Prevalence of negative chest radiography results in the emergency department patient with decompensated heart failure.

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
Annals of emergency medicine (Impact Factor: 4.23). 02/2006; 47(1):13-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.04.003
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although chest radiography is quick and inexpensive, previous research suggests that it is often misleading in emergency department (ED) patients with decompensated heart failure, resulting in misdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment. This study determines the rate of negative chest radiography results in patients found to have disease and the potential contribution of negative findings to a diagnosis discordant with heart failure by an emergency physician.
We used data from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE), a registry of patients with a primary hospital discharge diagnosis of heart failure. We compared initial ED admitting diagnosis to the criterion standard of a hospital discharge diagnosis of heart failure and related these to radiographic findings of heart failure (interstitial edema, pulmonary edema, or vascular congestion, as determined by a staff radiologist) for patients first treated in the ED. The proportion of patients with a non-heart failure ED diagnosis and the diagnostic sensitivity of radiographic findings of heart failure are calculated.
There were 85,376 patients with chest radiograph results and an ED admitting diagnosis. Overall, there were 15,937 patients with no signs of congestion on ED chest radiography, giving a negative rate of 18.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.4% to 18.9%). The proportion of patients with an ED non-heart failure admitting diagnosis was higher in patients with a negative chest radiograph result (23.3%; 95% CI 22.6% to 23.9%) than in patients with a positive chest radiograph result (13.0%; 95% CI 12.7% to 13.2%).
Approximately 1 of every 5 patients admitted from the ED with acute decompensated heart failure had no signs of congestion on chest radiography. Patients lacking signs of congestion on ED chest radiography were more likely to have an ED non-heart failure diagnosis than patients with signs of congestion. Clinicians should not rule out heart failure in patients with no radiographic signs of congestion.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Heart failure (HF) has proven to be a major burden on the health system. The continuing prevalence of the condition and its rising associated costs and care, has amplified the need for earlier diagnosis, better risk stratification and cost-effective treatment to cut rates of hospitalization. Biomarkers seem poised to undertake such tasks, with biomarker management of patients with HF quickly evolving over the past several years. Biomarker guided diagnosis and treatment has become vital, especially during the acute setting in which the majority of patients with HF, were initially present. An adequate assessment of risk requires a multi-marker approach to a given HF patient. Established markers including brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and NT-proBNP are a significant clinical aid to physicians, though their utility is limited. In the past few years, momentous effort has been put into the discovery of new biomarkers. These endeavors have led to the emergence of several capable and promising biomarkers for HF management including troponins, mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), GDF-15, C-reactive protein (CRP), Galectin-3 (Gal-3), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), ST-2, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), copeptin and procalcitonin (PCT). This review will offer an insight into the novel biomarkers considered as the cutting-edge in the diagnosis and management of HF.
    Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy 08/2013;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lung ultrasound (LUS) represents a novel, noninvasive method in the assessment of extravascular lung water. We investigated the utility of LUS in ambulatory subjects with dyspnea or prior heart failure (HF). We studied 81 ambulatory subjects with HF history or dyspnea who underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with LUS of 8 zones. Subjects with heart transplantation or pulmonary conditions known to interfere with LUS were excluded. A reviewer blinded to the clinical data performed echocardiographic measurements and quantified B-lines (reverberation artifacts arising from the pleural line). Of 81 subjects, 74 (91%) (median age 66 years, 39% men, median left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 54%, 39% with prior HF) had adequate LUS images of all 8 zones and were included in the analysis. The number of B-lines ranged from 0-12 (median 2). Increased B-lines, analyzed by tertiles, were associated with larger left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic (P = 0.036) and end-systolic diameters (P = 0.026), septal wall thickness (P = 0.009), LV mass index (P = 0.001), left atrial (LA) volume index (P = 0.005), tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity (P = 0.005) and estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) (P = 0.003). In a secondary analysis associations between B-lines (not grouped by tertiles) and LV mass index, LA volume index, TR velocity and PASP remained stable after adjustment for age, gender, BMI and HF history. Sonographic B-lines from LUS are related to measures of LV and LA structure and right ventricular pressure in ambulatory patients with dyspnea or prior HF. The added clinical and prognostic utility of this imaging modality in ambulatory patients warrants further investigation.
    Echocardiography 09/2013; · 1.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dyspnea is one of the most frequent complaints in the Emergency Department. Thoracic ultrasound should help to differentiate cardiogenic from non-cardiogenic causes of dyspnea. We evaluated whether the diagnostic accuracy can be improved by adding a point-of-care-ultrasonography (POC-US) to routine exams and if an early use of this technique produces any advantage.
    Critical ultrasound journal 01/2014; 6(1):5.


Available from