Toward a Comprehensive Developmental Model for Major Depression in Men

Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Ричмонд, Virginia, United States
American Journal of Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 12.3). 02/2006; 163(1):115-24. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.115
Source: PubMed


The multiple risk factors for major depression are interrelated through poorly understood developmental pathways. In 2002, the authors presented a developmental model for major depression in women. Based on similar methods, they here present an analogous model for men.
Using data from 2,935 adult male twins, interviewed twice over a 2-4-year period, the authors constructed, by means of structural equation modeling, an integrated etiologic model for major depression that predicts depressive episodes over 1 year from 18 risk factors conceptualized as five developmental "tiers" reflecting childhood, early adolescence, late adolescence, adulthood, and the last year.
The best-fitting model, including six correlations and 76 paths, provided a good fit to the data, explaining 49% of the variance in the liability to depressive episodes. The overall results, similar to those seen in women, suggest that the development of major depression results from the action and interaction of three broad pathways of internalizing symptoms, externalizing symptoms, and adversity. Childhood parental loss and low self-esteem were more potent variables in the model in men than in women. Genetic risks for major depression had a broader spectrum of action in men than in women. The pathway to major depression through externalizing symptoms was not more prominent in men than in women.
Major depression in men, as in women, is an etiologically complex disorder influenced by risk factors from multiple domains that act in developmental time. The similarities in etiologic pathways to major depression for men and women outweigh the modest differences.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "According to the multifactorial model of depression (Kendler et al. 2002), there are multiple genes and environments that may additively or interactively influence depression. A large number of studies have examined G 9 E interactions using a candidate-gene approach when investigating adult depression (Lopizzo et al. 2015), but less research on gene–environment interaction has targeted youth. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although depressive symptoms are common during adolescence, little research has examined gene-environment interaction on youth depression. This study chose the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene, tested the interaction between a functional polymorphism resulting amino acid substitution of valine (Val) to methionine (Met) in the proBDNF protein at codon 66 (Val66Met), and maternal parenting on youth depressive symptoms in a sample of 780 community adolescents of Chinese Han ethnicity (aged 11-17, M = 13.6, 51.3 % females). Participants reported their depressive symptoms and perceived maternal parenting. Results indicated the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism significantly moderated the influence of maternal warmth-reasoning, but not harshness-hostility, on youth depressive symptoms. Confirmatory model evaluation indicated that the interaction effect involving warmth-reasoning conformed to the differential-susceptibility rather than diathesis-stress model of person-X-environment interaction. Thus, Val carriers experienced less depressive symptoms than Met homozygotes when mothering was more positive but more symptoms when mothering was less positive. The findings provided evidence in support of the differential susceptibility hypothesis of youth depressive symptoms and shed light on the importance of examining the gene-environment interaction from a developmental perspective.
    Journal of Youth and Adolescence 10/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10964-015-0378-x · 2.72 Impact Factor
    • "The EPQR-S is an internationally established personality test, which is used extensively in research to predict the occurrence and characteristics of psychological distress and emotional instability (e.g., Gershuny & Sher, 1998; Kendler, Gardner, & Prescott, 2002). It includes 48 items and 4 subscales: extraversion (12 items), neuroticism (12 items), psychoticism (12 items), and lie (12 items). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Catastrophic misinterpretations of bodily symptoms have a central role in cognitive-behavioural models of health anxiety. However, the metacognitive (S-REF) model postulates that psychological disturbance is linked more to beliefs about thinking i.e., metacognition. Equally the relationship between catastrophic misinterpretation and health anxiety should be moderated by metacognition, in particular negative beliefs about the uncontrollability and danger of thinking (MCQNeg). Participants (N=351) completed measures to examine the relationship between these variables. Results indicated positive relationships between metacognition, catastrophic misinterpretation, and health anxiety. Moderation analysis showed that the effect of catastrophic misinterpretations on health anxiety was explained by the proposed interaction with metacognition. Follow-up regression analysis demonstrated the interaction term explained variance in health anxiety when controlling for other variables, and was a stronger unique predictor of health anxiety than catastrophic misinterpretation. Metacognition appears to be an important factor in the relationship between catastrophic misinterpretation and health anxiety, and would have important implications for existing models and treatment. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Journal of anxiety disorders 06/2015; 34. DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.05.005 · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "This design was used to increase variability on the constructs of interest; however, the results may be limited in their generalizability. This study examined the differential effect of independent and dependent events on stress response based on the importance of this distinction in prior research (e.g., Kendler et al., 2006). Other categories of stressors merit consideration, including but not limited to, interpersonal and achievement stressors, which have been shown to be associated with depressive outcomes (e.g., Eberhart & Hammen, 2010; Carter & Garber, 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stressful life events are associated with an increase in depressive symptoms and the onset of major depression. Importantly, research has shown that the role of stress changes over the course of depression. The present study extends the current literature by examining the effects of early life stress on emotional reactivity to current stressors. In a multiwave study (N = 281, mean age = 18.76; 68% female), we investigated the proximal changes that occur in depressive symptoms when individuals are faced with life stress and whether a history of childhood emotional abuse moderates this relationship. Results support the stress sensitivity hypothesis for early emotional abuse history. Individuals with greater childhood emotional abuse severity experienced greater increases in depressive symptoms when confronted with current dependent stressors, controlling for childhood physical and sexual abuse. This study highlights the importance of emotional abuse as an indicator for reactivity to stressful life events.
    Journal of Clinical Psychology 03/2014; 70(3):209-223. DOI:10.1002/jclp.22011 · 2.12 Impact Factor
Show more