Article

Vesicular Monogamy?

Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Hatos Center for Neuropharmacology, The David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.
Neuron (Impact Factor: 15.98). 02/2006; 49(1):1-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Some 50 years ago, Bernard Katz and colleagues demonstrated that neurotransmitter is released as packets, or quanta, and a wealth of subsequent data have shown that synaptic vesicles (SVs) are the physical correlate of these quanta (Atwood and Karunanithi, 2002). Vesicular neurotransmitter transporters are responsible for packaging neurotransmitter into the lumen of the vesicle and thereby generating the concentration and absolute quantity of transmitter that makes up each quanta (see Hediger et al., 2004 and accompanying articles). But how much neurotransmitter is contained in the lumen of each vesicle? Is that number absolutely fixed, or might it vary depending on the activity of the transporter and the number of transporters that localize to each vesicle? And finally, how many transporters are required to localize to an individual SV in order to fill the lumen of the vesicle? The molecular-genetic analysis of vesicular transporters has begun to yield answers to some of these questions (Colliver et al., 2000, Fremeau et al., 2004, Pothos et al., 2000, Wilson et al., 2005 and Wojcik et al., 2004), and in this issue of Neuron, a paper from the DiAntonio lab suggests that the number of transporters required to fill a vesicle may be as few as one (Daniels et al., 2006).

0 Followers
 · 
64 Views
 · 
0 Downloads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Neuroimaging studies typically identify neural activity correlated with the predictions of highly parameterized models, like the many reward prediction error (RPE) models used to study reinforcement learning. Identified brain areas might encode RPEs or, alternatively, only have activity correlated with RPE model predictions. Here, we use an alternate axiomatic approach rooted in economic theory to formally test the entire class of RPE models on neural data. We show that measurements of human neural activity from the striatum, medial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and posterior cingulate cortex satisfy necessary and sufficient conditions for the entire class of RPE models. However, activity measured from the anterior insula falsifies the axiomatic model, and therefore no RPE model can account for measured activity. Further analysis suggests the anterior insula might instead encode something related to the salience of an outcome. As cognitive neuroscience matures and models proliferate, formal approaches of this kind that assess entire model classes rather than specific model exemplars may take on increased significance.
    The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 10/2010; 30(40):13525-36. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1747-10.2010 · 6.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recordings of brain electrophysiological activity provide the most direct reflect of neural function. Information contained in these signals varies as a function of the spatial scale at which recordings are done: from single cell recording to large scale macroscopic fields, e.g., scalp EEG. Microscopic and macroscopic measurements and models in Neuroscience are often in conflict. Solving this conflict might require the developments of a sort of bio-statistical physics, a framework for relating the microscopic properties of individual cells to the macroscopic or bulk properties of neural circuits. Such a framework can only emerge in Neuroscience from the systematic analysis and modeling of the diverse recording scales from simultaneous measurements. In this article we briefly review the different measurement scales and models in modern neuroscience to try to identify the sources of conflict that might ultimately help to create a unified theory of brain electromagnetic fields. We argue that seen the different recording scales, from the single cell to the large scale fields measured by the scalp electroencephalogram, as derived from a unique physical magnitude--the electric potential that is measured in all cases--might help to conciliate microscopic and macroscopic models of neural function as well as the animal and human neuroscience literature.
    Medical & Biological Engineering 05/2011; 49(5):511-20. DOI:10.1007/s11517-011-0769-4 · 1.50 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from