWB score = 0.725 vs. ASD-negative QWB score = 0.769, p < 0.01. Female sex and violent mechanism predicted ASD risk (47% female vs. 36% male; odds ratio, 1.6; p < 0.05; violence 54% vs. 38%; odds ratio, 1.9; p < 0.01).
Adolescent trauma survivors have high rates of ASD. ASD severely impacts QoL outcomes and is associated with female sex and mechanism of injury in adolescents. Early recognition and treatment of ASD in seriously injured adolescents will improve QoL outcomes.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: IMPORTANCE Violence and injury risk behaviors, alcohol and drug use problems, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depressive symptoms occur frequently among adolescents presenting to acute care medical settings after traumatic physical injury. OBJECTIVE To test the effectiveness of a stepped collaborative care intervention targeting this constellation of risk behaviors and symptoms in randomly sampled hospitalized adolescents with and without traumatic brain injury. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A pragmatic randomized clinical trial was conducted at a single US level I trauma center. Participants included 120 adolescents aged 12 to 18 years randomized to intervention (n = 59) and control (n = 61) conditions. INTERVENTIONS Stepped collaborative care intervention included motivational interviewing elements targeting risk behaviors and substance use as well as medication and cognitive behavioral therapy elements targeting PTSD and depressive symptoms. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Adolescents were assessed at baseline before randomization and 2, 5, and 12 months after injury hospitalization. Standardized instruments were used to assess violence risk behaviors, alcohol and drug use, and PTSD and depressive symptoms. RESULTS The investigation attained more than 95% adolescent follow-up at each assessment point. At baseline, approximately one-third of the participants endorsed the violence risk behavior of carrying a weapon. Regression analyses demonstrated that intervention patients experienced significant reductions in weapon carrying compared with controls during the year after injury (group × time effect, F3,344 = 3.0; P = .03). At 12 months after the injury, 4 (7.3%) intervention patients vs 13 (21.3%) control patients reported currently carrying a weapon (relative risk, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11-0.90). The intervention was equally effective in reducing the risk of weapon carrying among injured adolescents with and without traumatic brain injury. Other treatment targets, including alcohol and drug use problems and high levels of PTSD and depressive symptoms, occurred less frequently in the cohort relative to weapon carrying and were not significantly affected by the intervention. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Collaborative care intervention reduced the risk of adolescent weapon carrying during the year after the injury hospitalization. Future investigation should replicate this preliminary observation. If the finding is replicated, orchestrated investigative and policy efforts could systematically implement and evaluate screening and intervention procedures targeting youth violence prevention at US trauma centers. TRIAL REGISTRATION identifier: NCT00619255.
    JAMA pediatrics. 04/2014; 168(6):1-8.
  • Trauma und Berufskrankheit 01/2008; 10:99-106.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It has been shown that rates of ambulatory follow-up after traumatic injury are not optimal, but the association with insurance status has not been studied.
    Journal of Emergencies Trauma and Shock 10/2014; 7(4):256-60.