Prison medicine: Ethics and equivalence

Senior Lecturer in Forensic Psychiatry, University of Southampton, Ravenswood House, Knowle, Fareham, Hampshire PO17 5NA, UK.
The British Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 7.99). 02/2006; 188:4-6. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.010488
Source: PubMed


Guidelines for good medical practice do not reflect the complex reality of the ethical problems that arise in prison. Perhaps the best a doctor working in prison can do is realise that there are ethical dilemmas everywhere, try to recognise them and feel the tension.


Available from: Simon Wilson, Jan 11, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The principle of "equivalence of care" in prison medicine is a principle by which prison health services are obliged to provide prisoners with care of a quality equivalent to that provided for the general public in the same country. It is cited in numerous national and international directives and recommendations. The principle of equivalence is extremely relevant from the point of view of normative ethics but requires adaptation from the point of view of applied ethics. From a clinical point of view, the principle of equivalence is often insufficient to take account of the adaptations necessary for the organization of care in a correctional setting. The principle of equivalence is cost-effective in general, but has to be overstepped to ensure the humane management of certain special cases.
    Journal of Medical Ethics 11/2007; 33(10):610-3. DOI:10.1136/jme.2006.018077 · 1.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prisoners are at greater risk of developing mental health problems compared with people of a similar age and gender in the community. They are less likely to have their mental health needs recognised, are less likely to receive psychiatric help or treatment, and are at an increased risk of suicide. Prison mental health in-reach services have been developed in the UK to address these problems. An organisational case study method was used to generate theory about the links between the aims, processes and impacts of the introduction of mental health in-reach teams to prison contexts. Case studies were undertaken on six sites and included interviews and focus groups with in-reach team staff, prison healthcare staff, and discipline staff. The aims of prison mental health in-reach were related to providing an equivalent service to a Community Mental Health Team, with a primary focus on serious mental illness, but a widening role. Achievement of these aims was mediated by the organisational context, active relationship development and leadership. Overall effects were positively reported by all stakeholders. Successful development was not just a function of time in post, but also a function of the effectiveness of leadership within the in-reach teams. The more effective teams were having a wide impact on the response to mental health problems in the prison setting.
    International Journal of Prisoner Health 12/2007; 3(4):234-247. DOI:10.1080/17449200701682428
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: High and variable rates of attendance at GP consultations in prisons are observed. The aim of the study is to have a clearer understanding of social factors influencing inmates' help-seeking behaviour and demand for primary health care. A qualitative study was carried out in five Belgian prisons (three Dutch-speaking and two French-speaking). Twenty-five male inmates were interviewed face-to-face and 18 caregivers (7 nurses and 11 GPs) in focus groups. Five main social factors explain inmates' help-seeking behaviour and demand for primary health care: (1) inmates' negative perception of imprisonment increases help-seeking behaviour; (2) inmates use their rights to health care as strategies to maintain some form of control over their lives; (3) the doctor's role distorts expression of need and demand; (4) health professionals' control over inmates' lives creates mistrust and a controlling therapeutic relationship; and (5) lack of alternatives to health care. These factors are mutually dependent and cause a confrontation in the inmates' and clinicians' agendas. The most important recommendation is to understand what the inmates are really seeking in their demands. This information can be used to develop appropriate alternatives in terms of human support and well-being facilities. The therapeutic and security roles of health care workers should be separated, in order to increase the trust that is central to the therapeutic relationship between them and inmates.
    International Journal of Prisoner Health 10/2008; 4(3):146-55. DOI:10.1080/17449200802264696
Show more